Is it immoral to sue your dominatrix

[stucknut]

I saw this item and couldn't help but think of George Costanza loosing his pants. Not the same I know, just how I think.

http://http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/10/german-undertaker-sues-do_n_1954700.html?utm_hp_ref=weird-news

 

[Netzach]

"The court decided that it was impossible to know for sure what really happened because both parties had consumed too much cocaine during their encounter."

....annnd this is why we play straight, ladies.

 

[Sir_Winston54]

For anyone who has a problem hitting the link posted by stucknut, try Stella's link in the next post. I apparently fucked up my copy-paste.

 

[Stella_Omega]

try this one

 

[Sir_Winston54]

For anyone who has a problem hitting the link posted by stucknut, try this one.

try this one

WTH? I dunno what happened there. I had the right page, and the right link. I must have not hit Ctrl-C hard enough or something. Thank you, Stella.

 

[Etoile]

"Cologne district court spokesman Dirk Esser said the plaintiff had accused the woman he hired for sex last month of holding a kitchen knife to his throat before demanding his debit card and PIN number."

Fuck that noise. That's robbery, not domination.

 

[Etoile]

Oh hrm, I didn't even think of findom. Thanks, Mr. of Oberon!

 

[Stella_Omega]

would you call, Cú Chulainn the Hound of Culann; "Mr of Culann"?

well i suppose around here you just might, & I suppose that might be considered better than just "hound"

You woundn't call a courier to the king "Mr to the King"

I think that's what I'm getting at, but the more I over think it, the less I think it matters.

English kings and queens have been known to address each other as "Mr. King" and "Mrs. Queen"

because the English are just adorable like that.

 

[Netzach]

We don't know if it's findom or robbery, that's part of the problem. I thought coked up play was an 80's thing, but it's insanely popular, often "wow I'm so coked up take advantage of my chattering mile a minute mania" is even a popular mini-scene within the scene.

 

[BiBunny]

If I were stuck in a room with a cokehead, I'd probably pull a knife on him, too.

Just sayin'.

 

[Stella_Omega]

If I were stuck in a room with a cokehead, I'd probably pull a knife on him, too.

Just sayin'.

If I were in a room with a cokehead, I would be expecting her to pull a knife on me.

 

[Etoile]

would you call, Cú Chulainn the Hound of Culann; "Mr of Culann"?

well i suppose around here you just might, & I suppose that might be considered better than just "hound"

You woundn't call a courier to the king "Mr to the King"

I think that's what I'm getting at, but the more I over think it, the less I think it matters.

I was just joking around...sigh...

 

[BiBunny]

If I were in a room with a cokehead, I would be expecting her to pull a knife on me.

Exactly. That's why you have to beat her on the draw.

 

[bhndblueyes88]

OH I KNOW!

simple provocative answer time!

YES it IS immoral to sue your mistress.

If you feel abused; man up and do it anyway.

What if your mistress violated the terms of your agreement? Obviously in this case there was drugs involved so god knows what sort of agreement was arranged. But, particularly in this case where you're HIRING someone to be your short-term mistress, I'd say violating the terms of the "contract" would be grounds to sue if damages were made. I count stealing someone's debit card information as "damages".

After all. Maybe this fellow didn't agree to financial domination. Even if he had, I fail to see how that requires a knife? I imagine that busting out weaponry is something you should probably keep to dedicated partners you trust. In any case, this was, essentially, a business transaction of a service. If a service agreement is violated, I believe that opens one to being sued. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, though. I have no where near a complete understanding of law.

 

[youknowyoulike]

So to top it off (no pun intended) I have to score coke first?

 

[Netzach]

What if your mistress violated the terms of your agreement? Obviously in this case there was drugs involved so god knows what sort of agreement was arranged. But, particularly in this case where you're HIRING someone to be your short-term mistress, I'd say violating the terms of the "contract" would be grounds to sue if damages were made. I count stealing someone's debit card information as "damages".

After all. Maybe this fellow didn't agree to financial domination. Even if he had, I fail to see how that requires a knife? I imagine that busting out weaponry is something you should probably keep to dedicated partners you trust. In any case, this was, essentially, a business transaction of a service. If a service agreement is violated, I believe that opens one to being sued. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, though. I have no where near a complete understanding of law.

The knife, the money, the demands could ALL be "scene request" and this guy a douche.

Or the complete opposite.

 

[bhndblueyes88]

The knife, the money, the demands could ALL be "scene request" and this guy a douche.

Or the complete opposite.

Oh that's totally possible. As I said, considering drug abuse was involved who KNOWS what the terms of the agreement were. I'm just speaking generally using details from this case as an example.