p_p_man
The 'Euro' European
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2001
- Posts
- 24,253
First of all I haven't seen any proof that bin Laden is directly responsible. I've seen plenty of information about the links made between the hijackers and bin Laden, but as the money man for terrorism, I would expect there to be links.
Then again I have seen plenty of information about the links made between the terrorists and the CIA, like the CIA manuals being found in some of the apartments raided by the FBI and the police in Germany. But I would hardly think that they were anything more than tentative links.
If there is proof then I can see no harm in releasing it to the public. It could hardly be called a national secret.
Secondly the whole tone of Bush's speeches although hitting the right buttons in the immediate aftermath of the terror don't give any credence as to what will happen after bin Laden has been "smoked out", if indeed he actually is.
Will Bush then look at the way America gives sanctuary and help to the IRA terrorists? Or does that somehow not come into his idea of a global war against terrorism.
Tony Blair has already said that we are at war against the terrorist but that is an easy statement for him to make because the UK has been at war against them since the 1960s. It just hasn't been a global war.
If I were in Bush's place I honestly don't know what I would do next but I would hope that I would give a lot of deep thought to what I actually say.

Then again I have seen plenty of information about the links made between the terrorists and the CIA, like the CIA manuals being found in some of the apartments raided by the FBI and the police in Germany. But I would hardly think that they were anything more than tentative links.
If there is proof then I can see no harm in releasing it to the public. It could hardly be called a national secret.
Secondly the whole tone of Bush's speeches although hitting the right buttons in the immediate aftermath of the terror don't give any credence as to what will happen after bin Laden has been "smoked out", if indeed he actually is.
Will Bush then look at the way America gives sanctuary and help to the IRA terrorists? Or does that somehow not come into his idea of a global war against terrorism.
Tony Blair has already said that we are at war against the terrorist but that is an easy statement for him to make because the UK has been at war against them since the 1960s. It just hasn't been a global war.
If I were in Bush's place I honestly don't know what I would do next but I would hope that I would give a lot of deep thought to what I actually say.