Is a 18-year old girl too young to perform in pornographic images?

18 is legal. even if she does have the body of a 25 year old, and the face of a 15 year old.
 
Sometimes it is difficult to define what is art.

That painting is not pornography.

Why not? She's naked. The model who posed for this painting was 16 at the time.

Is there something pornographic about photograph of a naked young woman but not a painting?
 
I gotta be honest
she has a creepily young face

BUT
if shes 18
then its her choice
 
Sure shes not. I dont see a difference in 17 and 18. It's just a law to make people feel comfortable about life an whos having sex with who. A 18 year old is no more mature and or ready for sex then the 17 they just had to draw a line somewhere so people would stfu. If they wanted to make a legitimate age limit it would be more like 25 if not older. LoL People always reach that age where they thought they knew the deal throught life, and then learn they really didn't.
 
It does not disturb me much, because it's just a nude photo.

Porn images are a different matter.

You started a thread about young girls in pornographic images. Your link just exposed her to probably a thousand or more eyes, but now it's not porn.



If she bent over and pulled her ass cheeks apart, would that be porn?
 
You started a thread about young girls in pornographic images. Your link just exposed her to probably a thousand or more eyes, but now it's not porn.



If she bent over and pulled her ass cheeks apart, would that be porn?
I'll know it when I see it.

When do you think that might be?
 
Back
Top