IRON HYMEN: Abstinence Facts & Pledge for Girls

shereads

Sloganless
Joined
Jun 6, 2003
Posts
19,242
http://www.ironhymen.com

"Take it from me, girls. There's no good reason to rush into S-E-X. That's why I hope these scientific facts help you choose abstinence, so you never know the heartbreak of being trapped in a loveless marriage just because you drank too many margaritas one night and gave up your honey pot to a pushy young cokehead from a so-called 'good family.'"

~ The First Lady's introduction to "Ten Things Every Girl Should Know About Boys & Their Privates"

"Thanks to Iron Hymen, my baby cave is better protected than a maximum security prison."

~ an Iron Hymen Program Testimonial
 
tell me why i had visions of the CB2000 flash before my eyes.
maybe its the cough medicine
 
Pure said:
it a joke, of course, but kinda funny.

Are you sure? Laura seems okay, but don't foget that the man she married can't get through an hour of unscripted speech without blurting out something that, when quoted, will elicit accusations that someone is "making fun of the president."

We expect the states to show us whether or not we are achieving simple objectives, like literacy, literacy in math, the ability to read and write."

~ April 28 2005
 
Last edited:
Clarifying his Social Security proposal:

This one didn't fit in the poll fields so it didn't make the Bushisms challenge thread. It stands on its own merit:

"Because the — all which is on the table begins to address the big cost drivers. For example, how benefits are calculate, for example, is on the table; whether or not benefits rise based upon wage increases or price increases. There's a series of parts of the formula that are being considered. And when you couple that, those different cost drivers, affecting those — changing those with personal accounts, the idea is to get what has been promised more likely to be — or closer delivered to what has been promised. Does that make any sense to you? It's kind of muddled."
 
impressive said:
She does? To me, she seems like a plastic sycophant version of a fuck doll.

She has to co-exist with her mother-in-law. I give her credit for not having gone postal yet.
 
shereads said:
This one didn't fit in the poll fields so it didn't make the Bushisms challenge thread. It stands on its own merit:

"Because the — all which is on the table begins to address the big cost drivers. For example, how benefits are calculate, for example, is on the table; whether or not benefits rise based upon wage increases or price increases. There's a series of parts of the formula that are being considered. And when you couple that, those different cost drivers, affecting those — changing those with personal accounts, the idea is to get what has been promised more likely to be — or closer delivered to what has been promised. Does that make any sense to you? It's kind of muddled."



Ehm... huh? :confused:
 
Back
Top