In France you can punish your wife for not having sex with you.

[LJ_Reloaded]

Well, actually, no, the wife can punish her husband for not having sex with her. LOL gotcha.

Now you're gonna be enraged at me for posting this rather than at this woman judge for basically enabling rape culture. Never fails! I always post the facts, I'm always right, and you always attack the messenger because you're too scared to have a go at the message.

As long as you keep pulling this chickenshit tactic I'll never stop posting this stuff. It makes great fodder for google searches.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...s-B-pays-9-000-damages-lack-sex-marriage.html

Not tonight, Monique! Frenchman ordered to pay ex-wife £9,000 for not having sex after marriage
By TIM FINAN
UPDATED: 04:11 EST, 7 September 2011

A reluctant husband has been sued for £9,000 by his wife for failing to have sex with her for 'a period of several years'.

The 51-year-old Frenchman, named only as Jean-Louis, neglected his matrimonial duties to wife Monique in Nice, who sued him for 10,000 euros (£8,700) and took her divorce case to an Appeal Court.

The court in Aix-en-Provence heard that the couple had been married for 21 years and raised two children on the French Riviera.

But the strains of work and illness prevented Jean-Louis from fulfilling his matrimonial duties, his advocate pleaded.

Announcing her decision the judge quoted the French civil and penal code, which requires both parties in a marriage to respect ‘lifelong community’ requiring them by law to have sexual relations.

Whereas sexual abstinence in a couple, together with violence and infidelity, are cited regularly in hundreds of divorce claims in France, it is extremely rare for a husband or wife to pay financial damages for specifically failing to satisfy sexually.

 

[StrangeLife]

Fair enough. Even if you can't rise to the occasion, you do have a tongue.

The guy had no valid excuse...

 

[cjh]

I am sorry you were emasculated.

I hope it was only psychological.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Fair enough. Even if you can't rise to the occasion, you do have a tongue.

The guy had no valid excuse...

Consent is irrelevant, folks. You read it right here.

 

[StrangeLife]

Consent is irrelevant, folks. You read it right here.

It's not about consent LJ.

A marriage is a contractual obligation with certain direct and implied stipulations. As in all areas you should not sign a contract that you cannot or do not intend to fulfil. If you do, you'll get sued for breach of contract. Simple as that.

The dude entered a relationship with a woman - he screwed her over (or rather, he failed to do so ) and she sued him. How is that not fair?

 

[subdued_passion]

It's not about consent LJ.

A marriage is a contractual obligation with certain direct and implied stipulations. As in all areas you should not sign a contract that you cannot or do not intend to fulfil. If you do, you'll get sued for breach of contract. Simple as that.

The dude entered a relationship with a woman - he screwed her over (or rather, he failed to do so ) and she sued him. How is that not fair?

Because marriage is holy and sacred and has nothing to do with sex. Sex is for making babies. Once the babies come, there is no need for sex. Woman wanting sex, is a harlot. Woman wanting sex from husband, is just nuts. *nods*

 

[badbabysitter]

Well, actually, no, the wife can punish her husband for not having sex with her. LOL gotcha.

Now you're gonna be enraged at me for posting this rather than at this woman judge for basically enabling rape culture. Never fails! I always post the facts, I'm always right, and you always attack the messenger because you're too scared to have a go at the message.

As long as you keep pulling this chickenshit tactic I'll never stop posting this stuff. It makes great fodder for google searches.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...s-B-pays-9-000-damages-lack-sex-marriage.html

Not tonight, Monique! Frenchman ordered to pay ex-wife £9,000 for not having sex after marriage
By TIM FINAN
UPDATED: 04:11 EST, 7 September 2011

A reluctant husband has been sued for £9,000 by his wife for failing to have sex with her for 'a period of several years'.

The 51-year-old Frenchman, named only as Jean-Louis, neglected his matrimonial duties to wife Monique in Nice, who sued him for 10,000 euros (£8,700) and took her divorce case to an Appeal Court.

The court in Aix-en-Provence heard that the couple had been married for 21 years and raised two children on the French Riviera.

But the strains of work and illness prevented Jean-Louis from fulfilling his matrimonial duties, his advocate pleaded.

Announcing her decision the judge quoted the French civil and penal code, which requires both parties in a marriage to respect ‘lifelong community’ requiring them by law to have sexual relations.

Whereas sexual abstinence in a couple, together with violence and infidelity, are cited regularly in hundreds of divorce claims in France, it is extremely rare for a husband or wife to pay financial damages for specifically failing to satisfy sexually.

if she did the same, he'd be completely in his rights to sue

I fail to see the outrage

if there was an expectation of sex upon entering the relationship, if there consensual attempts at this, if there was no attempt to coerce or force the partner, and if there had been a history of sex with the spouse ( as evidenced by two children)..then a civil action could be laid...

it's a civil suit.. not a criminal one

failing to see the outrage here

 

[subdued_passion]

if she did the same, he'd be completely in his rights to sue

I fail to see the outrage

if there was an expectation of sex upon entering the relationship, if there consensual attempts at this, if there was no attempt to coerce or force the partner, and if there had been a history of sex with the spouse ( as evidenced by two children)..then a civil action could be laid...

it's a civil suit.. not a criminal one

failing to see the outrage here

It happened to a man.

http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/When-people-who-ordered-after-you-get-their-food-first.gif

 

[about_average]

Well, actually, no

Actually, yes.

Did you even read what you C&P'd?

Announcing her decision the judge quoted the French civil and penal code, which requires both parties in a marriage to respect ‘lifelong community’ requiring them by law to have sexual relations.

The rightness of the law may be debatable, but it applies to both man and women.
So your post is a 100% fail.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

if she did the same, he'd be completely in his rights to sue

You're joking, right? He'd be laughed out of the court room.

Feminists would be burning shit down while rioting over RAEP CULTURE in the streets.

I fail to see the outrage

Yeah, making your spouse have sex with you under threat of a civil lawsuit, no that's not coercion, nosiree.

You've got to be fucking kidding me. You've gone past losing your marbles, you're like in negative marbles territory here.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Actually, yes.

Did you even read what you C&P'd?



The rightness of the law may be debatable, but it applies to both man and women.
So your post is a 100% fail.

On paper it applies to both men and women - but in reality it doesn't. It never does.

Idiot.

 

[badbabysitter]

You're joking, right? He'd be laughed out of the court room.

Feminists would be burning shit down while rioting over RAEP CULTURE in the streets.


Yeah, making your spouse have sex with you under threat of a civil lawsuit, no that's not coercion, nosiree.

You've got to be fucking kidding me. You've gone past losing your marbles, you're like in negative marbles territory here.

a guy recently successfully sue his wife for over a hundred grand for having an ugly baby

no riots, no shitstorms

why..because it was a legit civil suit

your skewed vision of the world simply does not match reality

 

[dan_c00000]

I am sorry you were emasculated.

I hope it was only psychological.

I wonder what LJ's mother was like? I'm sure there's some Freudian reason why he's like this.

I thought this piece on LJ's harassment of women was pretty interesting. This was the money quote that I knew LJ was the trouble maker:

And the group of visitors to a “men’s rights” site who pored over photographs of me and a prominent feminist activist, then discussed how they’d “spend the night with” us. (“Put em both in a gimp mask and tied to each other 69 so the bitches can’t talk or move and go round the world, any old port in a storm, any old hole,” one decided.)

 

[Queersetti]

You have been posting variations on the same theme for more than a decade.

If you had spent even a tiny fraction of the time you put into posting into therapy, you could have been living a well adjusted life for years now.

 

[unregistered]

 

[pointless]

be fair. he used to post about politics as well. yes, in a crazy, manically schizoid fashion where everyone else was wrong even when they agreed with him, but this is still the result of a... evolution in style for him, if you will. it should be acknowledge. this man had to struggle and strive before he deadended into being a repetitive, botlike cunt with no imagination or originality and i for one respect him for that.

 

[about_average]

On paper it applies to both men and women - but in reality it doesn't. It never does.

Prove it.

Idiot.

 

[dan_c00000]

be fair. he used to post about politics as well. yes, in a crazy, manically schizoid fashion where everyone else was wrong even when they agreed with him, but this is still the result of a... evolution in style for him, if you will. it should be acknowledge. this man had to struggle and strive before he deadended into being a repetitive, botlike cunt with no imagination or originality and i for one respect him for that.

Nice, +1.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Prove it.

Idiot.

Really, you drooling retard? Show me one time where some dude sued his wife in France for not giving him sex, and won.

Alternately you could just go eat a shotgun and end your misery.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

a guy recently successfully sue his wife for over a hundred grand for having an ugly baby

no riots, no shitstorms

why..because it was a legit civil suit

your skewed vision of the world simply does not match reality

ROTFLMAO you rape defending dumbass, you failed again.

http://www.snopes.com/media/notnews/uglybaby.asp

Claim: A man in China has sued his wife for bearing him ugly children.

PROBABLY FALSE

 

[badbabysitter]

ROTFLMAO you rape defending dumbass, you failed again.

http://www.snopes.com/media/notnews/uglybaby.asp

Claim: A man in China has sued his wife for bearing him ugly children.

PROBABLY FALSE

but according to you.. there would be riots and shitstorms

why didnt that happen?

people have flipped out over much less things which turned out to be complete lies

just like when you talked about that rally where feminists attacked police, " many with axe handles"


seriously , dude, get a grip

 

[about_average]

Really, you drooling retard? Show me one time where some dude sued his wife in France for not giving him sex, and won.

Not my place to. You're the one who claims it doesn't apply to men, so that must mean you have the proof that men have sued their wives and always lost.
You made the claim, you provide the proof.

Alternately you could just go eat a shotgun and end your misery.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Not my place to. You're the one who claims it doesn't apply to men, so that must mean you have the proof that men have sued their wives and always lost.
You made the claim, you provide the proof.

I don't fucking need to. So suck it.

I say there is no such thing as a man suing an ex-wife for not giving him sex. That stands as truth until someone can show there is a case.

Now that load of buckshot is for you little fucktard.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

but according to you.. there would be riots and shitstorms

why didnt that happen?

Because the story you spoke of, didn't actually happen? And the ALLEGED event happened in China. Fucking CHINA, which is totally not like France or anywhere in Western Europe. CHINA, where they fucking kill baby girls.

You might as well be referring to an event on Mars. Which, of course, DID NOT EVEN HAPPEN.

You epic failure of a human being.

 

[badbabysitter]

Because the story you spoke of, didn't actually happen? And the ALLEGED event happened in China. Fucking CHINA, which is totally not like France or anywhere in Western Europe. CHINA, where they fucking kill baby girls.

You might as well be referring to an event on Mars. Which, of course, DID NOT EVEN HAPPEN.

You epic failure of a human being.

Oh cry me a fucking river you big victim

much worse shit has happened to women and there hasnt been rioting in the streets

if men were truly outraged by this, they should be getting organized and doing something about it.. but they're not

so it's either one of two things..

either there is zero reason to believe it would be any different if the genders were reversed..and untill you can prove ( you know actual facts instead of opinion) your opinion is true; its bullshit

or your mighty MRA are great about bitching but too cowardly to take action


you are on record lying about women attacking the police with axe handles..something which is incredibly insane to start with.. and you said it happned in North America where it would have been on every fucking news outlet there is..and yet, magically is not mentioned anywhere in the media

either you prove it would happen if the gender roles were reversed

or you organize a protest against it

put up

or shut up