Impeachment of Trump was “Unconstitutional” and fraudulent!

BidudeinWi

Literotica Guru
Joined
Dec 24, 2008
Posts
3,600
“ Alan Dershowitz, the famed Harvard law professor who was a member of Trump's impeachment defense team, said the withholding of Kent's email and other evidence Just the News reported earlier this week was a "very serious constitutional violation" of what is known as the Brady rule requiring all potentially exculpatory evidence be turned over to defendants.

"The United States Supreme Court in the Brady decision ruled that when a defendant is on trial, the prosecutors cannot withhold evidence that could be exculpatory, or in any way helpful to the defendant," Dershowitz said.

"And obviously, that has to apply to impeachment proceedings even more so," he added. "Because in impeachment proceedings, the American public has the right to know all the evidence. And if the people who impeached President Trump — obviously I was one of the lawyers on the other side — were aware of exculpatory evidence or evidence that would in some way mitigate the charges, they had an obligation to turn it over to us so that we could use this information in defending our client."

https://justthenews.com/accountabil...-state-department-email-declared-hunter-biden
 
^Don't debate the troll. Just do what Brains n Boobs and I do- derail his threads with more interesting and fun shit, so he'll get discouraged and eventually go away.
 
No it wasn't.

Hey douche, Dershowitz just cited the Brady Law. The Prosecution cannot withhold exculpatory evidence and it applies during the fake “impeachment” trial. One of the “star witnesses “ for the LibFucks, WROTE THAT EMAIL, at the end of Barry’s term and thus knew about it. THAT’S Unconstitutional, dumbfuck!
 
^Don't debate the troll. Just do what Brains n Boobs and I do- derail his threads with more interesting and fun shit, so he'll get discouraged and eventually go away.

^fuck off
 
You never have anything intelligent to add say to begin with though, so....
 
Either way, at least we succeeded in derailing your idiotic thread, which is all that matters.
 
Either way, at least we succeeded in derailing your idiotic thread, which is all that matters.

JaFo and you are two peas in a pod.

Certainly I did not join with you.in any effort.
 
So back to Dershowitz’s point about exculpatory evidence. The entire fake “ trial” needs to called a mistrial and expunged.

That's not actually a thing that can happen

But good on your for trying
 
JaFo and you are two peas in a pod.

Certainly I did not join with you.in any effort.

“Two peas in a pod” = Limpwristed, soy boy douchebags that should have been bitch-slapped by their parents, MANY TIMES, for being the pussy’s they are!
 
“Two peas in a pod” = Limpwristed, soy boy douchebags that should have been bitch-slapped by their parents, MANY TIMES, for being the pussy’s they are!

You just can't stay away from making a comment.

You're a different breed by yourself.....but thanks for making an irrelevant comment.
 
So you admit that withholding exculpatory evidence is Unconstitutional, and illegal, right?

Nobody is withholding anything.

If you were on trial, you'd be able to seek additional evidence as warranted.
 
Back
Top