Illegal Aliens Not Entitled To Bond Hearings

Rightguide

Prof Triggernometry
Joined
Feb 7, 2017
Posts
61,957
AMERICAN NEWS Jun 13, 2022 10:28 AM EST

BREAKING: Supreme Court rules noncitizens not entitled to bond hearings​

On Monday, the United States Supreme Court ruled that unlawful migrants to the United States are not entitled to a bond hearing.

Ashley St. ClairNew York, NY

June 13, 2022 10:28 AM

On Monday, the United States Supreme Court ruled that unlawful migrants to the United States are not entitled to a bond hearing. The opinion stems from the migration of Antonio Arteaga-Martinez.

Arteaga-Martinez, a Mexican Citizen, came to the United States unlawfully on four occasions without inspection until May 2018, when Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) issued a warrant for Arteaga-Martinez’s arrest after he had been living and working in the United States for almost six years. ICE’s detention of Arteaga-Martinez did not come with the opportunity for a bond hearing and he was set to be removed from the United States.

The opinion written by Sotomayor reverses the judgment of the lower courts and finds that the process provided by ICE provides sufficient procedural protections for non-citizens, and that Arteaga-Martinez was not entitled to a bond hearing before an immigration judge. The Supreme Court declined to address Arteaga-Martinez’s constitutional claims.

More here:

https://thepostmillennial.com/break...-entitled-to-bond-hearings?utm_campaign=64487

The hopes and dreams of the left are dashed by Sotomayor.
 
"The Left" wasn't in charge when she was entering the US illegally, vettedummy. If only there was a wall.
 
The opinion written by Sotomayor reverses the judgment of the lower courts and finds that the process provided by ICE provides sufficient procedural protections for non-citizens, and that Arteaga-Martinez was not entitled to a bond hearing before an immigration judge. The Supreme Court declined to address Arteaga-Martinez’s constitutional claims.

As far as I'm concerned if your an illegal you have no constitutional rights, if you entered legally then you have a leg to stand on!
 
The opinion written by Sotomayor reverses the judgment of the lower courts and finds that the process provided by ICE provides sufficient procedural protections for non-citizens, and that Arteaga-Martinez was not entitled to a bond hearing before an immigration judge. The Supreme Court declined to address Arteaga-Martinez’s constitutional claims.

As far as I'm concerned if your an illegal you have no constitutional rights, if you entered legally then you have a leg to stand on!
Amen.
 
Good.

Everyone should be afforded bail prior to their hearing
 
Good.

Everyone should be afforded bail prior to their hearing
if they entered legally I'm all for it, you jump the fence line or circumvent the process your a criminal already you get your go to jail card right away and don't get to start over!

for example you go buy a gun for a "friend" that is on parole and prohibited from owning one Bing batá boom your both criminals your "friend" 2 X over get caught and on trial and if i'm on the jury it would be hard for me to let you walk.
 
if they entered legally I'm all for it, you jump the fence line or circumvent the process your a criminal already you get your go to jail card right away and don't get to start over!

for example you go buy a gun for a "friend" that is on parole and prohibited from owning one Bing batá boom your both criminals your "friend" 2 X over get caught and on trial and if i'm on the jury it would be hard for me to let you walk.
You don't understand bond/bail. It doesn't stop them from being prosecuted or from a trial.
 
You don't understand bond/bail. It doesn't stop them from being prosecuted or from a trial.
Yes I understand the bail process completely (I've bailed a few friends out) their already a criminal by being here illegality why should they have bond / bail just to skip on it they abused the system so send them home, were not playing base ball and its 3 strikes your out.
 
Yes I understand the bail process completely (I've bailed a few friends out) their already a criminal by being here illegality why should they have bond / bail just to skip on it they abused the system so send them home, were not playing base ball and its 3 strikes your out.
Because that's how our court systems work.
 
Yes I understand the bail process completely (I've bailed a few friends out) their already a criminal by being here illegality why should they have bond / bail just to skip on it they abused the system so send them home, were not playing base ball and its 3 strikes your out.

Because that's how our legal system works. It's built to presume innocent until one's guilt is proven in a court.
 
Because that's how our legal system works. It's built to presume innocent until one's guilt is proven in a court.

ORRRR!!! Until you get enough rioters around the court and congress critters from other states flying in to threaten the jury into the politically correct verdict.

That's how Democrats do things in the USA.
 
It should..
Whether or not it should is a slightly more personal question. I don't believe that a government that can be overthrown (easily) by it citizens is actually a government. They are hall monitors at best and nobody is going to care if you shove them into a locker (do students still have lockers or are we too broke to educate our kids? Nothing I've heard suggests we started funding teachers and that was a serious issue 20 years ago. They do need a monopoly on violence just to operate.
 
Whether or not it should is a slightly more personal question. I don't believe that a government that can be overthrown (easily) by it citizens is actually a government. They are hall monitors at best and nobody is going to care if you shove them into a locker (do students still have lockers or are we too broke to educate our kids? Nothing I've heard suggests we started funding teachers and that was a serious issue 20 years ago. They do need a monopoly on violence just to operate.
A government that can be easily be overthrown by its citizens? You write some pretty dumb stuff. LOL
 
Lobby for change.

Good luck.

Why? Won't do any good.

Especially when the majority want the USA to stop existing and are undermining it's borders and democracy every chance they get.

I don't really care, the USA is already DEAD, we're just waiting for the twitching/flopping around to stop and the dust to settle.
 
I get that you think that, but your fantasies have nothing to do with the facts.
Keep on whining on
Truly when a basic premise of court proceedings become the fault of your political opposition....you're whining
 
Last edited:
A government that can be easily be overthrown by its citizens? You write some pretty dumb stuff. LOL
You write some silly shit because you know if we dig into the law you're just wrong. The 2nd was actually written to keep assholes like you (and my ancestors) in check not to stop Biden from doing the Macarena.
 
Back
Top