Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Whatever dear. God forbid the current crop never sees what existed. If it's such a useless thread unlock it.catalina_francisco said:Interesting piece of history but I am thinking there is probably a bigger wealth of information in the combination of threads and topics discussed since the beginning of the forum to present day, with more to come. Nostalgia is nice but as Tainted B said elsewhere, most of these people don't post here anymore and though some of us miss some of them and their wisdom, the present is so much more interesting and relevant to the majority of today's posters, no? Being a history buff myself, I can appreciate history, but also like to think we are moving forward, adding new experiences, creating new stories and journey's to share with others ....and of course we then create more information for the library while still maintaining a fully operating discussion board which has a life of it's own.
Catalina![]()
AngelicAssassin said:Whatever dear. God forbid the current crop never sees what existed. If it's such a useless thread unlock it.
No insult intended, but it took 5 seconds to find the link to the mother thread. It's at the tail end of the forum listing. i don't think any of the newer posters realize the BDSM forum didn't exist in Lit at one time. If anyone wished to post on BDSM in an area they knew would be seen, one thread existed as part of another forum. Consider my pointing the old thread out a "Hey, lookie here for a little nugget of gold you might have missed."crimsonlace said:Question for AA, though.
I am having a problem correlating the posting of this thread with your practice of posting links to existing threads for new posters. To my mind, one promotes learning, the other compartmentalizes to the point of obscurity.
Would it be disrespectful to ask where the line lies with you?
catalina_francisco said:Interesting piece of history but I am thinking there is probably a bigger wealth of information in the combination of threads and topics discussed since the beginning of the forum to present day, with more to come. Nostalgia is nice but as Tainted B said elsewhere, most of these people don't post here anymore and though some of us miss some of them and their wisdom, the present is so much more interesting and relevant to the majority of today's posters, no? Being a history buff myself, I can appreciate history, but also like to think we are moving forward, adding new experiences, creating new stories and journey's to share with others ....and of course we then create more information for the library while still maintaining a fully operating discussion board which has a life of it's own.
Catalina![]()
cellis said:It is a shame that the past is not appreciated. There was so much growth in that thread... I too miss it. Perhaps many of the older posters no longer post here because their opinions and experiences are not appreciated.
AngelicAssassin said:Whatever dear. God forbid the current crop never sees what existed. If it's such a useless thread unlock it.
AngelicAssassin said:No insult intended, but it took 5 seconds to find the link to the mother thread. It's at the tail end of the forum listing. i don't think any of the newer posters realize the BDSM forum didn't exist in Lit at one time. If anyone wished to post on BDSM in an area they knew would be seen, one thread existed as part of another forum. Consider my pointing the old thread out a "Hey, lookie here for a little nugget of gold you might have missed."
i'll take a stab at your question although i may not understand it. Where the line lies with me? If you've gone through the library, and taken an honest shot at doing a general search, i don't begrudge someone asking a question based on lack of information, apparent, or real. Regardless of the new thread poster's expertise, laziness, whatever, if i can find something in either the library or by doing a search, i'll answer the question asked to the general "you" population.
Does that not answer the question posted by the new thread originator? Does an opinion fostered 3 years ago lose efficacy over time? If the poster of that opinion no longer hangs out here, is that opinion less vailid than those that remain?
It might, but then again you have threads like Wishes and Problems, or Invitation to Participate with one response that had no link, yet 12 and 37 views respectively. i'm sure they appreciate the multiple views with no response rather than direction to something relative to their subject matter.crimsonlace said:Often, I think that answering an initial post by a new poster with links to old threads can squelch their creative input to our forum.
This is just my opinion... I could be wrong.![]()