"If you're a criminal, you will be deported."

M

miles

Guest
"Obama seems to forget that entering the country illegally is in fact a federal crime."

-Katie Pavlich
 
"Obama seems to forget that entering the country illegally is in fact a federal crime."

-Katie Pavlich

Not to mention how many of the innocent hard-workers committed identity fraud.

Then again, so did the President...
 
Irrespective of a philosophical or ideological position, how could there be a blatant disregard for a bona fide LAW of the United States (and every other country on the planet, for that matter)?
You're entitled to your stupid John Lennon "Imagine" fantasy, but you can't simply decide, based on your opinion, that a law is no longer a law.
 
Pointing to previous, non controversial executive actions to comport with the will of congress is being held up as support for executive action in direct and open defiance of the stated will of congress.

We have a king and he cannot be questioned, much less removed because he is "historic."
 
Throb goes to great lengths to prove to everyone he's the world's biggest fucking idiot.

Mission accomplished!
 
Irrespective of a philosophical or ideological position, how could there be a blatant disregard for a bona fide LAW of the United States (and every other country on the planet, for that matter)?
You're entitled to your stupid John Lennon "Imagine" fantasy, but you can't simply decide, based on your opinion, that a law is no longer a law.

It's the result of moral relativism. Who are you to judge?

John actually got more conservative. It's why he wrote "Taxman" and moved to New York...

:(

The rejoinder will be, YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT HAPPENED TO HIS KID!!!

:(

Remember, President Obama, the Constitutional Scholar, is on record as being opposed to that "Charter of Negative Liberties." He truly believes that he was elected to do great things and that he is justified, because of his election and reelection, in doing those transformative changes to the America voting public even if he does not have a plurality from election-to-election, as per Gruber, those people are too stupid to know what is good for them.
 
But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society.

To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the founding fathers in the Constitution, at least as its been interpreted and Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the Federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the Federal government or State government must do on your behalf...,

Barack Hussein Obama
2001 Radio Interview
 
What do people expect when they elect a president that may not even be a citizen?
 
Back
Top