If we dont win, you'll be sorry

badbabysitter

Vault Girl
Joined
Jul 6, 2002
Posts
19,179
A Republican candidate in the U.S. Congressional elections has claimed that an armed overthrow of the Obama government is 'on the table'.

In an outburst in a TV interview, Pastor Stephen Broden said that if the Democrats did not lose their majority in Congress next month, some would look beyond the democratic process.

'Our nation was founded on violence,' he added. 'The option is on the table. I don't think that we should ever remove anything from the table as it relates to our liberties and our freedoms.'

Broden, who is seeking to unseat the Democrat Eddie Bernice Johnson in Dallas, said however that armed revolution was 'not the first option'.

Opinion polls predict a big Republican win on November 2 when voters elect all 435 members of the House of Representatives and 37 of the 100 senators in the Senate.
Broden, who is running for election to the House of Representatives, was endorsed earlier this month by the influential Dallas Morning News.

'Tyrannical': During a Tea Party event in Forth Worth last year, Mr said people had the right to remove governments that were not working

The black pastor is frequently controversial and has long been a popular speaker at conservative rallies.

Last year he suggested that President Obama's healthcare legislation was intended to send elderly people to early graves to save money.

In January, Republican Sharron Angle, who is running neck-and-neck with Senate Leader Harry Reid in Nevada, said Americans might seek 'Second Amendment remedies' to their problems with government. The Second Amendment refers to the public's right to bear weapons.

Jonathan Neerman, head of the Dallas County Republican Party, told the Dallas Morning News: 'It is a disappointing, isolated incident.'

Ken Emanuelson, a Broden supporter and tea party organiser in the city, said he did not disagree with the 'philosophical point' of removing a tyrannical government.

In June 2009, Mr Broden described the financial crisis in banking, housing and manufacturing as 'contrived' and 'set up' by the Obama administration.

He also criticised Americans for not being more outraged at government intervention, and compared them to Jews 'walking into the furnaces' during the Holocaust.

But he distanced himself from the remarks during the interview and said he had mistakenly linked the U.S. to Nazi Germany.

The Republican candidate has sought to make political gain from Mrs Johnson over her misuse of scholarship funds from the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation.

In August, the Dallas Morning News reported that Mrs Johnson provided 23 scholarships to two of her grandsons, two children of her nephew and two children of one of her aides.
None of them was eligible under the foundation's rules or residency requirements.

She has since repaid the foundation $31,000.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...Obama-government-table.html?ito=feeds-newsxml
 
Yes, it's last weeks news. He's probably no further out there than the President himself calling half the country "the enemy."

I'm pretty sure the President didnt suggest incitng violence if anyone loses...and the whole enemy thing is kinda funny.. pundits and politicians and pundits use it all the time.. the non-issue about it is that the right is taking offense to their own tactics being used against them
 
Yes, it's last weeks news. He's probably no further out there than the President himself calling half the country "the enemy."
Unless you're talking about something else than the latino voter comment, that's not what he said.
 
Last edited:
Unless you're talking about something else than the latino voter comment, that's not what he said.

Of course, his side has no problem demonizing Hispanics and other assorted brown-skinned people with non-Anglo-Saxon names to "real Americans" (i.e., white Americans) as the "enemy" indirectly and directly for the better part of two years for political gain.

No problem whatsoever.
 
If there's a second civil war, I say let them go. This Red State/Blue State thing is dragging all of us back to the Stone Age.

New York City should become an independent, sovereign nation. Like Singapore, but without the caning.

Oh wait...
 
Thomas Jefferson thought violence is good for fertilizing the tree of liberty. The government should always worry about revolt.

"God forbid we should ever be twenty years without such a rebellion.
The people cannot be all, and always, well informed. The part which is
wrong will be discontented, in proportion to the importance of the facts
they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions,
it is lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty. ...
And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not
warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of
resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as
to the facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost
in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from
time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
It is its natural manure." TJ
 
Last edited by a moderator:
he also believed in the seperation of church and state..and the conservative run texas school board will no longer teach this
 
republicans are slated to win a lot of seats, so I do not know what the crying and blathering is about.

And no, there will be no second civil war. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 
Jesus Christ, do you think in any other context except race??:rolleyes:

It sure makes a big-ass difference to you and your ilk when you want it to, though. So go clean your fucking mirror before you start misquoting Obama's words for your convenience and trying to tell me what to think about what makes you shit, because it ain't what I'm eating.
 
"We're gonna punish our enemies and we're gonna reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us ."

He said this while talking to Latinos about the election and the immigration issue. Over half of America is against him on immigration and his heath care issue, so they are the "enemy." Learn how to read, he wasn't mis-quoted.

What part of "figurative expression" do you not understand? Why is it that your side can call for an armed insurrection in the figurative sense if things don't go their way and it's all gravy with you?

If you aren't an "enemy," then why the fuck do you care? You, who has no problem labeling Muslims and other people different from you as an enemy when it's convenient for you, even when they're Americans. Don't tell me, you use the word enemy figuratively and not literally, right? Of course you do.

You and yours live in a totally different universe than the many other kinds of people in this country. No wonder that you hate it when the same rhetoric is used against you. Obviously you have a reason to feel it ain't figurative when describing you to a T, huh?
 
Wrinkles Angle from Nevada said the same thing. We need a second amendment remedy and we need to take Harry Reid out first.

 
"We're gonna punish our enemies and we're gonna reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us ."

He said this while talking to Latinos about the election and the immigration issue. Over half of America is against him on immigration and his heath care issue, so they are the "enemy." Learn how to read, he wasn't mis-quoted.
"If Latinos sit out the election instead of saying, "We’re going to punish our enemies and we’re gonna’ reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us," if they don’t see that kind of upsurge in voting in this election, then I think it’s going to be harder and that’s why I think it’s so important that people focus on voting on November 2."
-B. Obama, politician, Washington DC

Learn how to read indeed.

And if you don't get the difference between that context ad the one you erroneously posted, learn how to think.
 
Last edited:
"If Latinos sit out the election instead of saying, "We’re going to punish our enemies and we’re gonna’ reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us," if they don’t see that kind of upsurge in voting in this election, then I think it’s going to be harder and that’s why I think it’s so important that people focus on voting on November 2."
-B. Obama, politician, Washington DC

Learn how to read indeed.

And if you don't get the difference between that context ad the one you erroneously posted, learn how to think.

Thank you.

I swear to fucking Buddha these assholes honestly think that they're the only ones living in the world. Fucking amazing.
 
The American Revolution was a violent reaction to the existing government, as was the Civil War.

Violence is a political debate by action rather than words.
 
I'm pretty sure the President didnt suggest incitng violence if anyone loses...and the whole enemy thing is kinda funny.. pundits and politicians and pundits use it all the time.. the non-issue about it is that the right is taking offense to their own tactics being used against them

Who said anything about inciting?
 
republicans are slated to win a lot of seats, so I do not know what the crying and blathering is about.

And no, there will be no second civil war. :rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

vetteman, busybody, aj, and ishmale can't even be bothered to go to a tea bagger rally... you think they'd actually put themselves on the line to pick up a gun and fight for something they believe in?

We're completely safe from an armed insurrection from these geezers.
 
Yes, it's last weeks news. He's probably no further out there than the President himself calling half the country "the enemy."

Rory alts are so easy to spot. They are all anti republicans and anti white.
 
Rory alts are so easy to spot. They are all anti republicans and anti white.

Hi drippingpenis4

so what you're saying is that everyone who is left-wing is a rory alt?

did rory not send you flowers?

you really have to give up on this unrequited love thing you got going on
 
Back
Top