If Sharpton is upset about Selma.....

I don't....in fact I believe that both the grand jury's decision and the DOJ's decision are correct! I believe that Sharpton is nothing but a race baiter.

Then why did you start a thread in which you speculate about his feelings? I don't care if he is upset or not... why do you?
 
Sharpton is a race baiter. I don't know one black person who has anything good to say about him, most can't stomach him because at the end of the day he rather make excuses for the behavior of the trouble makers than do anything for the people really looking to better themselves.

The fact he wasn't all over that 12 year old kid getting shot by the cops in Cleveland tells me he just didn't think he could get anyone to riot over there and not enough face time.
 
Sharpton is a race baiter. I don't know one black person who has anything good to say about him, most can't stomach him because at the end of the day he rather make excuses for the behavior of the trouble makers than do anything for the people really looking to better themselves.

Obama likes him enough to invite him to the White House 80 times.

Lie with dogs and wake up with fleas.
 
She asked him a direct question suggesting if she wasn't interested, neither should he be, a bit arrogant even for our lady F. We realize this angle was completely lost on your ignorant/arrogant ass.

There was no "angle" and Lady F had a salient point. Which will go unexplained, naturally. Because Sharpton is always just a needless name toss for people pretending it means something.

You pressed fuckers need to learn new names. Get on different media and learn current shit before the last bus leaves you behind.
 
She asked him a direct question suggesting if she wasn't interested, neither should he be, a bit arrogant even for our lady F. We realize this angle was completely lost on your ignorant/arrogant ass.

That's not what happened at all, tubby.
 
Maybe your take on things isn't what other people consider when they decide to start a thread.

It has nothing to do with my "take" on anything. The OP wondered about Sharpton's feelings, so I asked him/her why he cares so much about how Sharpton feels. It is a legit question.
 
She asked him a direct question suggesting if she wasn't interested, neither should he be, a bit arrogant even for our lady F. We realize this angle was completely lost on your ignorant/arrogant ass.

No I suggested nothing. I asked why the OP is so concerned with Sharpton's feelings. Personally I don't care about Sharpton's feelings at all, so it would be interested in hearing the OPs rational for caring for the feelings of a stranger.

I would guess that Shaprton has lost at blackjack before and felt upset about it. I don't care. Does the OP?
 
We learned new names when Obama and Holder showed up to reinforce and polish Sharpton and his shakedown operation.

Who are the new names you learned? I keep seeing names from the '80s and '90s stuck on repeat. They had you pressed then, they keep you pressed now.

The liberal megaphone MSNBC employs Sharpton to widen the racial divide in America by telling fairy tales about white oppression to the ignorant

The only bitches screaming about "the fairy tales" of white oppression are you fuckers. Maybe it hits home a little too close since this isn't the 1980s anymore and nobody's just sitting down and buying your cheap sells. Maybe you should do some in-house cleaning first before getting verklempt over movies that don't focus on your savior narratives because they don't need to and popping nuts over refurbished sociopathic cowboys who kill people from a distance.
 
No I suggested nothing. I asked why the OP is so concerned with Sharpton's feelings. Personally I don't care about Sharpton's feelings at all, so it would be interested in hearing the OPs rational for caring for the feelings of a stranger.

I would guess that Shaprton has lost at blackjack before and felt upset about it. I don't care. Does the OP?

Your assumption that the OP had concerns about Sharptons feelings is incorrect. As the OP I was trying to point out the irony that he had his panties in a wad over the movie and now in spite of the rhetoric and promises that Holder made, the cop is not being charged with a crime...because no crime was committed. As for his personal feelings......I could give a rats ass
 
Your assumption that the OP had concerns about Sharptons feelings is incorrect. As the OP I was trying to point out the irony that he had his panties in a wad over the movie and now in spite of the rhetoric and promises that Holder made, the cop is not being charged with a crime...because no crime was committed. As for his personal feelings......I could give a rats ass

No, "if sharpton is upset... he'll really be pissed..." is a direct query into his personal feelings. Now had you written, "If Sharpton marches in the streets..." that would be a critique of his actions. But you aren't critiquing his actions, you are critiquing his personal feelings.

I find that a strange use of your personal time. But it's your life so have at it.
 
No, "if sharpton is upset... he'll really be pissed..." is a direct query into his personal feelings. Now had you written, "If Sharpton marches in the streets..." that would be a critique of his actions. But you aren't critiquing his actions, you are critiquing his personal feelings.

I find that a strange use of your personal time. But it's your life so have at it.

whatever
 
Sharpton is such an asshole that most people like the idea of his being distressed.
 
Back
Top