If burning the American Flag voids a person's 1A rights, then supporting a dictatorship in America voids a person's 2A rights

Pretty much. I don't think Trump has an agenda in the usual sense. Consistency is not important to him. He acts from the gut. I doubt he has ever read the project 2025 protect and doesn't care whats in it. That's not to say his actions wont sometimes mirror what that plan wants.
Except the the Orange Baffoon is doing the bidding or giving power to all those who write the Manifesto.

So? At this point, not even a year into this horror, what percent of the Manifesto or the 4th Reich are completed?
 
Sorry… it’s not Hatred of Trump
It’s losing your free will
He told you DON’T Believe what you see
He is following Mussilini’s lessons
Just keep telling the lie again and again
Just fucking break the law in front of people’s faces and dare them to do something
Discredit the NEWS… call it fake.. offer alternative “facts”
Create SHEEP

You are just saying Bahhhhh!

I don’t have to listen to crazy cult like sheep with TDS!
 
Sorry… it’s not Hatred of Trump
It’s losing your free will
He told you DON’T Believe what you see
He is following Mussilini’s lessons
Just keep telling the lie again and again
Just fucking break the law in front of people’s faces and dare them to do something
Discredit the NEWS… call it fake.. offer alternative “facts”
Create SHEEP

You are just saying Bahhhhh!

I don’t have to listen to crazy cult like sheep with TDS!
516240845_1335398601279208_3343733826194425625_n (1).jpg
 
This thread continues to trigger Deplorables very nicely.

They must be scared. :)
 
If you actually read the President's executive order, which the OP linked to, it's completely empty. It says that it only applies to flag-burning that is conducted in cases that might be criminal under other laws for other reasons. It doesn't directly overturn the Supreme Court precedent, and it's not likely to have any lasting impact. This was a silly executive order for show, like so many of Trump's orders, but I wouldn't worry too much about it being used as precedent for anything in the future.
Indeed! Far better for your President to issue executive orders that are meaningless (or unenforceable) than for him to actually issue executive orders that actually DO anything!
 
Indeed! Far better for your President to issue executive orders that are meaningless (or unenforceable) than for him to actually issue executive orders that actually DO anything!

I'm not saying it's good. It's not. It's absurd. But the absurdity of it takes a little away from the probability of it being an awful precedent. These kinds of executive orders won't be taken seriously in the long run.
 
Back
Top