I warned you that the Republicans are out to kill people

LJ_Reloaded

バクスター の
Joined
Apr 3, 2010
Posts
21,217
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/03/tanf-emergency-fund-end-near-welfare-to-work_n_705381.html

TANF Emergency Fund, Welfare-To-Work Program That Created 240,000 Jobs, Nears End

First Posted: 09- 3-10 05:24 PM | Updated: 09- 3-10 05:47 PM

Advocates of a welfare-to-work program created by last year's stimulus bill are calling on Congress not to jeopardize some 240,000 jobs by letting the program expire at the end of September.

Republicans and a handful of moderate Senate Democrats blocked a reauthorization of TANF Emergency Fund back in March. The progressive Center on Budget and Policy Priorities reported Thursday that as the program's Sept. 30 horizon looms, "states are ramping down their subsidized jobs programs, stopping new placements and giving notice that existing jobs will end."

"They're telling the moms once the fund ends, you're going to have to work for free," Diana Spatz told HuffPost Friday in an interview. Spatz is the executive director of Lifetime, a California membership organization that helps low-income parents pursuing post-secondary education that employs eight moms and two dads thanks to the program. "They can work through the end of this month and then I think we're going to be able to keep two or three of them, but we aren't sure," she said.

Further funding has already been approved by the House, and Spatz is hoping it will reach the Senate floor quickly after the Senate returns from its August recess on Sept. 13.

"It's really a shame on a number of levels," Sam Tuttleman, director of the Employment Services Department of the Alameda Social Services Agency, said of the program's likely demise. Tuttleman said the program is currently funding some 1,100 jobs in Alameda County and has had other benefits as well.

"There's a pretty negative view about 'welfare clients' in the employer community," he said. "One of the things this has done is it really has changed the perspective of a lot of our employers because they've gotten good employees who've really worked out for them.'"

Tuttleman said he's heard anecdotally that some businesses would keep the people they hired through the program, and that his agency would be conducting a survey of businesses in the next month. Conservatives outside of Congress have praised the Emergency Fund as the most direct way to create private-sector jobs and "because it actually has worked."
Story continues below
Advertisement

"It's been as positive an initiative for job creation as you can make," House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told reporters after a speech at San Francisco State University on Thursday. "Unfortunately -- you'll hear me say this many times -- we have passed it over and over again in the House, waiting for some action from the Senate."

Christine Owens, director of the National Employment Law Project, said that Friday's sorry jobs report for August showed the need to preserve the program.

"The emergency fund has tremendously helped states create new employment opportunities. By reauthorizing it, even more states will have the opportunity to take advantage of millions in jobs subsidies," said Owens. "If Congress fails to reauthorize the Fund, those subsidies will vanish along with the job opportunities they provide. Continuing the TANF Emergency Fund is a concrete step Congress can take to create jobs, along with passage of larger-scale programs like the Local Jobs for America Act."
 
That's quite a stretch...



Any idea of where we can actually get the money to continue paying for it?


Shouldn't that title be moderate Democrats side with Radicals to kill people?
 
That's quite a stretch...
Welcome to the General Board. I could have sworn I've seen you around here before, but I must have you mistaken for somebody else.

For your further interactions with the denizens here, please bear in mind that "quite a stretch" is the by far dominating mode of conversation in these waters.
 
I just want to see pictures of the bodies...




During Katrina, the Superdome was supposed to have them stacked like cordwood, turns out just to have been a stretch...

;) ;)
 
Shouldn't that title be moderate Democrats side with Radicals to kill people?

There is a bias in that statement. You state the existence of moderate Democrats, and that implies some Democrats are not moderate, i.e. liberal Democrats and conservative Democrats.

Yet you brand all Republicans as "Radicals." Clearly, Republicans can be moderate, and conservative. Even liberal Republicans exist.
 
There is a bias in that statement. You state the existence of moderate Democrats, and that implies some Democrats are not moderate, i.e. liberal Democrats and conservative Democrats.

Yet you brand all Republicans as "Radicals." Clearly, Republicans can be moderate, and conservative. Even liberal Republicans exist.

Stick around for a few hundred posts and you'll not only "get" me and my humor, but you'll soon come to understand that LJ (affectionately known by his first alt, LT) is a total loon-a-tick-tick-tick-...


Ain't that right LT!?
 
Stick around for a few hundred posts and you'll not only "get" me and my humor, but you'll soon come to understand that LJ (affectionately known by his first alt, LT) is a total loon-a-tick-tick-tick-...


Ain't that right LT!?
In order for us to "get" your humor, you need to post some once in a while.
 
Back
Top