I Want To Explain The Kinetic Theory Of Heat To The Newbies

Dillinger

Guerrilla Ontologist
Joined
Sep 19, 2000
Posts
26,152
The conventional kinetic theory of Heat says that Heat is random chaotic molecular collisions & vibrations.

Reductio ad Absurdum Proof:
1) Chaos - means disorder and confusion and inability recognise or obey laws.
2) Random - means having no specific pattern or purpose .
3) Laws in thermodynamics are precise
4) To obey precise thermodynamics laws with chaos & random? Impossible!

Anyone care to discuss the validity of the original theory or its absurdity? Perhaps including a description of the mean free path?

Latent Heat?

The laws of Boyle and Gay-Lussac?

Whether the influence of the molecular forces must be infinitesimal?

Avogadro's proposal?

Rotational motion?
 
Isn't that the theory of Microwave Ovens?
Doesn't everyone at Lit use their microwave ovens to cook so they have time to post here?

Or is it the heat produced by the in and out motion?

I think latent heat is what the stories here generate. Yep. That's it.
 
Oh my! And all of this time I was lusting after what I thought was a manatee. This is so embarassing.
 
ksmybuttons said:
Isn't that the theory of Microwave Ovens?
Doesn't everyone at Lit use their microwave ovens to cook so they have time to post here?

Or is it the heat produced by the in and out motion?

I think latent heat is what the stories here generate. Yep. That's it.

Actually - all this time I thought I was using my microwave oven to post here at Lit.
 
Olivianna said:
Oh my! And all of this time I was lusting after what I thought was a manatee. This is so embarassing.

So... you have a thing for Marine Mammals?
 
Well since one of the concepts of lit can be "get hot fast," the microwave can be a posting choice.
 
Dill, you're so sexy when you pull obscure physics proofs out of your ass...especially when you warp them in the process...;)

I'll discuss Avogrado's hypothesis with you, but only if we can also talk about Perko's work on Chaos math and its application to the Singularity in the context of black holes and infinite mass regression at the furthest reaches of space-time possibility.
:D
 
She was sitting at her computer reading the threads. Nothing enticing at the moment, and then, the Avatar of all Avatars. It was a monolith rising from the screen.

Pulling out her favorite vib, she quickly made herself cum dreaming of wrapping her arms and legs around that phallus, knowing she could climb that huge pole.

Sex. Hard, Fast, Microwave Sex.
 
Dillinger said:


So... you have a thing for Marine Mammals?
No - that's the funny thing. I have a thing for unicellular organisms. I only *thought* that I was hot for manatees because...oh, well, I'll just stop now.
 
Dillinger said:
Latent Heat?

Yes, that chick is hot.

The laws of Boyle and Gay-Lussac?

Nah. They dropped charges.

Whether the influence of the molecular forces must be infinitesimal?

... Are you saying that just because I'm not 10" of meat that I'm small. I am so fucking insulted.

Avogadro's proposal?

I politely declined... he has the whole male thing going on.

Rotational motion?

:mad: You think you're so damn funny. Go sit on it and spin, yourself, buddy.

:eek:

:cool:
 
Of course thehe one person at Lit who would actually know when I'm blowing smoke out my ass shows up for the first time in like a week!

Hey RisiaSkye...

I can understand how chaos theory might apply to a better understanding of heat - but how would you apply fractals to that? Or are you just throwing a wrench in the works in order to bring up transhumanist discussion of the singularity? I'm having a hard time conceiving this... (*LOL*)
 
Dillinger said:
Of course thehe one person at Lit who would actually know when I'm blowing smoke out my ass shows up for the first time in like a week!
:cool:
It's all part of the plan, darlin'. :D

Hey RisiaSkye...

I can understand how chaos theory might apply to a better understanding of heat - but how would you apply fractals to that?
Homoclinic bifurcation (fractals) are actually a function of non-chaotic waveform repetition, and thus have already pretty fully been incorporated into theories about thermodynamics as they applied to gravitational forces, anyway. The fractal pattern represents recursive motion within sub-atomic "space"--bringing us back to Avogrado and the valences of electron circuits, something I never did really grasp fully.

Or are you just throwing a wrench in the works in order to bring up transhumanist discussion of the singularity? I'm having a hard time conceiving this... (*LOL*)
I *DO* love a good monkey wrench.
But, I'm definitely not headed for a transhumanist discussion so much as a conditional endorsement of the holographic effect of universe dispersal around the singularity, particularly as it applies to the implicit collision of space-time with infinite regression patterns of gravitational force and thermodynamic resistance models.

Heh. We talk big hokum. :D
 
Ah.. I see. As in the Homoclinic bifurcation in a Hodgkin-Huxley model of thermally sensitive neurons? The control parameter being temperature. That's pretty cool.

And - I have to admit - I thought at first you were blowing a bit of phooey around yourself with throwing the singlularity in - not having made the connection between thermodynamic resistance models and the singularity.

Very cool. I think I have some homework to do.
 
Dillinger said:
Ah.. I see. As in the Homoclinic bifurcation in a Hodgkin-Huxley model of thermally sensitive neurons? The control parameter being temperature. That's pretty cool.
Yeah, it's neat stuff, though I don't know the specifics of the model you named. Obscure physics is one of the only things that makes my father in law tolerable, actually--that he knows such things, and gives me interesting stuff to read.

And - I have to admit - I thought at first you were blowing a bit of phooey around yourself with throwing the singlularity in - not having made the connection between thermodynamic resistance models and the singularity.
Well, I *am* talking out my ass here, in that I'm not at all qualified to speculate on such things as astronomy and astro-physics, but that never stops me. On the other hand, I'm not entirely making shit up, either. I didn't spend all those years right by Embry-Riddle for nothing. ;) And, I *have* done as much of the relevant reading as one could reasonably expect from a lay-person with other priorities.

The moral of the story is: nobody out-bullshits me, buckaroo! :D
 
Laurel, if it'll make you feel better, I'll translate:

Dill: I'm smart!
Risia: You're cute when you're full of it. But I still wanna be smart like you!
Dill: Okay, you can be smart, but I'm smart too! (Don't tell anyone we're full of it anymore, 'kay?)
Risia: Okay, we're smart! (No, let's never acknowledge how colossally full of hooey we are. Agreed?) Hey, where did everyone go?

:D
 
RisiaSkye said:
Laurel, if it'll make you feel better, I'll translate:

Dill: I'm smart!
Risia: You're cute when you're full of it. But I still wanna be smart like you!
Dill: Okay, you can be smart, but I'm smart too! (Don't tell anyone we're full of it anymore, 'kay?)
Risia: Okay, we're smart! (No, let's never acknowledge how colossally full of hooey we are. Agreed?) Hey, where did everyone go?

:D

:D
 
Back
Top