I support Keith Ellison for the DNC chair!

water505

Literotica Guru
Joined
Nov 6, 2016
Posts
4,517
He is eminently qualified to take the party further down the road to oblivion. Stupid is the Democrat plan and they're sticking with it.

Please don't change direction.
 
He is eminently qualified to take the party further down the road to oblivion. Stupid is the Democrat plan and they're sticking with it.

Please don't change direction.

Do you think that the G00P are really making new fans - young fans - with #45 in charge?
Also - STFU, miles.
 
The DNC could truly do absolutely no greater service to American patriots in general than elect the Muslim little Brother as their next Socialist State of America figurehead.

#AllahAkbar,Mofos!
 
The DNC could truly do absolutely no greater service to American patriots in general than elect the Muslim little Brother as their next Socialist State of America figurehead.

#AllahAkbar,Mofos!
After two years of having the Christian right in charge, I'm sure that will be the case.
 
THE Orange Don is now the Christian right???


Who needs Ellison to damage the brand when there are voters like you out there?
 
The real war hasn't started.

The real war is Obama and the Negros on one side, and Hillary and the Stupid Whites on the other.

Trumps struggle is to cleanse the GOP of the Bush lovers.

At the end of the day we'll have a Black Democrat Party, a Hillary/Bush Elite Party, and a Trump Populist Party for cops, military, and working stiffs.
 
He is eminently qualified to take the party further down the road to oblivion. Stupid is the Democrat plan and they're sticking with it.

Please don't change direction.

The real problem is, does the GOP have enough balls left to oppose him in debate and call him what he is, or is it going to be too politically incorrect to bring up his radical Islamic background and Marxist mindset? Will they let him slid like they have so many others?
 
The real problem is, does the GOP have enough balls left to oppose him in debate and call him what he is, or is it going to be too politically incorrect to bring up his radical Islamic background and Marxist mindset? Will they let him slid like they have so many others?

Nor with Marxism.
 
Nor with Marxism.

Actually, he's endorsed by the Communist Party USA. We know they always endorse free enterprise capitalists, right?



Keith Hakim, better known as Keith Ellison wrote the following anti-American mumbo jumbo:

“Since no one but the WASP elite really appreciates affirmative action, I have a challenge for all fair-minded middle- and working-class white people: I will urge black people to abandon white-dominated, integration-oriented, give-away programs, if you urge white people to justly compensate black people for 250 years of slavery, 90 years of Jim Crow and 25 years of neo-Jim Crow.

The settlement could be a straight cash transfer for all the black exploitation. This means just compensation for all the labor hours put in by the slaves and just compensation for all the intellectual and artistic property ripped off by all the Elvis Presleys and Pat Boones. It means compensation for all the money ripped off through sharecropping and just compensation owing to all the black athletes of yesterday, such as Jack Jefferson and Joe Louis. It means back payment of the ‘black tax,’ which is the price hike that ghetto merchants and pawnbrokers charge black consumers.”


“Finally, blacks would have the option of choosing their own land base or remaining in the United States. Since black people toiled most diligently in the southeastern section of the United States, this land, quite naturally, would be most suitable. That means Arkansas, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana and Mississippi. Blacks, of course, would not be compelled to move to the black state, and, of course, peaceful whites would not be compelled to move away.

This is a bargain.

Whites would be relieved of the burdens of the black-faced but white-dominated social programs. Blacks would employ themselves, teach their own children the truth and control their own neighborhoods. Black-white interaction would be voluntary instead of compelled. No more busing, no more affirmative action and, best of all, no more white guilt. White people could righteously say they have ‘settled their debts with blacks. Urban blacks, long alienated from society by poverty, forced segregation and media-vilification, would no longer strike fear in whites. Think of it, whites could reclaim their cities — without dispossessing anyone.

Now the liberals may oppose this reparations program because, of course, they justify their existence by championing so-called lost causes.”

The rest here:
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/11/26/k...-a-separate-country-for-blacks/#ixzz4ZWZ6J98O
 
The chairman of the party does three things, primarily: raises money, allocates resources, and helps to recruit candidates. It is NOT primarily or even secondarily a messaging operation. The idea that the head of the DNC will serve as some sort of "face of the party" is ridiculous; whoever wins will be about as significant a public figure as Reince Preibus was these last four years. The Wikileaks stuff and the whining from the Sanders diehards have given a completely false impression of the power of the national party apparatus.

Having said that, the Democrats allowing this leadership contest to drag on so long and become such a public spectacle is 100% on them.
 
The chairman of the party does three things, primarily: raises money, allocates resources, and helps to recruit candidates. It is NOT primarily or even secondarily a messaging operation. The idea that the head of the DNC will serve as some sort of "face of the party" is ridiculous; whoever wins will be about as significant a public figure as Reince Preibus was these last four years. The Wikileaks stuff and the whining from the Sanders diehards have given a completely false impression of the power of the national party apparatus.

Having said that, the Democrats allowing this leadership contest to drag on so long and become such a public spectacle is 100% on them.

Guess you forgot about seeing Debbie "what's a Clue" Shultz on every TV network for two years spouting the "party line," eh?
 
While the national media has been focused on the two most famous names competing to head up the Democratic National Committee, Pete Buttigieg, the mayor of South Bend, Indiana, has quietly built up a sizable base of support of his own away from the spotlight.

Those efforts may pay off. It’s starting to look as though the two leading candidates, former Labor Secretary Tom Perez and Rep. Keith Ellison of Minnesota, may have enough commitments from DNC members to split the vote for each other but not enough to actually win. Many of their supporters have come to dislike the other top candidate in the running. That’s particularly true with regard to some of Ellison’s backers, several of whom have been saying that electing Perez to chair the Democrats would render the party “irrelevant.” Ellison supporters have also allegedly confronted some Perez supporters in a harassing manner, according to several news reports.

That just might open up a spot for the 35-year-old Buttigieg to have some real leverage in the race, especially since in recent weeks he has managed to garner a surprising number of high-profile endorsements, including from former presidential candidate Martin O’Malley and past DNC chairs Ed Rendell, Steve Grossman, David Wilhelm and Joe Andrew. On Wednesday morning, Howard Dean, the former Vermont governor, presidential candidate and DNC chair, joined them in giving his support to Buttigieg. (In case you’re wondering, it’s pronounced Boo-ti-JUDGE).

Meet the DNC dark horse: Indiana mayor Pete Buttigieg is shaking up the race for Democratic chair... http://www.salon.com/2017/02/22/mee...-mayor-pete-buttigieg-in-party-chair-contest/
 
You have to give Dems credit. They consistently put reprehensible pieces of shit in this job.
 
Back
Top