I need 4 or more people for a thought experiement.

[Todd-'o'-Vision]

I would like to have:

2 people for Group A:

Group A would consist of Whomever would like to consider themself the most articulate Democrat or leftist or liberal which everyou want to call yourself {Lavender, Thumper, Weevil Mishcka would be good canadates} just one who ever consideres themselves up for the fun. Thier partner in this thought experiement would be the most articulate right winger, conservatice, libertarian, republican {Uncle Bill, Cheyenne, Miles, Ismael would be good canadates} just one whoever considers themselves up for it.

This thought experiment will be called Right versus Left or vice Versa

2 people for Group B:

Group B would consist of whomever considers would like to consdier themself the most articulate athiests or noreligionist what ever you want to consdier yourself {Dixon Carter Lee, Thumper would be good considerations} their partner in the fun would be whomever would consider themselves the most articulate religion based person who can defend the rights of religion in general articulately {Texan, Tall Shy Guy would be good for this group}

This sthought experiment will be called humanism versus deism or vice versa.

What will take place will be very simple each group will consist of 8 post 4 from each side.

1st post would be the opening arguement or presentation of the subject I present.

2nd post would be the body or debate

3rd post would be a rebuttal to the others body or debate

4th post would be conclusion or closing statements

After all is said and done the body of Literotica can discuss who did the better job of presenting thier side of the issue.

The thought experiment comes into play by this factor:

You will not be defending your position on the topic you will be defending the opposite view on the topic.

example

if i gave the subject of horse racing and it is between a horse race admirer and a horse race objector., it would look something like this.

Horse race admirer has to defend why horse race should be keep off television
Horse race objector has to defend why horse racing should be put on television.

Do you think you are ready for the Thought Experiment?

I think this would be a highly entertaining and educational challenge for everyone viewing as well as those participating

 

[Guest]

Todd, this is a SEX site....

So, how about
"hores fucker has to defend why horses should be blown"
VS
"horse blower has to defend why houses should be fucked"

There we go!!

Wait, this should go in the Personals section.....

 

[Dixon Carter Lee]

I'm inellegible to play. I've already won this game 76 times.

 

[Guest]

I'm inellegible to play. I've already won this game 76 times.

So did the horses get fucked or blown??

 

[Todd-'o'-Vision]

I'm inellegible to play. I've already won this game 76 times.

yes your elegible to play, you haven't played it this way in my 2 1/2 years here

you have only played your normal games

 

[Mischka]

Brain fried - just finished a final that kicked my ass from here to Tibet. Plus I'm downright moderate next to that group o' liberals.

 

[Svedish_Chef]

You need 4 people for one thought?

This DOES sound like politics.

 

[Dixon Carter Lee]

Wrong. I've debated and debated and debated you, and you still slavishly hang onto Creationist pap and conspiratorial nonsense. I gave up "debating" with you, or taking you seriously, when you announced your belief that dinosaurs and humans walked the earth together. You're bright, but you've shown an amazing ineptitude for critical analysis. There's no point in taking your "thought experiment", because it's just anothe shoddily constructed enterprise to fit the square peg of lazy thought into the round hole of reason.

 

[jass1960]

I would like to have:

2 people for Group A:

Group A would consist of Whomever would like to consider themself the most articulate Democrat or leftist or liberal which everyou want to call yourself {Lavender, Thumper, Weevil Mishcka would be good canadates} just one who ever consideres themselves up for the fun. Thier partner in this thought experiement would be the most articulate right winger, conservatice, libertarian, republican {Uncle Bill, Cheyenne, Miles, Ismael would be good canadates} just one whoever considers themselves up for it.

This thought experiment will be called Right versus Left or vice Versa

2 people for Group B:

Group B would consist of whomever considers would like to consdier themself the most articulate athiests or noreligionist what ever you want to consdier yourself {Dixon Carter Lee, Thumper would be good considerations} their partner in the fun would be whomever would consider themselves the most articulate religion based person who can defend the rights of religion in general articulately {Texan, Tall Shy Guy would be good for this group}

This sthought experiment will be called humanism versus deism or vice versa.

What will take place will be very simple each group will consist of 8 post 4 from each side.

1st post would be the opening arguement or presentation of the subject I present.

2nd post would be the body or debate

3rd post would be a rebuttal to the others body or debate

4th post would be conclusion or closing statements

After all is said and done the body of Literotica can discuss who did the better job of presenting thier side of the issue.

The thought experiment comes into play by this factor:

You will not be defending your position on the topic you will be defending the opposite view on the topic.

example

if i gave the subject of horse racing and it is between a horse race admirer and a horse race objector., it would look something like this.

Horse race admirer has to defend why horse race should be keep off television
Horse race objector has to defend why horse racing should be put on television.

Do you think you are ready for the Thought Experiment?

I think this would be a highly entertaining and educational challenge for everyone viewing as well as those participating

Looks like you have already chosen the players ...have fun!

 

[Todd-'o'-Vision]

Re: Re: I need 4 or more people for a thought experiement.

Looks like you have already chosen the players ...have fun!

Nope noone is picked i just named a few names that would be good canadates

if you want throw your name into the play

 

[Guest]

Wrong. I've debated and debated and debated you, and you still slavishly hang onto Creationist pap and conspiratorial nonsense. I gave up "debating" with you, or taking you seriously, when you announced your belief that dinosaurs and humans walked the earth together. You're bright, but you've shown an amazing ineptitude for critical analysis. There's no point in taking your "thought experiment", because it's just anothe shoddily constructed enterprise to fit the square peg of lazy thought into the round hole of reason.

ERGO, the hores gets fucked AND blown lucky horse.....

 

[Todd-'o'-Vision]

Wrong. I've debated and debated and debated you, and you still slavishly hang onto Creationist pap and conspiratorial nonsense. I gave up "debating" with you, or taking you seriously, when you announced your belief that dinosaurs and humans walked the earth together. You're bright, but you've shown an amazing ineptitude for critical analysis. There's no point in taking your "thought experiment", because it's just anothe shoddily constructed enterprise to fit the square peg of lazy thought into the round hole of reason.

see you still have the concept wrong about the thought experiment

this time you wouldn't be debating me and even if you were, in this thought experiment you would have to defend creationism while I defended your view

 

[Dixon Carter Lee]

Actually, it's interesting, Todd. But I know where it's going. You will pull three or four facts from the event and skew them to fit a pre-arranged hypothesis you've already settled on about faith, science and the American Way.

You can't have an "experiment" if your point of view, conclusion, and research paper are already drawn up.

 

[jass1960]

Re: Re: Re: I need 4 or more people for a thought experiement.

Nope noone is picked i just named a few names that would be good canadates

if you want throw your name into the play

Can I go in group C?

The middle ground - voice of reason?

 

[Todd-'o'-Vision]

Actually, it's interesting, Todd. But I know where it's going. You will pull three or four facts from the event and skew them to fit a pre-arranged hypothesis you've already settled on about faith, science and the American Way.

You can't have an "experiment" if your point of view, conclusion, and research paper are already drawn up.

Actually all I want to do is sit back watch and not say a thing wonce it starts.

This was something that my theology professor did in my senior year of college. He grouped us into different denominations and made us ardently defend whatever denomination he placed us in, on the bad side if we didn't put effort in, ie we didn't like the denom and wanted it to lose, we got bad marks as opposed to putting effort in to defend yet still losing to a better presentation.

and for the atiest vs reliogionist group the question wasn't going to be about faith or science so there

 

[Dixon Carter Lee]

Fair enough. I hereby excise my crabby self from this enterprise and encourage the other kids to play. Sounds interesting. Have at it.

 

[Todd-'o'-Vision]

Fair enough. I hereby excise my crabby self from this enterprise and encourage the other kids to play. Sounds interesting. Have at it.

I am hoping it will be interesting, in the class there were some really cool presenations.

I got stuck defending Early Mormonism which consisted of defending early polygamy doctrine. i actually managed to haul off with a b-

 

[Todd-'o'-Vision]

well I thought it would be a fun idea and game to play

 

[TN_Vixen]

Wrong. I've debated and debated and debated you, and you still slavishly hang onto Creationist pap and conspiratorial nonsense. I gave up "debating" with you, or taking you seriously, when you announced your belief that dinosaurs and humans walked the earth together. You're bright, but you've shown an amazing ineptitude for critical analysis. There's no point in taking your "thought experiment", because it's just anothe shoddily constructed enterprise to fit the square peg of lazy thought into the round hole of reason.

*chuckling*

 

[Todd-'o'-Vision]

You need 4 people for one thought?

This DOES sound like politics.

sorry it was meant to be fun

 

[Todd-'o'-Vision]

bump for maybe a more willing audience participation

 

[Todd-'o'-Vision]

Re: Re: Re: Re: I need 4 or more people for a thought experiement.

Can I go in group C?

The middle ground - voice of reason?

actually for the thought ecperiment the people need to be polar opposites

 

[Todd-'o'-Vision]

thats a shame that no one wants to play, cause its really fun, maybe todays crew will