i finally talked my GF into taking some nude pics... but.....

[mississippiGuy]

she said "your not gonna put these on the computer are u?" well i was like.. duhhh it's a digital camera.. so who wants to see more of amy? if you want to see her first pics look at the amature pic section on Literotica and it's under amyposes and amyposes2

 

[Problem Child]

Nice guy. Ever heard of Lorena Bobbit?

 

[mississippiGuy]

she knows i'm going to but... maybe i'll get her un-wayvering permission...

 

[Phoenyx]

she knows i'm going to but... maybe i'll get her un-wayvering permission...

you probably should. Doing stuff liek that withou her permission could land you in a whole bunch of legal trouble.

 

[mississippiGuy]

i know she doesnt care... and she'll probably be on here tonight looking for them.. but i'll be sure to ask anyway... u see the reason she didnt want these on here is because she SHAVED!!! completly BALD it looks very good, even though it didnt look bad when in full bush..

 

[Rubyfruit]

[B...it looks very good, even though it didnt look bad when in full bush.. [/B]

Speaking as a girl who happens to love pussy, I don't mind bush at all. In fact, I favor bush over stubble.

My favorite fantasy cunt though is shaved on the outer labia and right above the clit. The rest clipped short.

Perfect for dining.

Ruby

 

[KillerMuffin]

Well aren't you just the jerk of the week.

If my guy took naked pictures of me and posted them on the 'Net without asking me first, no matter how cool it may have been with me, I'd consider that a majorly serious breach of trust. Rationalizing that it's okay and that she won't have a problem with it doesn't mitigate the fact that you took something that belong solely to her, her naked body, and posted it for all and sundry to look at, jack off to, and judge without asking her opinion on the matter. You turned her into something resembling a free whore without her permission. If she likes the idea and wants it, then that's fabulous, post away. But you never know her true feelings on the matter without asking her. The statement "You're not going to put that on the computer are you?" sounds to me like she's not kosher with the whole idea and had some reservations. Bullying her into something by presenting it as fait accompli is underhanded and abusive. It shows a complete lack of trustworthiness, respect, loyalty, and love for someone you profess to adore. You violated her body and you violated her trust in you.

If I had a man like you, thank all that may or may not be sacred that I don't, we'd disappear into the woods and a few weeks later only one would come out. It wouldn't be you.

 

[Phoenyx]

Well aren't you just the jerk of the week.

If my guy took naked pictures of me and posted them on the 'Net without asking me first, no matter how cool it may have been with me, I'd consider that a majorly serious breach of trust. Rationalizing that it's okay and that she won't have a problem with it doesn't mitigate the fact that you took something that belong solely to her, her naked body, and posted it for all and sundry to look at, jack off to, and judge without asking her opinion on the matter. You turned her into something resembling a free whore without her permission. If she likes the idea and wants it, then that's fabulous, post away. But you never know her true feelings on the matter without asking her. The statement "You're not going to put that on the computer are you?" sounds to me like she's not kosher with the whole idea and had some reservations. Bullying her into something by presenting it as fait accompli is underhanded and abusive. It shows a complete lack of trustworthiness, respect, loyalty, and love for someone you profess to adore. You violated her body and you violated her trust in you.

If I had a man like you, thank all that may or may not be sacred that I don't, we'd disappear into the woods and a few weeks later only one would come out. It wouldn't be you.

Uh yeah what she said.

 

[Renegade]

KillerMuffin

You go, girlfriend!! *does finger snap and head twirl thing*

 

[YogiBare]

Muffin

I keep liking you more and more.

 

[morninggirl5]

i know she doesnt care... and she'll probably be on here tonight looking for them.. but i'll be sure to ask anyway... u see the reason she didnt want these on here is because she SHAVED!!! completly BALD it looks very good, even though it didnt look bad when in full bush..

I agree that she'll probably be looking for them. I suspect her reaction won't be very positive when she finds them. Asking if you were putting them on the computer means she was concerned that you were going to share them with others. Posting them on a public internet site is the height of "sharing."

As KM said, you'll be lucky if you survive her wrath.

 

[Phoenyx]

I wanna see what he looks like after she finds out he posted the pics.

 

[notenufsx4me]

Mister, you have balls. for now.

 

[Guest]

 

[ChaoticLil]

Correct me if i'm wrong....

But in order to post/publish pictures don't you need the subject's permission?

And wouldn't this non-consent cause problems with Laurel and Manu since he posted it on this site?

i'm just curious.....

 

[freakygirl]

she said "your not gonna put these on the computer are u?" well i was like.. duhhh it's a digital camera.. so who wants to see more of amy? if you want to see her first pics look at the amature pic section on Literotica and it's under amyposes and amyposes2

This guy is such an ass.. NOT for posting his girlfriends pictures.. because that isn't true..

amy's pic has been in that section for MONTHs possibly longer. (my husband was looking at them a few months ago and commented on the woman).. this dude just showed up on the board like 3 days ago.

It says right on the Amateur Pics page "Hello all! This section is temporarily on hold. We will resume updates once we work out some technical issues. Thanks for your patience, and take care!"

We can ask Laural if it's been updated in the last couple of days.. but I don't believe it has been.. As Laural would have removed the above statement off the page.

 

[T.H. Oughts]

Well aren't you just the jerk of the week.

And every thing else Killer Mufin said !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[Shy Tall Guy]

As KM said, you'll be lucky if you survive her wrath.

Or not lucky depending on how you think about it; think severed cock, think flaming bed, think ice pick in the ass - then think again about posting any picture of anybody without their express permission.

Saying it is a digicam and therefore "duh, yeah it's going on the 'net" is an rationalization of rude behavior. I take a lot of pics with my digicam and most of those containing people will not be posted period. I have posted pics of people - but they were covered under "fair use"; people feeding birds in the zoo, etc. - not intimate pics of a girlfriend. That is not a way good way to earn someone's trust.

While we all appreciate amateur erotic pics - I think most people here do not want them if they are posted without explicit happily given permission.

 

[Guru]

 

[LadyDarkFire]

Re: Correct me if i'm wrong....

But in order to post/publish pictures don't you need the subject's permission?

And wouldn't this non-consent cause problems with Laurel and Manu since he posted it on this site?

i'm just curious.....

Legally, there is ALOT to get in trouble with. First off, it is an invasion of her privacy, no matter if she consented to him taking the pictures in the first place or not. B. Yes, he could get in trouble with Laurel and Manu, because they might face a lawsuit. C. There is always the fact that Freakygurl brought up, and the possibility of getting sued by the original artist.

 

[KillerMuffin]

Legally the pictures belong to the copyright holder which is the person who took the pictures. The subject hasn't much say in what happens to them. However, if I remember correctly, there must be a consent to release form for pictures that fall under the umbrella of pornography. It also contains a little blurb that the model swears that s/he is over 18 years of age in the US. I'm not real sure on this one.

Take your family portrait down to any picture place besides the place that took the shots and try to get them copied. They'll turn you away because you're infringing on the copyright holder, the person or portrait studio where it was done.

Legally, they can be posted, I believe. Morally, if I were the guy who did it without consent, I'd never go to sleep again.

 

[modest mouse]

Maybe I am being too cynical but.....

It strikes me that both "unregistered" and MississippiGuy may be just stirring things up. If you in fact wanted to put pics up of someone without their knowledge, you can easily stick 'em up under the guise of the person or as the husband with a willing partner.

Why cast suspicion on yourself for no reason. I'm not saying posting pictures online without permission is right, just that it is pervasive and difficult to enforce.

Of course, maybe these two posters are not particularly bright and opened their yaps.

 

[cyndiesweet]

mm

I agree he is looking for attention.

 

[Shy Tall Guy]

mm

I agree he is looking for attention.

I am not sure about that - I do think it is possible that he is trying to stir some shit, which I don't really mind as long as it is interesting and makes people think.

 

[fgarvb1]

I think he should change his name to mississippijackass.

or maybe mississippijackasskr1.