I bet men on this thread
- Thread starter Vman55
- Start date
LupusDei
curious alien
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2017
- Posts
- 4,255
That's quite brave claim to make; your only hope of success is ignorance.
Until you successfully gather 1000 men posts first -- what I don't see happening -- the very first undoubted woman who post would invalidate your claim. Well, with one you might still say, that's only for now, let's see if it was the only ever. Well, let's make the failure mark at two, there hardly even theoretical chance to recover from that.
Btw, don't worry: it's 100% men by now.
Until you successfully gather 1000 men posts first -- what I don't see happening -- the very first undoubted woman who post would invalidate your claim. Well, with one you might still say, that's only for now, let's see if it was the only ever. Well, let's make the failure mark at two, there hardly even theoretical chance to recover from that.
Btw, don't worry: it's 100% men by now.
Lol. I have had conversations with several on here. The point I am making is that look at each thread and look at the responses.
LupusDei
curious alien
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2017
- Posts
- 4,255
Hmm, I see you probably should be a bit more accurate with terms: I had this very thread in mind, just the scope of responses to your post.
If you mean the personals section or the whole forums in the entirety instead (as I now think you did), you might be on to something a bit harder to disprove. Although I would doubt the rating is indeed that bad. Then how large the practical difference between say, 873:1 and 1002:1 is? Not that much.
If I made counter claim that the true ratio is less than 256:1 what could be the possible course of action to prove or disprove it?
Actually I could not prove or disprove. I just made a broad guess of what I have observed over the past few months.
