i am sore

[bg23]

and not because of what you think!

pity me.

 

[Sulk]

and not because of what you think!

pity me.

{{{bg23}}}! Sending sympathy and emotional emollient!

 

[bg23]

thanks.

my arm is bruised and owie.

*sniffle*

 

[wolfie69]

and not because of what you think!

pity me.

and why, pray tell, should we pity you?

 

[rcuhljr]

Well

and not because of what you think!

We could change that

 

[bg23]

and why, pray tell, should we pity you?

because i'm bg
and pitiable

have you no heart?

 

[bg23]

We could change that

but what the devil for?

 

[rcuhljr]

but what the devil for?

It makes for a much more entertaining story then.

 

[bg23]

It makes for a much more entertaining story then.

would you argue, then, that content is all that matters?

 

[rcuhljr]

would you argue, then, that content is all that matters?

I'm definently a function over form kinda guy.

 

[bg23]

I'm definently a function over form kinda guy.

ah...i had hoped you might be more discerning

i am more interested in style than content.

 

[rcuhljr]

ah...i had hoped you might be more discerning

i am more interested in style than content.

It jsut always seemed to me like style was fun at first, but contents whats going to matter after that . Style has it's place and function.

*Edit all your spelling are not belong to me edit*

 

[bg23]

*shrugs*

function without style
is function without value

put it this way -

any guy can fuck a girl...
but the ones who can do it with style, will be the ones who get to do it again.

 

[rcuhljr]

any guy can fuck a girl...
but the ones who can do it with style, will be the ones who get to do it again.

Perhaps we have different definitions, I consider style looking good while you fuck a girl, substance is bringing her the best orgasm she's had. I know which one I aim for and I think I know which one will get me invited back

 

[bg23]

that's appearance.

style and appearance are different, though of course appearance with style is something that is pleasant.

 

[rcuhljr]

Well thats enough semantics for today.

 

[bg23]

Enough?
Semantics?
NEVER!

 

[rcuhljr]

must break 30 posts... I mean... I love semantics!

 

[Niiteshade]

Semantics?

"Semantics" would be answering this post. But since I'm here.......

i am sore

and not because of what you think

pity me

Sorry.

Cute Pic, but I pity no one. Ever.


-Niiteshade

 

[bg23]

you just wanna lose your virginity
slut.

 

[bg23]

Sorry.

Cute Pic, but I pity no one. Ever.


-Niiteshade

thank you for posting merely to tell me that.
very insightful and informative.

 

[rcuhljr]

you just wanna lose your virginity
slut.

Me?
*searches around for the proper face*
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v610/rcuhljr/3some.gif

 

[muddpuppy]

I am sore too... And its exactly what you think.

 

[rcuhljr]

I am sore too... And its exactly what you think.

Badminton?

 

[Niiteshade]

bg23 pens this insightful response.........with 21,000+ posts:

thank you for posting merely to tell me that.

very insightful and informative.

Well. I have come to one conclusion here. You have too much time
on your hands to ask a stupid question like the one you querried us with here.

Time better spent?


-Niiteshade