Hussein Successor Already Chosen

Lost Cause

It's a wrap!
Joined
Oct 7, 2001
Posts
30,949
Does this look like a done deal, and we're rolling into Baghdad no later than March?
Is this successor going to be another Shah, or does his politics make him more of a populist?
Does it mean anything that he already has ties to Iran?
Do you think Hussein and his political thugs will be brought to trial?


The United States has chosen a successor to Saddam Hussein from Iraq's notoriously fractious opposition groups, according to a former Iraqi diplomat who lives in Sydney.

Mohamed al-Jabiri, who has just returned from in talks with Washington, said the White House has given its "blessing" to the head of the Iraqi National Congress, Ahmed Chalabi, to lead a transitional coalition government in Iraq once Saddam has been deposed.

Dr al-Jabiri, who talked to Mr Chalabi over the phone last month, said: "He told me that he would take over. He has the blessing of the White House and the State Department."

He said Mr Chalabi had been in talks with another major Iraqi opposition group, the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq and the Iranian Government while in Tehran.

Mr Chalabi moved to Sala-huddin in Kurdish-controlled northern Iraq last week, ahead of an expected United States-led invasion. Opposition forces will hold a summit in northern Iraq on February 15.

Mr Chalabi, who is a progressive liberal, is far from universally popular among Iraqi exiles. However, successful talks in Tehran, and Iranian assistance in getting him into Iraq, shows he has galvanised considerable support from the Iraqi opposition.

Analysts believe disunity in the Iraqi opposition would make it near impossible to form a transitional government from its ranks, leading to speculation that the US will have to effectively occupy Iraq for a year or longer to maintain order.

Dr al-Jabiri said the US was keen to avoid such a situation, aware that it would create resentment among the Iraqi people and in the Middle East.

Mr Chalabi, the 58-year old scion of an Iraqi financial dynasty, left Iraq aged 11, spending most of his exile in Britain and the US, where he studied mathematics. In 1996 he led an unsuccessful uprising against Saddam that resulted in hundreds of deaths. A sentence of 22 years hard labour hangs over him in Jordan where he was convicted in his absence in 1992 of fraud.

Dr al-Jabiri, who spent two years in solitary confinement before escaping to the US and then Australia, has been working with the US State Department and Iraqi exiles to draw up a political blueprint for Iraq after Saddam, developing plans for health, education, the media and judiciary.

He said a new government would be in place three months after Saddam's removal and elections for a national parliament after one year.

The aim is to have a new constitution that would adopt a federal structure to ease power-sharing among Iraq's different religious and ethnic groups.

Most Iraqis are Shi'ite Muslims but there is a substantial Kurdish community to the north. Sunni Muslims, Christians, Assyrians and Turks also make up the country's 22 million population.

"We all agreed that a federation must be established," Dr al-Jabiri said.

"We have drafted over 1000 pages of new rules and regulations. It's really quite a work. It's very impressive."

A meeting in Washington on March 7 is scheduled to formally adopt the plan.

Dr al-Jabiri has been most involved in the "transitional justice working group", which is examining ways to prosecute Saddam and leading figures in the Iraqi regime.

He said that they would be prosecuted in Iraqi courts, not in the International Court of Justice in the Hague. "We don't want to give Saddam the chance like [former Yugoslav leader Slobodan] Milosevic to use it for propaganda," he said.

International jurists and the media would be invited to attend, he said.


:D
 
Yeah but how good is Al Jabari at cricket - would he command his place if he want the captain??

I say keep Hussain till after the world cup at least and then see

Whatn happens if England win - and what the fuck has it got to do with washington
 
Gord said:
Yeah but how good is Al Jabari at cricket - would he command his place if he wasnt the captain??

I say keep Hussain till after the world cup at least and then see

What happens if England win - and what the fuck has it got to do with washington
 
n/a

And what will be left to administrate?

Yes the Jordan rumour is true. Iraqi's will be moving to live in Jordan as Iraq will no longer exist.

The day the US invades is the day Saddam uses everything at his disposal and the US gets to use it's favourite toy.

It's been a long time since Hiroshima
 
Hitler had the largest stockpile...

Of chemical weapons in the world at the start of WW2, but never used them for fear the allies would retailate in kind. Even a madman knows there is no chance of power in rubble. The military command is working every conceivable threat through. Remember, the allies in Western Europe practiced for 50 years for a chem/bio/nuke war against the Warsaw pact, Iraq will be another 7 day practice.
If he goes nuclear, so will we. He'll have the reputation of being the last leader of the last Iraqi nation.
 
n/a

Hitler was in control of other countries. In his mind he was winning a war.

Saddam is in control of his own country. He is being told to disarm or face the consequences. He is aware that the US is hell bent on removing him from power. He is being backed into a corner with no way out other than exile. He is aware the US want to come into his country, take over and profit from the oil there.

He will use everything in his power he has left.

According to the US. He has weapons of mass destruction and has already used them against the Kurds and Iran.

Surely he won't have a problem using them against a country coming into his country to kill him and take control of his country?

Or did the US just use the chemical weapons use as another propaganda ploy to get support for the last war and disarming him?
 
So if he used chem/bio/nuke weapons...

Then we were correct. In NATO, we trained to operate in any of those environments, so he may kill a lot of his fellow subjects, but our soldiers will prevail. The world will judge and condemn him forever.
It's totally his call, he can right now present the weapon locations, let us remove and destroy them, diffuse the war, and get the sanctions lifted. He can then start his programs back up without any intrusion from the US/UN. He stays in power, and were back to pre-1988 Iraq.
 
Back
Top