Hurricane cost N.O. NFL Franchise?

XXIII

Damn you and such
Joined
May 28, 2005
Posts
4,724
Saints owner Tom Benson declared this week that nothing will be decided on the franchise's future until after the season. But ESPN's Chris Mortensen reports that, based on information from key league sources, the team has probably played its last game in New Orleans.

According to Mortensen, San Antonio is a likely home for 2006 and Los Angeles is the preferred destination beyond that. The NFL could still include New Orleans as a Super Bowl site when the city is reconstructed, and expansion might even be a possibility, but that's 10 to 15 years away.

If the Saints relocate to San Antonio or elsewhere, New Orleans has only a slim chance of ever seeing another NFL team, according to a major sports consultant.

Marc Ganis of SportsCorp Ltd. in Chicago served as a consultant to Cleveland in 1996 when that city's NFL team moved to Baltimore and the NFL guaranteed Cleveland a new team and allowed the city to keep the Browns' logos, colors and nickname.

Earlier this week, New Orleans mayor Ray Nagin said he wanted the "Cleveland deal" if the team relocates. Gov. Kathleen Blanco said she supported Nagin on such a plan.

But Ganis questioned the strategy.

"If I were advising Mayor Nagin, I would have given him the same advice that someone should have given the mayors of Baltimore and Houston," Ganis said. "Hold on to what you have. Do everything you have to hold on to what you've got, because there's no certainty to what will come next or what will come at all."

Houston lost the Oilers to Tennessee and later got the expansion Texans.

Ganis said New Orleans is already viewed as a small market struggling to remain financially competitive -- and most NFL owners oppose expanding beyond the present 32 teams.

Cleveland provided stout support for its new team with corporate dollars and businesses that generated tax money to build a new stadium, Ganis said.

"It's not the people," Ganis said of New Orleans' situation. "It's not the individuals who show up at the game and buy the tickets. The people are great. It's the business, or lack of, that's the primary factor. For whatever reason, the area simply does not have many strong and large businesses."

But Ganis and two other sports consultants said the issue includes a wild card -- compassion for a city devastated by Hurricane Katrina.

"When it's all said and done, the whole situation boils down to one thing -- how do these 32 owners feel about resolving New Orleans while protecting their franchise value?" said David Carter, a sports consultant in Los Angeles.

Dean Bonham, a sports consultant based in Denver, questioned whether the NFL would support a move to San Antonio, which like New Orleans is considered a small market, or whether the NFL could strike a deal to build or renovate a stadium equipped for a team in Los Angeles.

If neither San Antonio nor Los Angeles is adequately prepared to support an NFL team, Bonham said the Saints will likely remain in New Orleans.

"I would have to say the chances are 50-50 or less that you'll see the New Orleans Saints move from one city to another at this point," Bonham said.

Information from The Associated Press was used in this report.
 
The crappy dome they have now and the small market and low income fan base of NO is going to cost NO it's team.

They were leaving anyways.
 
I would love to see a team in L.A. but not that way and not necessarily the Saints...

Edit: if they do come, do we have to change their name to something inane like the Los Angeles Saints of New Orleans?

Personally a L.A. Team should be named The Fatitas...
 
Last edited:
If they really are moving because of reconstruction moving to LA would be stupid, because eventally they will have to deal with earthquake damage. That's a given. Texas seems the better choice.
 
We in the Uk will never understand the Yank's predilection for moving teams round the country. OK, your stadium gets flooded, bombed, burnt down. But you go back. It's your home. :confused:
 
The whole history of our country is about movement, so why should it be surprizing? Even the Natives didn't stay in one spot much before the Europeans came.
 
Yeah but that was to follow the food. Not because a Hurricane came in and destroyed your crap and then it let the waters free to flood them out.

Nah if they moved to LA there is no way they can call them the Saints ;)

L.A. Anti-Christs
 
Ok, hate to nit pick, but...wouldn't a hurriacane coming in and destroying your crap include your food? ;)
 
XXIII said:
Yeah but that was to follow the food. Not because a Hurricane came in and destroyed your crap and then it let the waters free to flood them out.

Nah if they moved to LA there is no way they can call them the Saints ;)

L.A. Anti-Christs

It would still be better than "Utah Jazz".

Even leaving aside the fact that the Saints' owner was bitching about the alleged inadequacy of the Superdome before it became the world's largest floating morgue, you need a certain sized local economy to support a NFL franchise and it's by no means clear that New Orleans is ever going to have such an economy again.

I can't see the team going back to New Orleans unless the league subsidizes it in the short run; and NFL owners aren't known for their sentimentality, as we Browns fans found out 10 years ago this week.
 
Hey I say they can move them but give them the same deal they gave Cleveland.
 
sweet soft kiss said:
I would love to see a team in L.A. but not that way and not necessarily the Saints...

Edit: if they do come, do we have to change their name to something inane like the Los Angeles Saints of New Orleans?

Personally a L.A. Team should be named The Fatitas...

lol
something about that just sounds wrong
 
Back
Top