Howard Dean says "hate speech" isn't covered by the First Amendment

[water505]

Another attempt to silence conservatives...what a douche.

 

[Tristyn]

Another attempt to silence conservatives...what a douche.

Are you suggesting that by silencing conservatives, hate speech will be a thing of the past?

 

[water505]

Are you suggesting that by silencing conservatives, hate speech will be a thing of the past?

You never get tired of embarrassing yourself.

 

[Tristyn]

You never get tired of embarrassing yourself.

Trying to cover your tracks, Miles?

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Another attempt to silence conservatives...what a douche.

He can't define it, but he knows it when he sees it...

 

[SyKoKo]

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/hkXQzZVNTwA/maxresdefault.jpg

Are you suggesting that by silencing conservatives, hate speech will be a thing of the past?

 

[Tristyn]

My three favorite fellas from the BroPatrol - AJ, Miles & BusyBody.

I feel so loved.

 

[Parminderjeet]

Another attempt to silence conservatives...what a douche.

Admitting your side is full of hate speech is the first step. Congrats!

 

[Rightguide]

Another attempt to silence conservatives...what a douche.

Hate speech is protected speech. This is Dean's attempt to classify as hate speech anything a conservative says that exceeds the rigid limits of their PC guidelines.

 

[Rightguide]

My three favorite fellas from the BroPatrol - AJ, Miles & BusyBody.

I feel so loved.

Let's face it, you do have three major accommodating orifices.

Just kidding.

 

[SyKoKo]

Hate speech is protected speech. This is Dean's attempt to classify as hate speech anything a conservative says that exceeds the rigid limits of their PC guidelines.

I agree

HATE speech shpud be cut off

This way, we never have to hear from DUMZ n LIBZ

 

[OralDave]

Another attempt to silence conservatives...what a douche.

Not everyone left of center opposes free speech.

 

[Tristyn]

Hate speech is protected speech. This is Dean's attempt to classify as hate speech anything a conservative says that exceeds the rigid limits of their PC guidelines.

Rigid limits of their PC guidelines?

Liberalism is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality. Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but generally they support ideas and programmes such as freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom of religion, free markets, civil rights, democratic societies, secular governments, gender equality, and international cooperation.

Liberalism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism

 

[SyKoKo]

https://i0.wp.com/liberalsarenuts.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/cropped-Libs-Are-Nuts-Logo.png?fit=248%2C215

 

[Rightguide]

Rigid limits of their PC guidelines?



Liberalism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism

Ask Milo Yiannopoulos, David Horowitz, and Ann Coulter to explain it to you.

 

[Rightguide]

Liberalism
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberalism

Today's liberal tolerates no thought outside of their own. This is why you never hear a real conservative viewpoint on the MSM without editorial ridicule or condemnation.

 

[Disgustipated]

Let's face it, you do have three major accommodating orifices.

Just kidding.

Today's liberal tolerates no thought outside of their own. This is why you never hear a real conservative viewpoint on the MSM without editorial ridicule or condemnation.

Yeah, totally not vettebigot.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

That is the classic definition.

The Left tried to run as Socialists and were not successful.

FDR redefined the meaning of Liberalism in a speech advocating Socialist principles
but put into terms that the American voters related too, but which had new, hidden
meanings. In the same speech he identified former liberals as conservatives.

Once the public saw this new Liberalism in action and heard it in speech, they
rejected it as completely as they did Socialism. Then they adopted the term
Progressive until the voting public caught on yet again, especially with FDR.

Currently thanks to the efforts of the governmental-education complex, they use
a variety of labels to mislead the public including Liberal, Progressive and even
the term Social Democrat.

 

[Tristyn]

Ask Milo Yiannopoulos, David Horowitz, and Ann Coulter to explain it to you.

Explain what to me?

 

[Tristyn]

Today's liberal tolerates no thought outside of their own. This is why you never hear a real conservative viewpoint on the MSM without editorial ridicule or condemnation.

Real conservative viewpoint?

Such as?

 

[Rightguide]

Explain what to me?

The effective use and implementation of their "rigid limits of their PC guidelines," in the public arena.

 

[Rightguide]

Real conservative viewpoint?

Such as?

Such as those articulated by the people I mentioned being violently opposed on college campuses

 

[phrodeau]

The effective use and implementation of their "rigid limits of their PC guidelines," in the public arena.

Any one of those clowns can rent their own venue for their shows. If they get dis-invited to campuses or conventions, they have only themselves to blame.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

No, they have the intolerance and lack of inclusion in the University that practices the silencing of free speech as the sole blame.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

UC Berkeley is promising violence if Ann Coulter speaks there...



(And they're going to retreat into the safe zones.)