How to Make Love to Ghost

sirhugs

Riding to the Rescue
Joined
Jan 25, 2002
Posts
40,488
MCM (for Male) and MCF (female) are the last left awake (or not retreated to fuck in another room ) at the "spirit watch party" at the alleged haunted house.
He mans the sound boom. she is camera operator (even though there are several automtic camneras). Neither is convinced about ghosts, but it is a good gig. especially if this pilot soesnot debunk the question of "do ghosts exist?"

As midnight approaches, she muses "it would be a lot more fun if the question was "how do you fuck a ghost?"


He responds: "well, since thet don't exist, there is no answer."

Just thenn the spooky sound starts, and the wiind blow shut an interior door.

Is there a ghost present? do we find out how to fuck a ghost?

which Mc demonstrates?
Or do both?
Does gender of the ghost matter?

do the producers believe then in the morning?
what does the film show?
 
If the ghost is capable of telekinesis then the ghost definitely can fuck someone, but the opposite question is still undetermined.

The same is true for telepathy, only in different ways.

Telekinetic ghost may temporary materialize body or parts of it, or substitute. With telepathic ghost the whole encounter could be mental only.

The cameras will likely show the embodied participants apparently masturbate or engage with each other, possibly with uncertain additional shadows or at most unexplainable movements of objects, but nothing conclusive. If they don't stop working at all, that is.
 
If the ghost is capable of telekinesis then the ghost definitely can fuck someone, but the opposite question is still undetermined.

The same is true for telepathy, only in different ways.

Telekinetic ghost may temporary materialize body or parts of it, or substitute. With telepathic ghost the whole encounter could be mental only.

The cameras will likely show the embodied participants apparently masturbate or engage with each other, possibly with uncertain additional shadows or at most unexplainable movements of objects, but nothing conclusive. If they don't stop working at all, that is.
Isn't this all theoretical, however? When and where were the cameras used that show this?
 
Isn't this all theoretical, however? When and where were the cameras used that show this?
Lol, of course theoretical. Until I become a ghost myself I'm not very inclined to believe their existence, although wouldn't rule it out.
 
and what about angels?
Well, you're not going to see any of those until after you pass. And that's assuming you have no mortal sins on your soul.

When I was learning Catholic doctrine at weekly "religious instruction" - I was a public school student the rest of the time - the nuns told us that everybody had a guardian angel assigned to be with them. Of course one could never see this entity. Like a lot of religious concepts, it was both very specific yet vague too. We never could ask this, but did non-Catholics have these angels too? The nuns of 1963-65 were not theologians, thus I doubt they could have answered that. But believe me, as a kid, such queries would not have been appreciated by those old school nuns.
 
I imagine that a ghost can "possess" a living human, and can have sex while in possession. The host may or may not be aware of what's going on at the time (at the discretion of the author). The living partner might or might not be aware that they were having sex with a ghost (depending on the demands of the plot).

And of course everyone knows that ghosts can "slime" you, so there is no worry about lubrication.

Angels can take on any number of forms if they need to interact with humans. A pillar of fire, a sorority girl, a winged giant, a certified public accountant; whatever they need at the time. They have a rigid hierarchy of organization, with the most powerful ones being fewer and higher up, and the lower levels ones being more numerous but of lesser powers.
 
Lol, of course theoretical. Until I become a ghost myself I'm not very inclined to believe their existence, although wouldn't rule it out.
I know someone who claims to have seen a ghost, or what she took to be a ghost, one night in a house in Massachusetts. Apparently it could push a door open, so it had some impact on the physical world. It looked like the stereotypical "Casper" or Halloween ghost, a white shape of about human size with dark eye holes.

I hope I don't become a ghost myself, if that is even possible. I don't know what happens to us after death, but I would prefer to just "blink out," cease to exist. Maybe the universe has other plans for us.
 
I imagine that a ghost can "possess" a living human, and can have sex while in possession. The host may or may not be aware of what's going on at the time (at the discretion of the author). The living partner might or might not be aware that they were having sex with a ghost (depending on the demands of the plot).

And of course everyone knows that ghosts can "slime" you, so there is no worry about lubrication.

Angels can take on any number of forms if they need to interact with humans. A pillar of fire, a sorority girl, a winged giant, a certified public accountant; whatever they need at the time. They have a rigid hierarchy of organization, with the most powerful ones being fewer and higher up, and the lower levels ones being more numerous but of lesser powers.
Wasn't the idea of "sliming" invented by the writers of the original Ghostbusters, or did it exist before that?
 
I know someone who claims to have seen a ghost, or what she took to be a ghost, one night in a house in Massachusetts. Apparently it could push a door open, so it had some impact on the physical world. It looked like the stereotypical "Casper" or Halloween ghost, a white shape of about human size with dark eye holes.

I hope I don't become a ghost myself, if that is even possible. I don't know what happens to us after death, but I would prefer to just "blink out," cease to exist. Maybe the universe has other plans for us.

I have had an encounter, recurring actually, with a ghost like phenomenon myself. It wasn't a Casper like though for sure, but a clump of slight darkness, a voluminous shadow in a size of a very large domestic cat, or slightly bigger perhaps. Hard to quantify. It's behavior was rather animal like too, perhaps indeed a ghost cat, perhaps been like that for a while.

The one time I believe to have seen it static it appeared to be sleeping curled up on a rug by the door. Although it's hard to have conclusions about something that has no form nor shape and almost perfectly transparent. Prior to that I perceived it as only unspecified fearful presence, the uncanny feeling of being watched.

Accepting it as body-less animal inhabiting that space was perhaps a rationalization of that fear, as in the result I lost it. It was rather jumpy itself, and tried to stay out of sight preferring high places -- like the hat shelf by said door, but it apparently didn't actually need much support if any, or at least navigated walls at will, leaping around unphysically and seemingly crossing, disappearing through at least one wall and possibly ceiling. I never attempted to interact with it.

And yes, I was a kid, and had to navigate said space often, a perpetually dark (even with lights on, somehow) long windowless corridor going from a door cut in the corner of a living room to a portion of dinning room divided off by a wall, to the inner hall with kitchen stairs entrance, and going counter clockwise from that, kitchen door, bathroom, toilet, master bedroom door in a niche formed by extended capital wall end, and children room door. We lived in main entrance hall, office and living room. The children room now connected to the dinning room (while the original double door to the living room was filled in) was another tenant space, and yet another lived in the master bedroom and also occupied the maid's room behind the kitchen.

It was built before the war as rather upscale two-bedroom apartment with over twelve feet high decorated ceilings, reportedly by the finance ministry. You didn't choose roommates in Soviet communal apartments, and there was certain tensions. Especially with the Russian lady living in the master bedroom. Her son was a career militarily, naval infantry I think, and his home stays were the worst.

But I digress. The point is, the communal space was degraded in multiple senses and nobody was comfortable to spend time in it. For a kid with... certain slight paranormal abilities... to invent a creature inhabiting it wouldn't be at all unexpected.
 
Last edited:
Well, you're not going to see any of those until after you pass. And that's assuming you have no mortal sins on your soul.

When I was learning Catholic doctrine at weekly "religious instruction" - I was a public school student the rest of the time - the nuns told us that everybody had a guardian angel assigned to be with them. Of course one could never see this entity. Like a lot of religious concepts, it was both very specific yet vague too. We never could ask this, but did non-Catholics have these angels too? The nuns of 1963-65 were not theologians, thus I doubt they could have answered that. But believe me, as a kid, such queries would not have been appreciated by those old school nuns.
IIRC George Bailey in Its a Wonderful Life saw Clarence (I know the audience did) . Would your nuns have whacked Frank Capra's knuckles with a ruler? After all, he was a good Italian biy who invented the cinema of the "American Dream". Per wikipedia:
"Capra wrote in his early adulthood that he was a "Christmas Catholic".

In his later years, Capra returned to the Catholic Church and described himself as "a Catholic in spirit; one who firmly believes that the anti-moral, the intellectual bigots, and the Mafias of ill will may destroy religion, but they will never conquer the cross".[68]"
 
IIRC George Bailey in Its a Wonderful Life saw Clarence (I know the audience did) . Would your nuns have whacked Frank Capra's knuckles with a ruler? After all, he was a good Italian biy who invented the cinema of the "American Dream". Per wikipedia:
"Capra wrote in his early adulthood that he was a "Christmas Catholic".

In his later years, Capra returned to the Catholic Church and described himself as "a Catholic in spirit; one who firmly believes that the anti-moral, the intellectual bigots, and the Mafias of ill will may destroy religion, but they will never conquer the cross".[68]"
Since we were actually public school students there for one afternoon per week, the nuns may have been easier on us than they were with their regular students. I remember one who did grab a kid by the ear - assuming my memory is accurate. I didn't see them whack anybody on the knuckles with a ruler. In any case, by the 1960s physical punishment of students in general was becoming less common - at least in the United States. It's technically still legal in some states, although I'm sure teachers are very wary of using it now. In earlier decades, probably not - but I haven't studied it in any detail.

Thanks for the details about Frank Capra; I didn't know much about him. Did he actually attend Catholic schools?
 
Since we were actually public school students there for one afternoon per week, the nuns may have been easier on us than they were with their regular students. I remember one who did grab a kid by the ear - assuming my memory is accurate. I didn't see them whack anybody on the knuckles with a ruler. In any case, by the 1960s physical punishment of students in general was becoming less common - at least in the United States. It's technically still legal in some states, although I'm sure teachers are very wary of using it now. In earlier decades, probably not - but I haven't studied it in any detail.

Thanks for the details about Frank Capra; I didn't know much about him. Did he actually attend Catholic schools?
He apparently was raised Catholic but I am not sure what that meant . He came to America at age 5. Was raised in "Italian gehetto" of LA- which does suggest catholic schools.

I attended public schools in Canada (Ontario) in the 60s. I recall in the younger grades teachers whacking kids' knuckles with the ruler, but that largely stopped before the decade ended - the Google machine supplements my fuzzy recolletion - Toronto banned it in 1972, other boards later . Province banned it only in 2004. But by 1967, the reformers had made it rare. I started high school in 1970 and at my school, there were lots of kids that would have punched any teacher that tried it.

But we digress. Ghosts might change everything. Ghostbusters certainly did.

Interesting no one has yet mentioned Ghost which was so influential a love story in its day.
 
He apparently was raised Catholic but I am not sure what that meant . He came to America at age 5. Was raised in "Italian gehetto" of LA- which does suggest catholic schools.

I attended public schools in Canada (Ontario) in the 60s. I recall in the younger grades teachers whacking kids' knuckles with the ruler, but that largely stopped before the decade ended - the Google machine supplements my fuzzy recolletion - Toronto banned it in 1972, other boards later . Province banned it only in 2004. But by 1967, the reformers had made it rare. I started high school in 1970 and at my school, there were lots of kids that would have punched any teacher that tried it.

But we digress. Ghosts might change everything. Ghostbusters certainly did.

Interesting no one has yet mentioned Ghost which was so influential a love story in its day.
Ghost could have been written by a Catholic, considering its emphasis on souls going to either Heaven or Hell immediately after death. (Although a few like Sam get stuck in the ghost mode for a while.) Purgatory doesn't seen to be an option. I looked it up, and it was written by a Jewish guy named Bruce Joel Rubin.

I don't know how the numerous Protestant sects view judgment in the afterlife. Apparently it varies a lot. Judaism has yet another view of it, although I'd have to check into exactly what it is. Anyway, I'm a lapsed Catholic, so I'm pretty clear on what they believe.
 
Ghost could have been written by a Catholic, considering its emphasis on souls going to either Heaven or Hell immediately after death. (Although a few like Sam get stuck in the ghost mode for a while.) Purgatory doesn't seen to be an option. I looked it up, and it was written by a Jewish guy named Bruce Joel Rubin.

I don't know how the numerous Protestant sects view judgment in the afterlife. Apparently it varies a lot. Judaism has yet another view of it, although I'd have to check into exactly what it is. Anyway, I'm a lapsed Catholic, so I'm pretty clear on what they believe.
so you see story potential here?
what sort of afterlife do plot bunnies have?
 
so you see story potential here?
what sort of afterlife do plot bunnies have?
Plot bunnies live or die with their creators, unless someone else picks up the idea. I don't think plot bunnies have afterlives!

I do have a series of stories on another site that involve a priest doubting his faith, including the concepts of how our souls are judged - or if they are judged at all. I doubt I could do it on Lit because of the issue of religion. A bigger problem is age restrictions. There is a scene in which a woman role plays as a girl of sixteen, and I'm sure that won't fly here.
 
Plot bunnies live or die with their creators, unless someone else picks up the idea. I don't think plot bunnies have afterlives!

I do have a series of stories on another site that involve a priest doubting his faith, including the concepts of how our souls are judged - or if they are judged at all. I doubt I could do it on Lit because of the issue of religion. A bigger problem is age restrictions. There is a scene in which a woman role plays as a girl of sixteen, and I'm sure that won't fly here.
we hope the most bouncy bunnies devrlop a life of their own.
 
I've had a few plots that did turn into stories, including three chapters of a series, that I never published. The stories just weren't working out. I still have the files if I ever want to get back to them. So they are not truly dead, but in limbo? (Possibly forever.)
 
Wasn't the idea of "sliming" invented by the writers of the original Ghostbusters, or did it exist before that?
The idea of ectoplasm far predates Ghostbusters, although I think the movie is responsible for the popular perception of it being slimy rather than just flimsy and diaphanous.
 
The idea of ectoplasm far predates Ghostbusters, although I think the movie is responsible for the popular perception of it being slimy rather than just flimsy and diaphanous.
The idea of ectoplasm goes back a long way - I'm not going to look up the history of ghost sightings right now. It's like a kind of mist, I suppose, usually white, although I've heard of other colorings (see LupusDei's post above).
 
I've had a few plots that did turn into stories, including three chapters of a series, that I never published. The stories just weren't working out. I still have the files if I ever want to get back to them. So they are not truly dead, but in limbo? (Possibly forever.)
limbo, limbo, limbo..ghost at a beach party. seduces his ex-gf
 
limbo, limbo, limbo..ghost at a beach party. seduces his ex-gf
I already wrote one ghost story that I linked to above. That was a while back, and I'm not "feeling" another one at the moment. The ghost in that one had some characteristics of various ghost sightings.

1. She did take a "solid" form that made her seem human to the guy encountering her. That's actually pretty rare among the various sightings I've heard about.
2. She only seemed to haunt a single location, and at a certain time - between midnight and dawn.
3. The location had a significance. It was the site of the suicide of the original person, I think it was in the early 1910s.

Earlier extreme events are often linked to ghosts. Battlefields are an example. I wouldn't hang around at Gettysburg at night. And certainly not Auschwitz.
 
Back
Top