How to fix the air pollution problem, by Muffie

KillerMuffin

Seraphically Disinclined
Joined
Jul 29, 2000
Posts
25,603
Actually it's easy. Address the source of the problem. That's what no one is doing and that's the one thing that world leaders will never ever everever ever do. Why? The source of the problem isn't big business or the oil industry. The source of the problem are the consumers.

That's the easy part. The hard part is doing anything about it. I mean honestly, who here is going to give up driving four blocks to buy a cheeseburger when they can drive? How many miles do we log on our vehicles--globally--that could actually be logged afoot or on bicycles?

How many of us set the AC to 69 and the heater to 74? How many of us leave lights on that aren't in use? How many of us use 60 or 75 watt bulbs when a 15 or a 40 will suffice?

How many of us don't recycle? How many of us don't buy recycled products? How many of us use paper plates because we're too lazy to wash dishes?

How many of us expect instant gratification for our wants and then throw them away when we're through with them?

We've got a pan-industrialized nation consumption problem. The US is the worst, but we began the concept of assembly products and assembly failure built into them. After all, GM doesn't want you to buy one Chevy in your life, they want you to buy a new one every five years.

We have been trained to be consumers who expect instant gratification and the freedom to waste with it. We have allowed ourselves to be that way.

A lot of people bitch and whine because the US didn't sign that idiot and utterly useless Kyoto fiction. I think that people should realize that environmentalism is political suicide in any country.

The third world wants their chance to get rich at the expense of the environment and there are those who think they should get to do that. Should we also allow the descendents of slaves to get their change to get rich at the expense of white slaves? Learn from mistakes, don't repeat them.

The industrialized world has a problem. They know there's pollution and it's bad. They blame big business for it. The people who live in those nations blame big business for it. The governments blame business for it. I don't. I blame the plain old ordinary consumer for it. I blame the guy on the street. I blame you and I blame me for it. We don't live because of big business. Big business exists because of us. We guide how they do business by purchasing things and by our lifestyles.

Currently, our lifestyle is to waste over recycle, drive over walk, and use energy as if it were limitless instead of expensive in terms of ecological damage.

I've said that the Kyoto Protocol would never work for a variety of reasons. Mostly that it has built in failure devices, will send normal increasing pollution and economic power and comfort to other parts of the world, and that it gives a false sense of actually having done something instead of making things worse.

The main reason that I know that Kyoto will fail is because it makes no allowances and never addresses the actual source of the problem with a do-able solution. Instead, it slaps at big business, puts a crippling burden on economies already verging on depression, and pretends that it's all hunky dory.

Meanwhile, millions of Americans, millions of British, Millions of Germans, millions of Japanese, millions of Canadians, millions upon millions of Europeans get up in the morning and leave lights on that they're not using, drive a car when they could ride a bicycle, throw away paper plates instead of washing dishes, and throw away things that should be recycled. The consumer that drives the environmentally devestating economy never changes, never does anything. Instead he complains about the prices at the pumps, how much energy costs, and resists any governmental policies that force him or her to reduce their waste.

Kyoto will fail and there will be no workable treaty until the environment is practically unlivable because the people who are responsible for the way things are haven't changed and don't even know they should. Government officials aren't about to lay the blame where it belongs or force change because they know which side their bread is buttered on.

That's what I was thinking about today.
 
That's entirely too true, Muffie.

You don't even consider the heath costs of not walking or biking, of motorsports instead of other forms of recreation.
 
*cringe* God, don't get PC started about the volume of air pollution my car emits per minute. He's already threatened to torch it the next time I'm not looking. :)
 
/Great post KM. Very thought provoking.

Have bike will travel (It's powered by cheeseburgers and pizza only) LOL. I ride all the time. Well, sometimes it's powered with a little gas, I'm a guy after all. :rolleyes: But it's all "natural". :)
 
What pisses me off is.. our city didn't contract with the recycling company to pick up plastic milk cartons.

I have to drive 8 miles just to get rid of them.
 
I agree with most of what you say, and would add to your defense of business.

The big 3 automotive manufacturers now require any supplier to be working toward ISO 14000 certification. The deadline for achieving certification is within the next few years, depending on which of the big three you sell to. ISO 14000 is an international environmental standard in the same vein as ISO 9000, the international quality standard.

To achieve certification, a company must continually reduce its waste stream by either lowering generation, or by recycling. Most industries have recycled waste metals for many years. Much of the car you drive today (as well as any bicycle) is manufactured from recycled metals. Much of the plastic used today is also recycled from waste bottles and from the normal waste generated during the molding process. This certification is required only in the automotive industry, but as with QS 9000, it will spread quickly.

One of the difficulties in recycling consumer waste is volume and location. One of the most recycled products today is the aluminum beverage can. Often, recycling centers stop accepting them because handling of the waste, transportation of the relatively small volumes to a smelter, etc. drives the cost of recycling aluminum cans higher than the cost of new aluminum. The same situation often exists with paper, plastic bottles, and glass.

This is the price the US pays for being blessed with natural resources. In other less fortunate countries, the situation is very different. I spent 1971 in the military in Korea. Every day, the waste paper, cans, bottles, etc. from the 100+ man compound was hauled to a dump near the local villiage. In the year I was there, nothing ever stayed in the dump for more than a few hours.

Business does cause waste in the form of packaging of consumer goods, and this irritates me. How many times do we purchase a sealed bottle of over the counter medicine or a cosmetic that is enclosed in a sealed box? I understand about intentional, in-store contamination, but the box is designed to attract, more than to protect the consumer. The same situation exists with many of the food products we purchase. Have you seen the peanut butter "slices" enclosed in plastic wrap just like cheese slices and then placed in a box. Doesn't a recyclable glass jar (not plastic) work just as well? Perhaps there are those of us who can not wield a knife and spread our own. And to top it all off, you get everything put in an extraordinary number of flimsy plastic bags. Yes, you can recycle the bags, but good old paper bags are renewable, you don't get as many, and they can be recycled too.

You're right about the consumer bearing most of the blame. If we didn't buy this stuff, the makers would quit packaging it this way.
 
Good thoughts KM.

ronde said:
Business does cause waste in the form of packaging of consumer goods, and this irritates me. How many times do we purchase a sealed bottle of over the counter medicine or a cosmetic that is enclosed in a sealed box? I understand about intentional, in-store contamination, but the box is designed to attract, more than to protect the consumer.
...
You're right about the consumer bearing most of the blame. If we didn't buy this stuff, the makers would quit packaging it this way.

I'd quibble that business isn't causing the waste, consumer demand and government regulation is causing the waste in the case of sealed boxes containing sealed bottles.

If WE, the consumers, objected with our pocketbooks by buying other products that don't use them, the boxes would go away.

If WE, the consumers, protest to our elected representatives that the regualtions that require double sealing are over-protective and wasteful, the regulations would get changed.

There is one other point to consider:

If WE, the consumers, ride bikes, walk, or use public transport systems instead of driving we'll be healthier and slimmer and can enjoy the benefits of a cleaner environment more.
 
Bowing to Her Muffiness

You are correct, Muf. This is consumer driven. It is the choices that we make that determine what industry and bussiness provide. If we want paper plates, they will find the trees to cut down and the water to mess up to see that we have them. In a market driven ecnoomy, it will always be so. There are those who will say that government and indrusty limit our choices, but hte plain truth is that if there is a way to provide a product profitably, then it will be, if there is a market for it.
 
Ideas for consumers to make a choice....

You can take your own bag to the grocery store and not use their plastic bags (I do that unless I have a really big order).

Tell McDonalds to keep the bags and not take more napkins than you need

Move closer to your workplace if possible.

Telecommute if you can.

Carpool.


There's probably millions of suggests that people have.
 
Buy local products/farmgoods. Cuts out the transport and packaging as well as supports your local community. Look under farmer's markets in the classifieds.

Why don't more people buy recycled paper products? They take the least amount of space on the store shelf. Granted you have to look for them but you can usually find them.
 
Typical alibiing for big business, blaming the victims, putting the cart before the horse, reversing reality.
 
REDWAVE said:
Typical alibiing for big business, blaming the victims, putting the cart before the horse, reversing reality.
Red, learn the word synbiosis.
 
I disagree. The air quality problem is not caused by me not recycling (though I do, don't get me wrong). I never asked for Styrofoam.

Like it or not, "big business" is who profits from the production and sale of goods that pollute. Business makes decisions based on profit, not on what's best for everyone in the long run. The idea that if we all got together and waved big green banners then corporations would - without regulation and out of the goodness of their hearts - quit dumping gunk into our rivers, oceans, and atmosphere is incredibly naive.

We accept that individual people in America have to abide by certain laws as part of living in society. I can't throw soda cans out the window of my car. I can't dump my trash can in the middle of the beach.

So why is it when limits are placed on how much damage a corporation can do on the environment, people start whining about "free trade" and "government interference"? In a free society, there would still be laws prohibiting murder and rape, yes? Is it not logical that in the world of business - like ANY system run by humans - there should be rules to keep businesses from doing undue harm on society, just as there are rules preventing individuals from doing the same thing?

And the whole "Government Evil, Big Business Good" is silly. They're both run by the same people, for chrissake. If you don't trust one, you're silly to put bilnd faith in the other.
 
Laurel said:
I disagree. The air quality problem is not caused by me not recycling ...

...The idea that if we all got together and waved big green banners then corporations would - without regulation and out of the goodness of their hearts - quit dumping gunk into our rivers, oceans, and atmosphere is incredibly naive.

No, the problem is not YOU, it's US -- "WE, The consumers," are responsible collectively for buying from corporations that pollute instead of boycotting them. Boycotts do work although they're incredibly difficult to organize effectively -- especiallywhen BIG business is the target.


KM, proposed a simplistic solution to make the point that pollution and waste are part of the developed world's lifestyle and that IF consumers changed what they demanded from the producers, then change would happen. It's a very BIG "IF" and KM admitted that her solution would never happen when she proposed it.

I had the Cartoon Network on for background noise this morning, and was too lazyto change the channel whenCaptain Planet came on -- this morning's epsiode made exactly KM's point: If the consumers are greedy, then the producers don't have to worryabout the environment. If the consumers can moderate greed and laziness, then pollution can be controlled.
 
Back
Top