Pure
Fiel a Verdad
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2001
- Posts
- 15,135
The Earl said,
Pure: Never mind whether you have a grievance with Pear, or any prior history,[1] isn't it simply manners to ask, even if you know she'd say no? [2]And surely if you know that someone doesn't want their story discussed, wouldn't it be polite to leave it alone? There are a few other authors out on Lit, I'm sure you could find one to suit your needs.
[3]I don't think it's a matter of grudges of legality. It's a matter of manners and I think you could have done better.
I'm just going over this old ground once, but your posting is a good one to answer, I think.
To your first question, yes, it would have been good manners to ask. I regret not doing so. Indeed I would apologize to her if it would mean anything.
It's always better to be courteous in all cases, *even where one is being shown discourtesy.* Look at how good policemen deal with insults.
In mitigation, I can only say that continuing discourtesy was reacted to (I merely notified her at the time of the posting); 'flaming' or insulting posts being directed at me for many months, and even a couple days ago, *subsequent to this flare up. But that is not an excuse.
To your second question: If an author publishes anywhere, or posts to a free site, I believe *anyone may comment as much as they like, and using as many quotations as they like within the fair usage guidelines. So yes, it would be polite to ask, but no I would not accept any author's veto over 'critical' discussion, which, you will note, did occur. (I.e., she wasn't just flamed in the guise of criticism as has been suggested.) Hence it's also permitted to critically discuss works by those who swear enmity. Indeed in 'free speech' areas it's permitted to say, of either strangers' or enemies' works, "This is trashy writing."
To your last point. Yes my manners could have been better. I'm sure they will improve. That said, the issue of 'unmannerliness' is NOT the same as US law breaking or Lit. rule breaking. It utterly confounds the discussion to blur that issue.
Other than ceasing to comment on a particular story, I'm open to your suggestions as to how to resolve matters and bring peace. I even made proposals in the thread and privately, and they were all ignored.
Best,
J.
Pure: Never mind whether you have a grievance with Pear, or any prior history,[1] isn't it simply manners to ask, even if you know she'd say no? [2]And surely if you know that someone doesn't want their story discussed, wouldn't it be polite to leave it alone? There are a few other authors out on Lit, I'm sure you could find one to suit your needs.
[3]I don't think it's a matter of grudges of legality. It's a matter of manners and I think you could have done better.
I'm just going over this old ground once, but your posting is a good one to answer, I think.
To your first question, yes, it would have been good manners to ask. I regret not doing so. Indeed I would apologize to her if it would mean anything.
It's always better to be courteous in all cases, *even where one is being shown discourtesy.* Look at how good policemen deal with insults.
In mitigation, I can only say that continuing discourtesy was reacted to (I merely notified her at the time of the posting); 'flaming' or insulting posts being directed at me for many months, and even a couple days ago, *subsequent to this flare up. But that is not an excuse.
To your second question: If an author publishes anywhere, or posts to a free site, I believe *anyone may comment as much as they like, and using as many quotations as they like within the fair usage guidelines. So yes, it would be polite to ask, but no I would not accept any author's veto over 'critical' discussion, which, you will note, did occur. (I.e., she wasn't just flamed in the guise of criticism as has been suggested.) Hence it's also permitted to critically discuss works by those who swear enmity. Indeed in 'free speech' areas it's permitted to say, of either strangers' or enemies' works, "This is trashy writing."
To your last point. Yes my manners could have been better. I'm sure they will improve. That said, the issue of 'unmannerliness' is NOT the same as US law breaking or Lit. rule breaking. It utterly confounds the discussion to blur that issue.
Other than ceasing to comment on a particular story, I'm open to your suggestions as to how to resolve matters and bring peace. I even made proposals in the thread and privately, and they were all ignored.
Best,
J.

)