M
Mister_Chris
Guest
My stories are scoring poorly, and aren't attracting readers.
I can live with lower scores than I had expected; the scoring system can be easily gamed, and doesn't necessarily reflect the quality of writing in any case. Or so I tell myself.
But my lack of market penetration is puzzling me greatly.
Typically, many stories on Lit are running 50,000 to 100,000 views; by comparison, my best two stories have each attracted slightly less than 30,000 views, while my most recent - posted 4 days ago - has attracted a measly 4,600 views.
And that's pathetic.
In reviewing views numbers from other writers, it's clear that stories with multiple chapters lose views very rapidly; by the time you reach chapter three, you've typically lost 30% to 50% of your readers. In my case, it's much worse; Milk and cookies part 1 brought in 29,001 views, while part two brought in 4,622 views - a stunning 84% drop. The numbers will probably improve a bit as part two ages, but even so, it's going to be mind numbingly bad. And neither story scored particularly well.
So. Low scores, few readers.
There are conclusions which can be reached from that.
Thoughts, anyone?
>MC
I can live with lower scores than I had expected; the scoring system can be easily gamed, and doesn't necessarily reflect the quality of writing in any case. Or so I tell myself.
But my lack of market penetration is puzzling me greatly.
Typically, many stories on Lit are running 50,000 to 100,000 views; by comparison, my best two stories have each attracted slightly less than 30,000 views, while my most recent - posted 4 days ago - has attracted a measly 4,600 views.
And that's pathetic.
In reviewing views numbers from other writers, it's clear that stories with multiple chapters lose views very rapidly; by the time you reach chapter three, you've typically lost 30% to 50% of your readers. In my case, it's much worse; Milk and cookies part 1 brought in 29,001 views, while part two brought in 4,622 views - a stunning 84% drop. The numbers will probably improve a bit as part two ages, but even so, it's going to be mind numbingly bad. And neither story scored particularly well.
So. Low scores, few readers.
There are conclusions which can be reached from that.
Thoughts, anyone?
>MC