'Hobbit' Brain Supports Species Theory

R. Richard

Literotica Guru
Joined
Jul 24, 2003
Posts
10,382
The following is cutting edge stuff. The evidence seems to be mounting that the little people skeltons found in Indonesia could indeed be a separate species of human being. I stress "seems." There is a lot of work remaining to be done, but there are several, similar skeltons. Either you have to postulate a viable community of microcephalic dwarves, or a new species. Comments?


'Hobbit' Brain Supports Species Theory

By JOSEPH B. VERRENGIA, AP Science Writer

Scientists working with powerful imaging computers say the spectacular "Hobbit" fossil recently discovered in Indonesia had distinctive brain features that could justify its classification as a separate — and tiny — human ancestor.

The new report, published Thursday in the online journal Science Express, seems to support the idea of a sophisticated human dwarf species marooned for eons while modern man proliferated.

The new research produced a computer-generated model that compared surface impressions on the inside of the fossil skull with brain casts of modern and ancient humans, as well as chimps and other primates.

The scientists said the model shows that the 3-foot specimen, nicknamed Hobbit, had a brain unlike anything they had seen before in the human lineage. The brain is chimplike in size, about 417 cubic centimeters.

Yet the Hobbit's brain shared wrinkled surface features with the much larger brains of both modern humans and Homo erectus, a tool-making ancestor that lived in southeast Asia more than 1 million years ago. Some of those brain features are consistent with higher cognitive traits.

These brain features coincide with physical evidence of advanced behaviors, such as hunting, firemaking and the use of stone tools, which were found alongside the bones in a cave on the remote equatorial island of Flores. To some, this suggests an organized society of tiny hunters flourished on the island for millennia at a time when modern humans dominated the planet.

"This is a unique creature," said Florida State University anthropologist Dean Falk, who led the study. "We found amazing, specialized features across the surface from front to back."

"These findings are consistent with the kinds of sophisticated behaviors that are hypothesized" for the Hobbit, Falk said, but she stopped short of saying the Hobbit was a tool-maker.

In October, scientists from Indonesia and Australia caused an international sensation with their report of a trove of tiny fossils. As many as eight individuals were represented in layers that were dated from 95,000 to 12,000 years ago. The Hobbit skeleton was the most complete specimen and contained the only skull.

In a project funded by the National Geographic (news - web sites) Society, Falk and researchers from Washington University in St. Louis created a three-dimensional computer model of the brain using CT scans of the interior of the Hobbit's skull. Known as virtual endocasts, these images show the wrinkles, vessels and other surface features that made faint impressions on the skull's lining.

They compared that model with the brains of chimps, a female Homo erectus, a contemporary woman, a pygmy and a European specimen of a person with a small-brain syndrome known as microcephaly.

Scientists say its brain shape is most closely associated with that of Homo erectus. However, it also reflects some features of modern humans, including:

_A fissure near the back of the brain known as the lunate sulcus, similarly found in the modern human brain. "I almost fell over seeing this feature in something so small," Falk said.

_A swollen temporal lobe, the mid-brain area between the ears where hearing, memory, image identification and emotions are processed.

_A part of the frontal lobe near the eyes that is thought to be involved in planning and initiative-taking.

Such advanced brain features were especially surprising because the rest of the skeleton has more primitive traits like coarse teeth and an apelike pelvis similar to human ancestors that emerged in Africa some 4 million years ago.

"It's a really strange combination of traits," said Michael J. Morwood of the University of New England in Australia, one of the Hobbit's excavators. "It is a new, diminutive human species."

Whether the Hobbit evolved into a dwarfed form of Homo erectus or hails from another, older human cousin is unknown, he said.

Other human evolution specialists were split over the new report.

Katerina Semendeferi of the University of California-San Diego described it as a "cutting edge study." While the Hobbit brain does not fit neatly into an evolutionary pattern, she said it is too much to expect that all species would have brain sizes that would neatly transition in size from ape to modern human.

But some experts dismissed the brain-scan study as "trivial." Primatologist Robert Martin, provost of the Field Museum in Chicago, said the Hobbit probably was a modern human that suffered from a form of microcephaly.

But Falk said the Hobbit brain was quite different from the brain of a modern human with abnormal brain growth, or a human pygmy.
 
Yeah, yeah.

I'm at home, and nowhere near you. So shut up about it. OK?

Or I'll tell your students you wank in the shower.
 
_A fissure near the back of the brain known as the lunate sulcus, similarly found in the modern human brain. "I almost fell over seeing this feature in something so small," Falk said.
See, you and I would never have fallen over. It shows the upside of ignorance: you really have to know in order to realize what's appalling.
 
Well, what you did to me over the years were pretty appalling too, you know.
 
cantdog said:
See, you and I would never have fallen over. It shows the upside of ignorance: you really have to know in order to realize what's appalling.

I don't know about you, but I am really quite proud of MY lunate sulcus!
 
R. Richard said:
I don't know about you, but I am really quite proud of MY lunate sulcus!
Is your "boyfriend" black and furry? Does he take shower with you? Do you use butter for "him?"
 
svet:
You seem to have a problem with my thread. You remind me of a guy complaining that the food was totally inedible and the portions were too small. Are we off our meds here?
 
R. Richard said:
svet:
You seem to have a problem with my thread. You remind me of a guy complaining that the food was totally inedible and the portions were too small. Are we off our meds here?

No. CV is just lonely again.
 
RR

The overall evidence on humanoid remains suggests several species may have co-existed over the last 2.5 million years. In Africa it appears two species lived alongside one another some 1.5 million years ago, one versed in tools and the other not. 'We' are not believed to have descended from either species. One curious anomoly is the discover of identical species in Africa and former Java dating over 1 million years ago, quite how they managed to evolve in two places is a current mystery not aided by the very very few humanoid remains discovered. The current Indonesian find quadrupals the number of remains unearthed between Indonesia and the Alps, scant resources upon which to create an evolution of a species.
 
I think it would be nice if it turns out that we have a almost-human species still alive today.


Seeing as the French were such a disappointment...
 
Svenskaflicka said:
I think it would be nice if it turns out that we have a almost-human species still alive today.


Seeing as the French were such a disappointment...

ROFPMSL!!!
 
Svenskaflicka said:
I think it would be nice if it turns out that we have a almost-human species still alive today.


Seeing as the French were such a disappointment...

Ouch

That was a shot well below the belt. :kiss:

Cat
 
SeaCat said:
Ouch

That was a shot well below the belt. :kiss:

Cat

The truth hurts.

Ok, maybe not as much as jumping in a bicycle that doesn't have a seat, but it still hurts.
 
Dranoel said:
The truth hurts.

Ok, maybe not as much as jumping in a bicycle that doesn't have a seat, but it still hurts.
Too true, all too true.
On the other hand, you did notice I loved her comment?

Cat

P.S. There are a few people I wouldn't mind seeing slowly climb onto that bike, just for novelties sake mind you. :devil:
 
Thanks for the post :)

I did a little checking, it seems the brain scan technology is so advanced it's still not really accepted. Should be interesting to see what comes of the discovery over time and if the ideas put forward bear up.
 
Back
Top