Hey you feminist cowards. Step up and tell me how this is NOT female privilege.

[LJ_Reloaded]

https://www.sunderlandecho.com/news...g-to-jail-judge-tells-woman-burglar-1-8716758

Terry Remmer sneaked into the house of a "frightened" older man, in Washington in the early hours of August 14 last year and made off with an abundance of goods.

However Recorder Mark Lowe, QC, handed the 23-year-old a suspended sentence - warning her that she would have been jailed if she was a man.

Prosecutor Paul Newcombe said: "This case was an occupied dwelling house burglary and the occupant was disturbed.

"He awoke at 5am to hear someone was creeping around the house. He heard items being moved and he was frightened.

Come on, speak up you cowards. Tell us how this is not female privilege.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Come on, speak up you cowards. Tell us how this is not female privilege.

Because sexist judges aren't something that just females benefit from.

https://media.tenor.com/images/f29ecfc4ef4faa6ec32bdab486b07d9c/tenor.gif

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Because sexist judges aren't something that just females benefit from.

https://media.tenor.com/images/f29ecfc4ef4faa6ec32bdab486b07d9c/tenor.gif

The pro-feminist Huffington Post says you're an idiot

https://i.imgur.com/VzcgqSB.gif

Bye, Felicia!

 

[BotanyBoy]

The pro-feminist Huffington Post

Well there you go being wrong again...that's never existed dummy.

But sexist judges aren't just a female thing and nothing in that huff post article even tries to suggest otherwise.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Well there you go being wrong again...that's never existed dummy.

It exists right here you fucking retard

But sexist judges aren't just a female thing

Please quote the post where I said it was. That post never existed, dummy.

However, feminists are the ones calling for an end to jails for women altogether.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/post...ing-women-in-jail-for-anything/?noredirect=on

 

[BotanyBoy]

It exists right here you fucking retard

Oh I thought you said pre-feminist....my mistake.

You're still wrong about the female privilege though.

Please quote the post where I said it was.

In the OP dummy....you very clearly and explicitly assume that this sexist judge is somehow a privilege that all females enjoy.

Come on, speak up you cowards. Tell us how this is not female privilege.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Oh I thought you said pre-feminist....my mistake.

You're still wrong about the female privilege though.

Nope, you're wrong and I'm right and this settles it unless you can show where this citation is wrong.

Yet another study shows female privilege is real when it comes to sentencing.

And another.

The facts are stacking up pretty high against you, idiot.

Disprove these citations. Otherwise you have no case. Women get shorter sentences than men for the same crime. Established fact. That is female privilege. You got nothing.

You're dismissed, permanently.

 

[BotanyBoy]

The facts are stacking up pretty high against you, idiot.

Opinions and assumptions.....not facts.

Disprove these citations.

Every one of them is based on the idea that individuals and single instances of choice/behavior = demographic wide privilege/oppression.

Which is just as much bullshit as any other sexist/racist assumption or ascription of an entire demographic, it's just not true.

Not all women get off easy,

https://www*****deathprizes.com/real-life-crime/women-on-death-row-31093

So it's not a female privilege....it's just a sexist judge/jury.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

BotanyBoy This user is on your Ignore List.

And he exists no more!


Another report that DESTROYS the idea that female privilege doesn't exist.

https://www.law.umich.edu/newsandinfo/features/Pages/starr_gender_disparities.aspx

If you're a criminal defendant, it may help—a lot—to be a woman. At least, that's what Prof. Sonja Starr's research on federal criminal cases suggests. Prof. Starr's recent paper, "Estimating Gender Disparities in Federal Criminal Cases," looks closely at a large dataset of federal cases, and reveals some significant findings. After controlling for the arrest offense, criminal history, and other prior characteristics, "men receive 63% longer sentences on average than women do," and "[w]omen are…twice as likely to avoid incarceration if convicted." This gender gap is about six times as large as the racial disparity that Prof. Starr found in another recent paper.

There are other studies that have shown gender disparity in criminal cases, but not as pronounced as Prof. Starr's findings. This is because she is looking at "a larger swath of the criminal justice process" in her analysis, she said. The paper states, "Existing studies have typically focused on single stages of the criminal process in isolation"—in particular, the judge's final sentencing decision. These studies compare actual sentencing outcomes after controlling for the recommended sentence associated with the defendant's ultimate conviction. The problem with this, Starr explains, is that "the key control variable is itself the result of a host of discretionary decisions made earlier in the justice process"—including prosecutors' charging and plea-bargaining decisions. Starr's research incorporates disparities found at those earlier stages, and finds that "more disparity is introduced at each phase of the justice process."

After estimating the amount of disparity left unexplained by the arrest offense and other control variables, the paper explores "why these gaps exist—and, in particular, whether unobserved differences between men and women might justify them." Prof. Starr explores several potential mitigating factors, such as the "girlfriend theory" (that "[w]omen might be viewed as…mere accessories of their male romantic partners"), the role of women as primary caregivers to their children, and the "theory that female defendants receive leniency because they are more cooperative with the government." Although each of these theories found some support in the data, they did not appear capable of explaining anything close to the total disparity that Prof. Starr found.

Prof. Starr emphasized that it is not possible to "prove" gender discrimination with data like hers, because it is always possible that two seemingly similar cases could differ in ways not captured by the data. Given the size of the apparent gender gap and the richness of the dataset (which allowed many alternative explanations to be explored), however, Starr believes that there is "pretty good reason to suspect that disparate treatment may be one of the causes of this gap."

 

[BotanyBoy]

BotanyBoy This user is on your Ignore List.

And he exists no more!

LOL what a coward.

Stay triggered LT!!

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

LOL BotanyBoy you lost this fight as soon as I posted this thread.

 

[pointless]

you know, i don't care that sneaked is technically the correct choice. snuck just feels better to me.

so suck a dick, english.

 

[BotanyBoy]

LOL BotanyBoy you lost this fight as soon as I posted this thread.

That must be why you crawled off into your iggy bunker all triggered the fuck out

 

[Boxlicker101]

I have always said that women are treated more leniently than men. They get shorter sentences and are less likely to be sentenced to death for the same crimes. In addition, they probably escape conviction more often because it is believed they are the more gentle sex. As for the list, posted by BB, of women who were executed or are on death row, they all deserved it. Men in the same jurisdictions would have gotten the same punishment.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Because sexist judges aren't something that just females benefit from.

https://media.tenor.com/images/f29ecfc4ef4faa6ec32bdab486b07d9c/tenor.gif

Why would men benefit from women getting lighter sentences from sexist judges? I'm not saying men are harmed; I'm just saying they don't benefit.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Why would men benefit from women getting lighter sentences from sexist judges?

Because not all sexist judges are sexist against men.

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Why would men benefit from women getting lighter sentences from sexist judges? I'm not saying men are harmed; I'm just saying they don't benefit.

Botanyboy is an idiot. And men are harmed - because they are often the victims of these violent women, who are encouraged to keep doing it because of the crap sentences they get.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...-norman-adelaide-australia-evie-a7934241.html

Woman convicted of hitting eight-month-old baby with slotted spoon walks free
Lorien Norman avoids a prison sentence as daughter's injuries were likely to 'completely resolve'

An Australian woman who hit her eight-month-old daughter with a large slotted cooking spoon, has avoided a prison sentence.

Lorien Norman, 26, from Adelaide, was convicted of causing harm with intent after repeatedly striking her child Evie.

Female privilege. Botanyboy cannot refute the fact that judges favor women when it comes to sentencing. His case was dead as soon as this thread was posted.

 

[beew]

Here you go, Kim.
If you feel thirsty and keen to try to de-ball a guy, do it here.

*You got me wrong. I'm not a man.*

 

[LJ_Reloaded]

Here you go, Kim.
If you feel thirsty and keen to try to de-ball a guy, do it here.

*You got me wrong. I'm not a man.*

Kim? As in KKKimGordon? LOL I want KKKimmy to come in here and argue that women get equal sentences for the same crime. I won't even have to sharpen my teeth for all the self-inflicted gashes she regularly scores on herself.

 

[KimGordon67]

Here you go, Kim.
If you feel thirsty and keen to try to de-ball a guy, do it here.

*You got me wrong. I'm not a man.*

I have no idea why you think I want to de-ball anyone - the discussion we were having had nothing to do with gender whatsoever.

And I gave up trying to work around LJ's twisted 'logic' long ago ... his thought processes aren't even vaguely linear, which is why he perpetually thinks he's 'won' something. If he wants to think women are dealt with more leniently by the criminal justice system, that's fine with me.

 

[beew]

Kim? As in KKKimGordon? LOL I want KKKimmy to come in here and argue that women get equal sentences for the same crime. I won't even have to sharpen my teeth for all the self-inflicted gashes she regularly scores on herself.

She's a fucking moron.
She purposefully distorted a post of mine, in order to prop herself.

What? Does me criticising nowisthetime's ageist slurs and stalking (I used to like her before that, btw),
automatically mean that I criticize all Black people from the States?

They're not a monolithic group, they are folks and folks. Just like any other ethnic group.
I like some of them, others - not that much. Depending on how our personalities and temperaments match.

 

[KimGordon67]

She's a fucking moron.
She purposefully distorted a post of mine, in order to prop herself.

What? Does me criticising nowisthetime's ageist slurs and stalking (I used to like her before that, btw),
automatically mean that I criticize all Black people from the States?

They're not a monolithic group, they are folks and folks. Just like any other ethnic group.
I like some of them, others - not that much. Depending on how our personalities and temperaments match.[/QUOTE/]

LMAO ... it's like being on a primary school playground. Have fun you two - don't hurt yourselves on the monkey bars.

 

[RocketLauncher]

Statistics prove that men commit more and heinous crimes. Women are generally jailed for minor financial crimes. If women were committing the same crimes and receiving lighter sentences then you might have a point.
Tbh didn't read article.
But, tell that to the the women in Saudi Ammurikha.
White privilege, male privilege, green privilege, a lot of privileges being handed out so why the fuck not female privilege?

 

[BotanyBoy]

But, tell that to the the women in Saudi Ammurikha.

Saudi Ammurikha?

I'm betting you've never been to one or either country have you?

 

[RocketLauncher]

Saudi Ammurikha?

I'm betting you've never been to one or either country have you?

https://money.cnn.com/2016/04/19/investing/saudi-arabia-threat-dump-us-assets-911-bill/index.html

Considering the Bin Laden's bought Georgie Porgie his first oil field I'd say there were pretty close ties between the two countries. Even Congress is loathe to admit just how much of the U.S debt is owned by the Saudis. I'm calling shenanigans.
Been to the States many times, North East Coast, mainly but I'm supposing that's not indicative of the general U.S population. And, no fucking way I'd step one foot in Saudi Arabia, my mama didn't raise no fool.