Harvard: Gun Control Isn't The Answer

[unregistered]

 

[koalabear]

Sure you got the info from the NRA!!!!!

 

[Busybody]

STFU with facts

 

[koalabear]

We all know the liberal harvard profs make their students join the NRA.

 

[unregistered]

 

[koalabear]

Take it easy boys, this is a major capitulation to the truth by liberaldom.

I wonder how much the NRA paid them to say that.

 

[unregistered]

 

[CHNOPS]

Mr President, distinguished delegates,

I am Gary Mauser, Professor Emeritus, of Simon Fraser University in Canada. I represent the National Firearms Association...

http://www.garymauser.net/papers.html

 

[Sean]

Mr President, distinguished delegates,

I am Gary Mauser, Professor Emeritus, of Simon Fraser University in Canada. I represent the National Firearms Association...

http://www.garymauser.net/papers.html

And the first guy is associated with this crowd:
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Pacific_Research_Institute

 

[warrior queen]

Interesting.... yet another study on what isn't the answer.
How about they sit down and work on what IS?

 

[Sean]

And they reference John Lott's work as a data source. I closed the pdf right there. Fail.

 

[chillywilly2]

Gotta be proud...only the 7th most violent nation...just behind Estonia, Latvia, Russia, Belarus...you all deserve hero cookies

 

[Sean Renaud]

Damn right we do.

 

[unregistered]

 

[warrior queen]

Young men between the age of 15 and 25. Make it illegal for them to own or possess a firearm until age 26. Exempting the military or the police.

Is there a study to back that up?

 

[Sean]

Young men between the age of 15 and 25. Make it illegal for them to own or possess a firearm until age 26. Exempting the military or the police.

Why do you hate the second amendment? And if firearms aren't the problem, what good would taking them away do?

 

[unregistered]

 

[warrior queen]

Why do you hate the second amendment? And if firearms aren't the problem, what good would taking them away do?

Good catch!

 

[unregistered]

 

[unregistered]

 

[warrior queen]

Stupid catch, admired by a dummy.

Really? You're the one who pulled up the study showing us that guns aren't the problem.
Now you say maybe they are the problem, but only in the hands of the under-25's.
So which is it?

 

[Bad_Doggie]

Young men between the age of 15 and 25. Make it illegal for them to own or possess a firearm until age 26. Exempting the military or the police.

Why do you hate the second amendment? And if firearms aren't the problem, what good would taking them away do?

You can't be President until you're 35, you can't be elected, drink, drive, until a certain age, maybe you should be mature enough to possess firearms as well. The record shows that Latino and black males are responsible for the vast majority of the firearm violence in the nation, not wanting to be accused of bigotry, I've extended the suggestion to all men in that age demographic.

WTF!

Woof!

 

[unregistered]

 

[koalabear]

Gotta be proud...only the 7th most violent nation...just behind Estonia, Latvia, Russia, Belarus...you all deserve hero cookies

Considering all those countries have very strict gun laws.

 

[Bad_Doggie]

Yes I know that liberals would rather curtail the rights of all Americans in total fear of addressing the real problem, but they've been overruled. So what is your solution, puppy?

Seriously Vette; So far you’ve managed to post a clearly bogus propaganda piece against gun regulation, then just a few posts later proposed gun regulation as a solution; run roughshod over the 2nd amendment rights (as you see them and as you champion them) of a section of your community.

Your proposal makes a mockery of your original post and other views.

You know my views I’ve posted them often enough; all other “for like” western nations have some form of gun control/registration and all of them have less per capital rates of crime against the person and death rates with a firearm. Now why do you think that might be?

Woof!