Hard Rom and other whiners.

[underguy1]

This was pretty funny.

First of you lying pretending piece of shit Yank clown, it is not my article. Check the link.
Second it is meant as a comparison of only two systems, of two countries closely linked by culture and geography.

You are a liar. You are not in New Zealand. Nor do you shyte about the Westminster Parliamentary system which runs the country you claim to be from.

You are chicken shit troll who thinks he can pretend to be something other than a trollish Yank.

I took you off my iggy list long enough to see if you were demonstrating some knowledge of New Zealand politics. Even as a republican leaning New Zealander you would have had some worthwhile comment to make.

You are a fucking liar and a troll.

Back on the iggy list you go. Say Hi to the racists, trolls and stupid fucks who populate it.

I challenge the pathetic whining Canadian or any of his whining fellow trolls to show any evidence that I'm not a 57 year old guy living in New Zealand.

As a hissy fit, it's quite amusing. As the intended ad hominem, it only works if you can show something to support your silly accusations.

You can't.

You're a wanker.

 

[hashtag45]

HardRom and Sean

L.O.L.

 

[hashtag45]

First of you lying pretending piece of shit Yank clown, it is not my article. Check the link.
Second it is meant as a comparison of only two systems, of two countries closely linked by culture and geography.

You are a liar. You are not in New Zealand. Nor do you shyte about the Westminster Parliamentary system which runs the country you claim to be from.

You are chicken shit troll who thinks he can pretend to be something other than a trollish Yank.

I took you off my iggy list long enough to see if you were demonstrating some knowledge of New Zealand politics. Even as a republican leaning New Zealander you would have had some worthwhile comment to make.

You are a fucking liar and a troll.

Back on the iggy list you go. Say Hi to the racists, trolls and stupid fucks who populate it.

........

 

[Que]

This is the result of the CSI generation. Everyone seems to think that the word evidence mean DNA extracted from fingernail scrapings.

In the very post that you quoted he presented evidence. It might be refutable evidence, you might have evidence that stronger than that but he did present evidence it's called circumstantial evidence. He pesented it and you did nothing to refute it other than your usual 7th grade debate team fail tactics.

You're exactly like the Clintonistas, "I tell you there's no evidence. No evidence at all damn it!"

Oddly they seem to understand the concept of strong circumstantial evidence when it comes to their opponents. "With that many allegations all seeming to corroborate each other you have to assume there's something there. Where there's that much smoke there's gotta be a little fire."

 

[Disgustipated]

This n00b needs to ask the old heads on how to make a proper vanity thread.

 

[underguy1]

This is the result of the CSI generation. Everyone seems to think that the word evidence mean DNA extracted from fingernail scrapings.

In the very post that you quoted he presented evidence. It might be refutable evidence, you might have evidence that stronger than that but he did present evidence it's called circumstantial evidence. He pesented it and you did nothing to refute it other than your usual 7th grade debate team fail tactics.

You're exactly like the Clintonistas, "I tell you there's no evidence. No evidence at all damn it!"

Oddly they seem to understand the concept of strong circumstantial evidence when it comes to their opponents. "With that many allegations all seeming to corroborate each other you have to assume there's something there. Where there's that much smoke there's gotta be a little fire."

You don't know the difference between evidence and assertion.

Along with many many other things.

 

[Que]

No Perry Mason, this is where you object to the actual evidence and have it thrown out because it's largely hearsay.

This is not where you pound the table and claim that it's an assertion The only assertion is making is that you are not who you say you are. That's fairly evident to anybody who's had the misfortune of interacting with you. All of those combined observations if anyone chooses to mention them for evidence that's testamentary evidence. He is not a third-party reporting what it is that he has heard that you have posted he's testifying as to what ihe has actually observed you posting.

 

[hashtag45]

Jesus, look at Que. He's 'psychoanalysing' someone again.
Isn't he the most self-absorbed narcissistic mofo this board has ever seen.
Nevermind the icky factor in all that, just like his statements about "virile, potent" men over fifty (aka him) who are best suited for girls in their early 20's…

 

[spacekowboy]

We already did the Board Drama Thread No One Gives A Fuck About for this year back in April.
Better luck next season.

 

[Magnetron]

underboob1