Source:
https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2022-02-16/amir-locke-to-be-eulogized-at-minneapolis-service
I can imagine guns rights advocates coming to Amir Locke's defense, saying something like...'he had every right to defend himself from an unknown threat that entered the place he was sleeping in, where had committed no crime, had no reasonable reason to think his attackers were cops, had the right to defend himself and his life".
Are gun rights advocates saying this in this case or coming to his defence?
Complicating this argument I imagine....is the fact that these were cops serving a "no knock" warrant. The police made a grave error in this case, and despite this mistake, have legal grounds to shoot to kill, even in this case where a error was made.
Is this a case against absolute gun freedom based in an argument of self defense. Clearly, Locke lost his life....his rights didn't save him, owning a gun didn't save him and the police will walk away from this without any charges sticking to them...they were carrying out their jobs to the letter of the existing law.
Or, is better laws, better govt the key to saving lives like Locke's....not his gun or his gun rights...his other rights?
https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2022-02-16/amir-locke-to-be-eulogized-at-minneapolis-service
I can imagine guns rights advocates coming to Amir Locke's defense, saying something like...'he had every right to defend himself from an unknown threat that entered the place he was sleeping in, where had committed no crime, had no reasonable reason to think his attackers were cops, had the right to defend himself and his life".
Are gun rights advocates saying this in this case or coming to his defence?
Complicating this argument I imagine....is the fact that these were cops serving a "no knock" warrant. The police made a grave error in this case, and despite this mistake, have legal grounds to shoot to kill, even in this case where a error was made.
Is this a case against absolute gun freedom based in an argument of self defense. Clearly, Locke lost his life....his rights didn't save him, owning a gun didn't save him and the police will walk away from this without any charges sticking to them...they were carrying out their jobs to the letter of the existing law.
Or, is better laws, better govt the key to saving lives like Locke's....not his gun or his gun rights...his other rights?
Last edited: