Government shutdown over illegals?

We need a government shutdown every few years just to demonstrate how absolutely unnecessary most government functions are.
 
It is...........for now. The democrats so ordained.

and the sad thing is some people believe that is the cause and they don't care about the children who will no longer receive benefits. those are mostly white children in case you were unaware.
 
it's alright, i wouldn't want to try to justify this current shutdown either. btw, you guys are not doing a very good job of convincing anyone this is anything but the current administration's fault.

First off, many conservatives understand they aren't going to change the minds of those mindlessly following ideological talking points left totally unchallenged by the presence of critical thinking skills.

Some folks have to actually live the consequences of their choices to illuminate their understanding. but to address directly the quote above, the NYT's, the propaganda arm of the Democrat Party has no difficulty whatsoever in assessing the blame for the current shutdown. They blame the Democrat party.
 
We need a government shutdown every few years just to demonstrate how absolutely unnecessary most government functions are.

Truth is, few in the civil society will feel or be aware of the shutdown absent the echo chamber of the media.
 
CHIP was in this bill. The Democrats voted it down over DACA. But Republicans are to blame.
 
First off, many conservatives understand they aren't going to change the minds of those mindlessly following ideological talking points left totally unchallenged by the presence of critical thinking skills.

Some folks have to actually live the consequences of their choices to illuminate their understanding. but to address directly the quote above, the NYT's, the propaganda arm of the Democrat Party has no difficulty whatsoever in assessing the blame for the current shutdown. They blame the Democrat party.

i thought wapo was the propaganda arm of the liberal hype machine :rolleyes:

CHIP was in this bill. The Democrats voted it down over DACA. But Republicans are to blame.

like i said, the sad thing there are people like you who mistakenly believe that.
 
and the sad thing is some people believe that is the cause and they don't care about the children who will no longer receive benefits. those are mostly white children in case you were unaware.

CHIP was in this bill, but those millions of citizen children meant less to theDemocrats than their 800K illegal DACA "children" who weren't even in crises for some time yet.
 
i thought wapo was the propaganda arm of the liberal hype machine :rolleyes:



like i said, the sad thing there are people like you who mistakenly believe that.

"The House voted late Thursday to keep the government open with a short-term spending bill that included funding for CHIP. The plan – which has an uncertain future in the Senate – provides six years of financing for the program."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...about-childrens-health-insurance-program.html

Quit getting your information from VOX and SLATE.
 
CHIP was in this bill, but those millions of citizen children meant less to theDemocrats than their 800K illegal DACA "children" who weren't even in crises for some time yet.

6 years of CHIP funding was in the bill the democrats rejected so they can 'stand up' for illegal aliens.
 
CHIP was in this bill. The Democrats voted it down over DACA. But Republicans are to blame.

"The House voted late Thursday to keep the government open with a short-term spending bill that included funding for CHIP. The plan – which has an uncertain future in the Senate – provides six years of financing for the program."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...about-childrens-health-insurance-program.html

Quit getting your information from VOX and SLATE.

like i said, you don't understand and stop getting your news from infowars and breitbart.
 
http://www.cnn.com/2018/01/18/politics/trump-chip-funding-republicans/index.html

"A proposal to fund the government until mid-February unveiled by House GOP leaders earlier this week included a six-year reauthorization of the children's health insurance program, aimed at winning over key Democratic votes in the Senate."

The problem is that certain partisan sources, like CNN lead with a Trump tweet that basically states that he didn't want it to come out of a short-term bill, which, in of itself, is tacit admission that it was in the bill.
 
so none of you understand how budgeting works on top of not understanding who is affected by this shutdown. that's good to know so i don't waste my time explaining to a bunch of mini-border walls.
 
so none of you understand how budgeting works on top of not understanding who is affected by this shutdown. that's good to know so i don't waste my time explaining to a bunch of mini-border walls.

Your biggest problem is, we do understand.:rolleyes:
 
Hey Ish,

vette ran away from this question in another thread, maybe you'll answer it.

Does anybody really want to throw out good educated and accomplished young people who have jobs some serving in the military?

Democrats in the military?

LOL

All 3 of them! and they are all in the Chair Force.

A pitifully un-American sight for all to behold.

Democrats HATE the USA openly....can't wipe their own ass but they want to save the world LOL.
 
Well, why don't you explain it to us then? So far this morning, you have taken us back to the past and then when confronted by the past demanded that we return to the future (present) where we were before you joined the discussion. Then you repeatedly stated, without cite, that CHIP was not part of the bill. Given evidence that CHIP funding for six years, from sources other than Alex Jones ( :rolleyes: ), then you moved the goal again to accuse everyone else of not understanding budgeting, so I am sure, at this point, everyone would be thrilled and entertained with your display of budgetary knowledge.
 
Well, why don't you explain it to us then? So far this morning, you have taken us back to the past and then when confronted by the past demanded that we return to the future (present) where we were before you joined the discussion. Then you repeatedly stated, without cite, that CHIP was not part of the bill. Given evidence that CHIP funding for six years, from sources other than Alex Jones ( :rolleyes: ), then you moved the goal again to accuse everyone else of not understanding budgeting, so I am sure, at this point, everyone would be thrilled and entertained with your display of budgetary knowledge.

This could be amusing. :)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top