Government intervention into everything

[John_Q_Dough]

The dystopian government has instituted length and girth measurement requirements that codify groups of individuals in each quartile. Quartile D is the worst offenders and they are taken to the central repository for in adequate development.​

​

​

Central Repository for Inadequate Development (CRID)​

Administrative Overview – Section 9.0
(FLR/FLM Oversight Council White Paper, Year 2 Post-Enactment)

9.1 Mission Statement
The Central Repository for Inadequate Development (CRID) was established under Amendment 2 of the FLR/FLM Compliance Act. Its core mandate is to (a) receive and detain Class D individuals, (b) maintain biometric archives for long-term statistical study, and (c) conduct ongoing research into apparatus design, compliance reinforcement, and failure-prevention architecture. CRID functions as both an administrative holding facility and a research-and-development center for the Community.

9.2 Intake Procedures
Upon arrival, Class D individuals are processed according to the following non-negotiable steps:

• Verification: Identity confirmation through photographic log, fingerprint, and DNA assay.
• Registration: Assignment of Repository Identification Number (RIN), permanently replacing civil identification documents.
• Containment Placement: Immediate assignment to standardized confinement modules (SCMs), ensuring continuous compliance.
• Archival Entry: All measurements and intake data transmitted to the CB-6000 national database, with duplication in CRID’s on-site archive.

9.3 Containment Architecture
Subjects are housed in units designed for continuous monitoring and minimal discretionary movement. Each SCM includes:

• Adaptive restraint frameworks with automated calibration.
• Integrated biometric tracking (pressure, strain, thermal response).
• Direct linkage to the Repository Control Center for remote override.

Non-compliance events are rare, but when detected, correction is applied automatically through mechanical intervention systems.

9.4 Research Divisions
CRID maintains several divisions tasked with iterative improvement of compliance systems:

• Division Alpha – Cage Architecture:Development of multi-point restraint structures to prevent tampering and maximize subject stability.
• Division Beta – Endurance Metrics: Long-term studies on physiological adaptation to confinement, with particular focus on retention capacity.
• Division Gamma – Data Analytics: Cross-referencing biometric inadequacy with compliance efficiency. Predictive models are used to adjust legislative thresholds.
• Division Delta – Materials Testing: Evaluation of alloys, polymers, and composites for durability, corrosion resistance, and subject tolerability.

9.5 Oversight and Reporting
All research outcomes are compiled in the annual Compliance Integrity Report, submitted to the Oversight Council. Summaries are released publicly; detailed technical findings remain classified.

9.6 Legal Authority
Detention within CRID is indefinite and non-appealable. The facility operates outside conventional judicial review, its authority derived directly from the FLR/FLM Compliance Act. Subjects processed into CRID are legally reclassified as Research Assetsunder Section 9.4. This status is permanent and binding.

 

[Baztrachian]

I know this is parody but these days it won't be long before some dummy thinks it's a good idea.

 

[Husky_Embrace]

This is world building so far, which is fine. Though I have to ask, where is the story idea? Do you need an idea that involves this world? What is the goal you're trying to reach with the post?

On the world building:

What are they doing to nurture adequate development? Or is it just a ruse? The subjects seem to be just research material and nothing else.

 

[Rob_Royale]

This is world building so far, which is fine. Though I have to ask, where is the story idea?

Yes, please elaborate on the point of it all. I dig me some world building, but I'm left scratching my head.

 

[John_Q_Dough]

The story is Gynarchy taking over more and more of the government, individual cities fall under their control. Camps for “D” sized individuals pop up everywhere.

 

[Rob_Royale]

The story is Gynarchy taking over more and more of the government, individual cities fall under their control. Camps for “D” sized individuals pop up everywhere.

Ah, I getcha. Interesting. A big cock fetish story where the matriarchy divides the men my dick size. Smallest for such things as manual labor, and the largest into breeding camps, maybe?

 

[John_Q_Dough]

College classes are being offered that train the next generation of the Gynarchy

 

[John_Q_Dough]

Course Syllabus (Expanded)

Department of Behavioral Medicine & Applied Physiology
Course Title: Clinical Protocols in Male Restraint & Reconditioning
Course Code: BM-472
Semester: Fall Term (15 weeks)
Credit Hours: 3

Course Description
This course formalizes and institutionalizes the study of male restraint, reduction, and reconditioning. Using live volunteer subjects, students learn clinical techniques for documenting physiological change, monitoring psychological compliance, and applying progressive restraint technologies. Female students are strongly encouraged to recruit boyfriends, brothers, or other male contacts as their independent study participants, expanding the reach of the research and embedding the protocol in real-life contexts.
Weekly measurements, photographic documentation, and device adjustments provide the data backbone of this groundbreaking program. Academic and medical journals have hailed this initiative as a paradigm-shifting study, with potential applications in Female-Led Relationships (FLR), marital counseling, and broader social discipline models.

Learning Outcomes
By the end of the course, students will:

1. Administer staged reduction and restraint protocols under supervision.
2. Accurately record weekly measurements, photographic documentation, and compliance journals.
3. Analyze participant resistance and formulate individualized escalation plans.
4. Synthesize course material into independent treatment models applicable to FLR, behavioral psychology, and domestic therapy.

Weekly Breakdown
Week 1 – Orientation & Recruitment

• Lecture: Introduction to Clinical Restraint Studies
• Lab: Intake of volunteer subjects; baseline surveys, consent, and documentation protocols
• Independent Work: Female students begin recruitment of personal subjects; weekly logs initiated

Week 2 – Establishing Baselines

• Lecture: Measurement Standards & Photographic Protocols
• Lab: First measurement and photographic session with subjects (length, girth, fit)
• Independent Work: Student-subject dyads submit baseline reports

Week 3 – Device Familiarization

• Lecture: Types of Restraint Devices (CB-series, Holy Trainer, custom fit)
• Lab: Initial fitting of standard device (CB-6000 Short)
• Independent Work: Subjects record first week’s compliance log; discomfort diaries

Week 4 – Observation & Adjustment

• Lecture: Humiliation as Structured Therapy
• Lab: Student cohort observes live fitting sessions in small groups
• Independent Work: Photographic updates + text-message “check-ins” to supervising clinician

Week 5 – First Escalation

• Lecture: Downsizing Criteria & Psychological Impact
• Lab: Public adjustment session (OB/GYN suite, stirrups employed for restraint)
• Independent Work: Students record emotional responses of subjects; evidence logs submitted

Week 6 – Independent Reinforcement

• Lecture: Solitary Training and the Role of Journals
• Lab: No in-class meeting; participants continue wearing assigned device
• Independent Work: Daily photographic submissions + log entries

Week 7 – Collective Evaluation

• Lecture: Group Dynamics in Humiliation Studies
• Lab: Student cohort review sessions; peer critique of subject progress
• Independent Work: Anonymous student reports analyzing their subject’s resistance patterns

Week 8 – Supervisor Demonstrations

• Lecture: Error Correction as Pedagogy
• Lab: Senior supervisor conducts live re-sizing and humiliation demonstrations with full cohort in attendance
• Independent Work: Subjects required to write reflections on the experience (ghostwritten by students if necessary)

Week 9 – Midterm Case Reviews

• Lecture: Applied Psychology of Compliance
• Lab: Formal review of subject progress; student presentations with data visualizations
• Independent Work: Students prepare midterm dossier on their subject’s trajectory

Week 10 – Expanding Recruitment

• Lecture: Scaling the Program – From Case Study to Cohort
• Lab: New subjects introduced (secondary boyfriends, brothers, peers recruited mid-term)
• Independent Work: Students maintain logs for both primary and secondary subjects

Week 11 – Cross-Comparisons

• Lecture: Variation in Response to Protocols
• Lab: Comparative lab showcasing different device types and reduction stages across subjects
• Independent Work: Students create comparative analysis charts

Week 12 – Specialized Applications

• Lecture: Branching Applications – FLR, Counseling, Marital Dynamics
• Lab: Roundtable demonstration of FLR-adapted protocols
• Independent Work: Students conduct independent sessions focused on “domestic integration”

Week 13 – Full Clinical Review

• Lecture: Case Management in Large Cohorts
• Lab: Operatory suite demonstration with full audience, filming permitted for academic archive
• Independent Work: Subjects complete mandatory compliance contracts

Week 14 – Student-Led Clinics

• Lecture: Student Oversight & Teaching Assistant Models
• Lab: Students run their own live session, with faculty observing silently
• Independent Work: Subjects submit compliance logs directly to their student overseers

Week 15 – Final Review & Publication Prep

• Lecture: Future of Restraint Studies in Medicine & Society
• Lab: Final reduction and re-sizing, group presentation
• Independent Work: Students compile final reports formatted for journal submission

Assessment

• Lab Participation: 40%
• Independent Work (subject logs, photographs, compliance data): 30%
• Final Report & Presentation: 30%

 

[John_Q_Dough]

Peer reviewed published research paper on the class


Journal of Applied Behavioral Medicine

Volume 48, Issue 3, 2026

Restraint and Reconditioning: Early Outcomes from a Pilot Curriculum in Clinical Compliance Studies

Abstract
This paper presents preliminary findings from the Department of Behavioral Medicine’s innovative course,Clinical Protocols in Male Restraint & Reconditioning (BM-472). Conducted over a 15-week semester with a cohort of 42 female medical students and 58 volunteer male participants, the program has been recognized as the first structured integration of restraint-based compliance training into medical pedagogy.

Methods
Female students were encouraged to recruit personal contacts—partners, boyfriends, siblings, or peers—to serve as live case studies. Each subject underwent standardized baseline measurement (weekly anthropometric logs, photographic documentation) and progressive device-fitting protocols under controlled conditions. Weekly labs and independent work ensured adherence and allowed for both subjective and objective data collection.

Results

• Compliance Rates: By week six, 83% of subjects reported measurable behavioral adjustments, including reduced defiance, increased attentiveness, and heightened adherence to schedules set by their female overseers.
• Psychological Impact: Subjects consistently demonstrated accelerated acceptance when exposed to public adjustment sessions (weeks 5, 8, and 13). Humiliation in a structured, academic context proved to be a reliable catalyst for compliance.
• Recruitment Success: Independent study requirements expanded the participant pool significantly; 27 new subjects were introduced mid-semester, illustrating strong scalability.
• Resizing Protocols: Progressive reduction (“downsizing”) yielded observable shifts in posture, self-perception, and responsiveness, reinforcing the hypothesis that staged escalation fosters durable psychological change.

Discussion
The program represents a paradigm shift in medical and behavioral sciences. Beyond its immediate applications in compliance therapy, the curriculum suggests wider potential in Female-Led Relationship (FLR) dynamics, marital counseling, and domestic behavior modification. Early reports indicate that graduates of BM-472 leave with not only technical proficiency in restraint protocols but also a deeper awareness of gendered authority structures.

Conclusion
Restraint-based reconditioning, once dismissed as a fringe behavioral tool, is now being reframed as a legitimate clinical discipline with vast social implications. The deliberate pairing of academic rigor with lived practice situates this program at the forefront of behavioral medicine. Follow-up studies are already in development, with plans to replicate and expand the model across multiple institutions.

Keywords: Restraint studies, compliance protocols, behavioral modification, FLR, clinical pedagogy, humiliation dynamics