Gotta love a prez who will do what he wants reguardless...

linuxgeek

Rogue Scholar
Joined
Feb 1, 2004
Posts
32,718
src

Official: Bush to Name Bolton to U.N.

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Frustrated by Democrats, President Bush will circumvent the Senate on Monday and install embattled nominee John Bolton to be ambassador to the United Nations, a senior administration official said.

Bush has the power to fill vacancies without Senate approval while Congress is in recess. Under the Constitution, a recess appointment during the lawmakers' August break would last until the next session of Congress, which begins in January 2007.

In advance of Bush's announcement, Democrats said Bolton would start his new job on the wrong foot in a recess appointment.

"He's damaged goods. This is a person who lacks credibility," Sen. Christopher Dodd of Connecticut, a senior Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said on "Fox News Sunday." Bush, he said, should think again before using a recess appointment to place Bolton at the United Nations while the Senate is on its traditional August break.

But Republicans appearing on Sunday's news shows said Bolton is the man the White House wants and he's the right person to represent the United States at the world body.

Bolton's appointment ends a five-month impasse between the administration and Senate Democrats.

The battle grabbed headlines last spring amid accusations that Bolton abused subordinates and twisted intelligence to shape his conservative ideology, and as White House and GOP leadership efforts to ram the nomination through the Senate fell short.

In recent weeks, it faded into the background as the Senate prepared to begin a nomination battle over John Roberts, the federal appeals judge that Bush chose to replace the retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor at the Supreme Court.

At Bolton's April confirmation hearing, Democrats raised additional questions about his demeanor and attitude toward lower-level government officials. Those questions came to dominate Bolton's confirmation battle, growing into numerous allegations that he had abused underlings or tried to browbeat intelligence analysts whose views differed from his own.

Despite lengthy investigations, it was never clear that Bolton did anything improper. Witnesses told the committee that Bolton lost his temper, tried to engineer the ouster of at least two intelligence analysts and otherwise threw his weight around. But Democrats were never able to establish that his actions crossed the line to out-and-out harassment or improper intimidation.

Separately, Democrats and the White House deadlocked over Bolton's acknowledged request for names of U.S officials whose communications were secretly picked up by the National Security Agency. Democrats said the material might show that Bolton conducted a witch hunt for analysts or others who disagreed with him.

The top Republican and Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee received a limited briefing on the contents of the messages Bolton saw, but were not told the names.

Democrats said that was not good enough, but later offered a compromise. After much back and forth, with the White House claiming Democrats had moved the goal posts, no other senator saw any of the material.

Last week, the administration telegraphed Bush's intention to put Bolton on the job.

White House press secretary Scott McClellan said the vacancy needed to be filled before the U.N. General Assembly's annual meeting in mid-September. Former Sen. John Danforth left the post in January.

In the face of objections from most Democrats and at least one Republican, Bush has steadfastly refused to withdraw Bolton's nomination - even after the Foreign Relations Committee sent it to the full Senate without the customary recommendation to approve it.

Though the debate over Bolton had largely faded from the headlines, critics raised fresh concerns this week when it surfaced that Bolton had neglected to tell Congress that he had been interviewed in 2003 in a government investigation into faulty prewar intelligence on Iraq.

In a letter released Friday, 35 Democratic senators and one independent, Sen. Jim Jeffords of Vermont, urged Bush not to give Bolton a recess appointment.

"There's just too much unanswered about Bolton, and I think the president would make a truly serious mistake if he makes a recess appointment," Sen. Joseph Biden of Delaware, the top Democrat on the Foreign Relations Committee, said in an interview.
 
Check the Constitution, it's his prerogative.......like Kennedy's, Johnson's, Nixon's, Carter's, Reagan's, Clinton's, Bush's....

"The sky is falling! The sky is falling! Bock-Bock!" :D
 
Obviously his perogative or he wouldn't have the power to do it. Just a shame the opinion of Congress means so little to him when it contradicts what he wants to have happen.
 
Last edited:
Bush Jr. has that snotty, cocky attitude which I find internationally embarassing. Even if he was right about something or whatever, I wouldn't listen. He just makes my skin crawl and feel sorry for his daughters. Could you imagine having a father like that?
 
gypsywitch said:
Bush Jr. has that snotty, cocky attitude which I find internationally embarassing. Even if he was right about something or whatever, I wouldn't listen. He just makes my skin crawl and feel sorry for his daughters. Could you imagine having a father like that?

I'd probably become a boozed-up cokewhore.
 
gypsywitch said:
Bush Jr. has that snotty, cocky attitude which I find internationally embarassing. Even if he was right about something or whatever, I wouldn't listen. He just makes my skin crawl and feel sorry for his daughters. Could you imagine having a father like that?


I think his daughters fit right in living up or down to his expectations.
 
The dam has too many leaks at once and they can't plug them fast enough.

Bolton is one of the key figures linking the past and present in several controversial matters.

What a photo that was with GWB-Bolton-Rice standing together there in defiance of the American people. They look on us with self-righteous contempt.
 
If you're the king.

GWB said essentially the same thing about being a dictator.

He also kissed his 'legacy' goodbye by doing this and tipped his hand as to damage control being more important.

<clip>

There is also the intriguing relationship between John Bolton, the regime’s stymied appointee to the UN, and Judith Miller, the New York Times correspondent sent to jail for contempt in refusing to divulge her sources on Plame even for a story she never wrote. Bolton’s close relationship to Miller, in which many suspect the right-wing lobbyist handed the reporter much of the fraudulent accounts of Iraqi weaponry that ended up on the front page of the Times, may well have encompassed as well the passing of information from the INR memo on Plame, which Bolton saw before Powell or even Rice.

<clip>

http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0728-25.htm
 
Last edited:
Bolton will be internationally shunned and pigeonholed at the UN.

The rest of the world sees what's happening here.
 
He'll be great at generating profits for a select few and that's the real reason he's there.

As he teams up with Wolfie at the IMF, profits and human suffering will both reach record levels.
 
ruminator said:
He'll be great at generating profits for a select few and that's the real reason he's there.

As he teams up with Wolfie at the IMF, profits and human suffering will both reach record levels.

I disagree. I think he's there because of this administration's desire to help change the UN from the ineffectual organization it has become into a more meaningful organization.

The UN hasn't done a lot other than involving itself in scandals and posturing on the crisis in the Sudan.
 
cuninglinguist61 said:
Isn't hubris just adorable in a president, especially when he walks like John Wayne ?

That's just the haemorroids....
 
zipman said:
I disagree. I think he's there because of this administration's desire to help change the UN from the ineffectual organization it has become into a more meaningful organization.

The UN hasn't done a lot other than involving itself in scandals and posturing on the crisis in the Sudan.

What course of action do you see this administration taking to guide the UN to effective change in situations like the crisis in Sudan?
 
ruminator said:
What course of action do you see this administration taking to guide the UN to effective change in situations like the crisis in Sudan?

I think appointing Bolton was the first step as he will be much more confrontational than his predecessors.
 
zipman said:
I disagree. I think he's there because of this administration's desire to help change the UN from the ineffectual organization it has become into a more meaningful organization.

The UN hasn't done a lot other than involving itself in scandals and posturing on the crisis in the Sudan.

Wouldn't that have more to do with the current leader of the UN and the example he puts forth?
 
zipman said:
I think appointing Bolton was the first step as he will be much more confrontational than his predecessors.

The only thing this guarrantees is that the goals and policies of the neoconservatives in control will come first and foremost.

If you support the WHIG foreign policy then Bolton is the man.

I don't agree with them.
 
linuxgeek said:
Wouldn't that have more to do with the current leader of the UN and the example he puts forth?

It all still comes down to the global economy of profits as to what governs the UN.

One of the main sticking points is the ICC, it seems.
 
linuxgeek said:
Wouldn't that have more to do with the current leader of the UN and the example he puts forth?

Kofi Annan is a huge part of the problem but I think the problem goes way beyond him to the very way the UN operates.
 
ruminator said:
The only thing this guarrantees is that the goals and policies of the neoconservatives in control will come first and foremost.

If you support the WHIG foreign policy then Bolton is the man.

I don't agree with them.

I disagree and I'm not a Bush supporter.

I think the real issue isn't what is a neoconservative agenda and what is a liberal agenda but what agenda is best for America.

Personally I think the UN has failed and not been held to task over the last few years at the barest minimum. I think Sudan being on the human rights commission is a perfect example.

I don't see a downside to having a more confrontational stance on the UN right now.
 
Back
Top