Good News: Obama Wants To Share U.S. Missile Defense Secrets With . . . Russia…

[busybody..]

Get rid of this

NIGGER

Before he destroys our

Great country once and for all!​

Good News: Obama Wants To Share U.S. Missile Defense Secrets With . . . Russia…




Via Washington Times:


President Obama signaled Congress this week that he is prepared to share U.S. missile defense secrets with Russia.

In the president’s signing statement issued Saturday in passing into law the fiscal 2012 defense authorization bill, Mr. Obama said restrictions aimed at protecting top-secret technical data on U.S. Standard Missile-3 velocity burnout parameters might impinge on his constitutional foreign policy authority.

As first disclosed in this space several weeks ago, U.S. officials are planning to provide Moscow with the SM-3 data, despite reservations from security officials who say that doing so could compromise the effectiveness of the system by allowing Russian weapons technicians to counter the missile. The weapons are considered some of the most effective high-speed interceptors in the U.S. missile defense arsenal.

There are also concerns that Russia could share the secret data with China and rogue states such as Iran and North Korea to help their missile programs defeat U.S. missile defenses.

Officials from the State Department and Missile Defense Agency have discussed the idea of providing the SM-3 data to the Russians as part of the so-far fruitless missile-defense talks with Moscow, headed in part of by Undersecretary of State Ellen Tauscher, who defense officials say is a critic of U.S. missile defenses.

Their thinking is that if the Russians know the technical data, it will help allay Moscow’s fears that the planned missile defenses in Europe would be used against Russian ICBMs. Officials said current SM-3s are not fast enough to catch long-range Russian missiles, but a future variant may have some anti-ICBM capabilities.

 

[unregistered]

 

[busybody..]

yes

 

[koalabear]

Might as well share with them,China already has them.

 

[busybody..]

why should they spend money

why should WE spend money

with spies and counter spies


JUST GIVE IT TO EM

 

[busybody..]

Obama Administration Plans to Give Nuclear Secrets to Russia


Can anyone who voted for Obama honestly say they are surprised to find him pulling literally treasonous stunts like this?


President Obama signaled Congress this week that he is prepared to share U.S. missile defense secrets with Russia.

In the president’s signing statement issued Saturday in passing into law the fiscal 2012 defense authorization bill, Mr. Obama said restrictions aimed at protecting top-secret technical data on U.S. Standard Missile-3 velocity burnout parameters might impinge on his constitutional foreign policy authority.

As first disclosed in this space several weeks ago, U.S. officials are planning to provide Moscow with the SM-3 data, despite reservations from security officials who say that doing so could compromise the effectiveness of the system by allowing Russian weapons technicians to counter the missile. The weapons are considered some of the most effective high-speed interceptors in the U.S. missile defense arsenal.

There are also concerns that Russia could share the secret data with China and rogue states such as Iran and North Korea to help their missile programs defeat U.S. missile defenses.

Officials from the State Department and Missile Defense Agency have discussed the idea of providing the SM-3 data to the Russians as part of the so-far fruitless missile-defense talks with Moscow, headed in part of by Undersecretary of State Ellen Tauscher, who defense officials say is a critic of U.S. missile defenses.

Liberal ideologues have hated the idea of American missile defenses since Reagan introduced “Star Wars.” Under Obama, they have a chance to disable them.

Thankfully we have separation of powers in America, to protect against one branch of government going rogue:


Section 1227 of the defense law prohibits spending any funds that would be used to give Russian officials access to sensitive missile-defense technology, as part of a cooperation agreement without first sending Congress a report identifying the specific secrets, how they would be used and steps to protect the data from compromise.

The president also must certify to Congress that Russia will not share the secrets with other states and that it will not help Russia “to develop countermeasures” to U.S. defenses.

However, the Manchurian Moonbat once again sneers at the concept of Congress limiting his power.


Mr. Obama said in the signing statement that he would treat the legal restrictions as “non-binding.”

“While my administration intends to keep the Congress fully informed of the status of U.S. efforts to cooperate with the Russian Federation on ballistic missile defense, my administration will also interpret and implement section 1244 in a manner that does not interfere with the president’s constitutional authority to conduct foreign affairs and avoids the undue disclosure of sensitive diplomatic communications,” Mr. Obama said, incorrectly identifying the section of the law containing the restrictions.

The same fifth column Mussolini wannabe who contemptuously dismisses the Constitutional requirement that his disturbing appointment of Richard Cordray to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau receive Senate confirmation has the nerve to proclaim that the Constitution gives him the right to provide our missile defense secrets to rival nuclear powers, laws passed by Congress be damned.

At least his foreign policy is consistent. Obama has already treacherously withdrawn promised antiballistic defenses from our loyal allies Poland and the Czech Republic on behalf of Russia.

If the establishment media were not effectively a branch of the Obama Administration, stories like this would lead off every newscast, and the concept of this punk being reelected in a free and fair election would be laughable. As it is, the election promises to be anything but free and fair.

 

[Longtallhubby]

Hey, I usually refrain from dabbling in the GB, but I think it's worth mentioning that Reagan and Weinberger were the first to suggest sharing missile defense technology with our enemies as part of the "MAD" or "mutual assured destruction" theory.

"When Gorbachev pointed out that a missile shield would enable the United States to launch a first strike with impunity, Reagan, who was amazed that anyone would think the United States capable of such a thing, offered to share SDI technology with the Soviets."

Read more: Ronald reagan - Cold Warriors http://www.americanforeignrelations.com/A-D/Cold-Warriors-Ronald-reagan.html#b#ixzz1icbhwuhT​

This is documented in a lot of other writings at the time. Of course some arm control analysts believed and still believe that a missile defense shield provides and incentive for further escalation rather than an incentive to disarm. But Reagan and his advisors believed that if everyone could defend from nuclear attack it made it pointless to build more missiles.

I frankly don't have a position either way, just wanted to point out that sharing technology with the Russians is a 25-year-old question. It's funny that it still hasn't been resolved.

 

[busybody..]

Hey, I usually refrain from dabbling in the GB, but I think it's worth mentioning that Reagan and Weinberger were the first to suggest sharing missile defense technology with our enemies as part of the "MAD" or "mutual assured destruction" theory.

.

I agree

I trusted RR to do whats best for the US

I trust Obama to do whats best for everyone BUT the US

 

[GracefullyYours]

I snipped BusyBody's long-ass article

O ne
B ig
A ss
M istake
A merica!

He needs to fucking grow a pair.

 

[busybody..]

she took it


http://www.ihatethemedia.com/wp-content/uploads/michelle-obama-bulge1.jpg

 

[busybody..]

 

[miles]

More mental illness...yawn.

 

[terencesmum]

Hey, I usually refrain from dabbling in the GB, but I think it's worth mentioning that Reagan and Weinberger were the first to suggest sharing missile defense technology with our enemies as part of the "MAD" or "mutual assured destruction" theory.

"When Gorbachev pointed out that a missile shield would enable the United States to launch a first strike with impunity, Reagan, who was amazed that anyone would think the United States capable of such a thing, offered to share SDI technology with the Soviets."

Read more: Ronald reagan - Cold Warriors http://www.americanforeignrelations.com/A-D/Cold-Warriors-Ronald-reagan.html#b#ixzz1icbhwuhT​

This is documented in a lot of other writings at the time. Of course some arm control analysts believed and still believe that a missile defense shield provides and incentive for further escalation rather than an incentive to disarm. But Reagan and his advisors believed that if everyone could defend from nuclear attack it made it pointless to build more missiles.

I frankly don't have a position either way, just wanted to point out that sharing technology with the Russians is a 25-year-old question. It's funny that it still hasn't been resolved.

Yeah, I agree with you.http://www.demama.info/g.php

 

[badbabysitter]

so when Reagen does this.. its awesome

when Obama does it.. it's bad

you guys crack me up

 

[busybody..]

yes,


cause RR was an AMERICAN who cared

Obama isnt and doesnt!

 

[busybody..]

so when Reagen does this.. its awesome

when Obama does it.. it's bad

you guys crack me up

when your NIGGER does shit, its all OK

when Bush did it, you NIGGERS went APE shit!


so take your BEASTLY FAG agenda and shove it

 

[busybody..]

Russia?

and

Not

China?

Why does Obama hate people who dont look like us?

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

http://pajamasmedia.com/tatler/files/2011/04/obama-wide-grin80.jpg
That wasn't me that gave drone technology to Iran!

 

[badbabysitter]

when your NIGGER does shit, its all OK

when Bush did it, you NIGGERS went APE shit!


so take your BEASTLY FAG agenda and shove it

ahhhh deflection.. someone pointed out the huge gaping hole in this arguement.. so you have to change the subject


still... I think you need to make a thread giving Reagen shit about this

 

[busybody..]

ahhhh deflection.. someone pointed out the huge gaping hole in this arguement.. so you have to change the subject


still... I think you need to make a thread giving Reagen shit about this

I made it clear

What RR did was OK, cause he had teh US's interest at heart and I TRUSTED HIM

NIGGER IS A MUSLIM ANTI AMERICAN!

 

[badbabysitter]

I made it clear

What RR did was OK, cause he had teh US's interest at heart and I TRUSTED HIM

NIGGER IS A MUSLIM ANTI AMERICAN!

ahhh..so you admit this thread was just hypocritical hyperbole


thanks

 

[busybody..]

I admit I dont for ONE second believe NIGGER does anything that BENEFITS my country

Only does things that HARMS MY COUNTRY!