Good luck, kid. I'm rooting for you...

RoryN

You're screwed.
Joined
Apr 8, 2003
Posts
60,531
...but we all know nothing's gonna happen. :rolleyes:

Atheist soldier sues Army for 'unconstitutional' discrimination

By Randi Kaye

KANSAS CITY, Kansas (CNN) -- Army Spc. Jeremy Hall was raised Baptist.

Army Spc. Jeremy Hall, who was raised Baptist but is now an atheist, says the military violated his religious freedom.

1 of 2 Like many Christians, he said grace before dinner and read the Bible before bed. Four years ago when he was deployed to Iraq, he packed his Bible so he would feel closer to God.

He served two tours of duty in Iraq and has a near perfect record. But somewhere between the tours, something changed. Hall, now 23, said he no longer believes in God, fate, luck or anything supernatural.

Hall said he met some atheists who suggested he read the Bible again. After doing so, he said he had so many unanswered questions that he decided to become an atheist.

His sudden lack of faith, he said, cost him his military career and put his life at risk. Hall said his life was threatened by other troops and the military assigned a full-time bodyguard to protect him out of fear for his safety.

In March, Hall filed a federal lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Defense and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, among others. In the suit, Hall claims his rights to religious freedom under the First Amendment were violated and suggests that the United States military has become a Christian organization.

"I think it's utterly and totally wrong. Unconstitutional," Hall said.

Hall said there is a pattern of discrimination against non-Christians in the military.

Two years ago on Thanksgiving Day, after refusing to pray at his table, Hall said he was told to go sit somewhere else. In another incident, when he was nearly killed during an attack on his Humvee, he said another soldier asked him, "Do you believe in Jesus now?"

Hall isn't seeking compensation in his lawsuit -- just the guarantee of religious freedom in the military. Eventually, Hall was sent home early from Iraq and later returned to Fort Riley in Junction City, Kansas, to complete his tour of duty.

He also said he missed out on promotions because he is an atheist.

"I was told because I can't put my personal beliefs aside and pray with troops I wouldn't make a good leader," Hall said.

Michael Weinstein, a retired senior Air Force officer and founder of the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, is suing along with Hall. Weinstein said he's been contacted by more than 8,000 members of the military, almost all of them complaining of pressure to embrace evangelical Christianity.

"Our Pentagon, our Pentacostalgon, is refusing to realize that when you put the uniform on, there's only one religious faith: patriotism," Weinstein said.

Religious discrimination is a violation of the First Amendment and is also against military policy. The Pentagon refused to discuss specifics of Hall's case -- citing the litigation. But Deputy Undersecretary Bill Carr said complaints of evangelizing are "relatively rare." He also said the Pentagon is not pushing one faith among troops.

"If an atheist chose to follow their convictions, absolutely that's acceptable," said Carr. "And that's a point of religious accommodation in department policy, one may hold whatever faith, or may hold no faith."

Weinstein said he doesn't buy it and points to a promotional video by a group called Christian Embassy. The video, which shows U.S. generals in uniform, was shot inside the Pentagon. The generals were subsequently reprimanded.

Another group, the Officers' Christian Fellowship, has representatives on nearly all military bases worldwide. Its vision, which is spelled out on the organization's Web site, reads, "A spiritually transformed military, with ambassadors for Christ in uniform empowered by the Holy Spirit."

Weinstein has a different interpretation.

"Their purpose is to have Christian officers exercise Biblical leadership to raise up a godly army," he says.

But Carr said the military's position is clear.

"Proselytizing or advancing a religious conviction is not what the nation would have us do and it's not what the military does," Carr said.

The U.S. Justice Department is expected to respond to Hall's lawsuit this week. In the meantime, he continues to work in the military police unit at Fort Riley and plans to leave as soon as his tour of duty expires next year.

http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/07/08/atheist.soldier/index.html
 
I'll pray for him. Oh right...

He should cross as many fingers as is humanly possible. Suit will probably go nowhere.
 
LET'S MAKE PEACE THE WAY WE DID IN STANLEYVILLE AND SAIGON

http://video.google.com/videoplay?d...tian+soldiers&ei=oz90SMf9C5CEqgO_zoyQCw&hl=en

Onward, Christian soldiers,
Marching as to war.
With the cross of Jesus
Going on before!
Christ, the royal Master,
Leads against the foe;
Forward into battle,
See His banner go!

Onward, Christian soldiers,
Marching as to war.
With the cross of Jesus
Going on before!

At the sign of triumph
Satan's host dost flee;
On, then, Christian soldiers,
On to victory!
Hell's foundations quiver
At the shout of praise;
Brothers, lift your voices,
Loud your anthems raise!

Onward, Christian soldiers,
Marching as to war.
With the cross of Jesus
Going on before!

Like a mighty army
Moves the church of God;
Brothers, we are treading
Where the saints have trod;
We are not divided;
All one body we,
One in hope and doctrine,
One in charity.

Onward, Christian soldiers,
Marching as to war.
With the cross of Jesus
Going on before!

Onward, then ye people,
Join our happy throng,
Blend with ours your voices
In the triumph song;
Glory, laud, and honor,
Unto Christ the King:
This thro' countless ages
Men and angels sing.

Onward, Christian soldiers,
Marching as to war.
With the cross of Jesus
Going on before!
 
Our enlightened leadership establishes the acceptability of this crap.

Should the unlikeliest occur and federal court finds in his favor... the Supremes will move it to the front of the line and reverse it asap.
 
Our enlightened leadership establishes the acceptability of this crap.

Should the unlikeliest occur and federal court finds in his favor... the Supremes will move it to the front of the line and reverse it asap.

He will prevail if he can show that it was an organized effort to proselytize. That would, indeed, violate the First Amendment Establishment Clause. No way for The Supremes to get around that. If he wins at trial, it will be affirmed on appeal and the Supreme Court will not grant cert.

I have spoken.
 
There is a general trend in America towards atheism. It fluctuates every few years, but is definitely moving that direction.

The military will be one of the last holdouts, remaining mostly religious even after all the pious politicians are retired.
 
He will prevail if he can show that it was an organized effort to proselytize. That would, indeed, violate the First Amendment Establishment Clause. No way for The Supremes to get around that. If he wins at trial, it will be affirmed on appeal and the Supreme Court will not grant cert.

I have spoken.

Maybe you could just forward that to Counsel and everyone can save themselves a lot of trouble.

My guess is that the subjectivity will be in defining "organized effort." Was there hierarchical encouragement of this action? Is it enough to know it's going on and fail to intervene? The Supremes will support the reigning ideology of the day -- not because it's the reigning ideology... but because it is a reflection of the power dynamic that selected them.
 
Another underhanded attempt to force athiesm on society and push religious faith further into the closet or private homes. Nothing new with this lawsuit, its part of an ongoing organized strategy to make atheism the de facto state religion and embarrass people with religious believe into the closet. Lets hope the clown gets stuck to pay court costs, though I'm afraid he'll probably win and everybody else will have to pretend they are atheists too to avoid "offending" him.
 
Another underhanded attempt to force athiesm on society and push religious faith further into the closet or private homes. Nothing new with this lawsuit, its part of an ongoing organized strategy to make atheism the de facto state religion and embarrass people with religious believe into the closet. Lets hope the clown gets stuck to pay court costs, though I'm afraid he'll probably win and everybody else will have to pretend they are atheists too to avoid "offending" him.

I was actually going to address this post.. But I thought better of it and have decided to call you a complete moron instead.
 
Another underhanded attempt to force athiesm on society and push religious faith further into the closet or private homes.

Wrong. Your comments stink of intolerance and ignorance, as usual.

But it's a good sign when something offends you.
 
There is a general trend in America towards atheism. It fluctuates every few years, but is definitely moving that direction.

Not being a member of a church or other religious body is not the same as atheism. Most people have no problem with other people mentioning their religious faith. Most people think its cool if somebody wants to pray before a meal or whatever. Who cares? Why the intolerance against nice well meaning religious folks? I wasn't raised religious, but I've never understood the hate and intolerance against them. :confused:
 
Another underhanded attempt to force athiesm on society and push religious faith further into the closet or private homes. Nothing new with this lawsuit, its part of an ongoing organized strategy to make atheism the de facto state religion and embarrass people with religious believe into the closet. Lets hope the clown gets stuck to pay court costs, though I'm afraid he'll probably win and everybody else will have to pretend they are atheists too to avoid "offending" him.

You just can't make up stuff like this. Classically stupid.
 
huh...well I guess there really are Atheists in foxholes afterall.
 
Always were. That was just a cute saying from WWII a lot of "believers" wanted to think was true.

It's not.

It alludes to the idea that when you're facing death almost everyone will suddenly start to pray. It's true in a general sense, totally untrue in the literal.
 
Not being a member of a church or other religious body is not the same as atheism. Most people have no problem with other people mentioning their religious faith. Most people think its cool if somebody wants to pray before a meal or whatever. Who cares? Why the intolerance against nice well meaning religious folks? I wasn't raised religious, but I've never understood the hate and intolerance against them. :confused:

I might be confusing your intent, but I think the point at issue here was that the religious were being intolerant of the nonreligious.
 
Not being a member of a church or other religious body is not the same as atheism. Most people have no problem with other people mentioning their religious faith. Most people think its cool if somebody wants to pray before a meal or whatever. Who cares? Why the intolerance against nice well meaning religious folks? I wasn't raised religious, but I've never understood the hate and intolerance against them. :confused:

He should have the right not to participate in prayer without fear of death threats from his fellow soldiers, wouldn't you agree?

The issue is not his intolerance of their faith, but rather the intolerance of his lack of faith.
 
Which is bullshit. In every sense of the idea.

Not in the way that the saying was meant originally. People want to take it and use it to show religion in the military and that's just dumb but it came out of those little deals people make to themselves or whoever when in dire straits or how people will use God's name in a bad situation.
Almost everyone does something along those lines even if it's not so much religous in nature when faced with something like combat.
What people do and say when ordered into combat is not always consistent with what they do and say before and after.
 
Back
Top