Gohmert introduces resolution that would ban the Democratic Party

[FGB]

Gohmert introduces resolution that would ban the Democratic Party.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=891pcEw-icA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jzgzhLmxVTk

 

[FGB]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCvI1Po832w

 

[Lazaran]

.
Gohmert Pile of shit???

 

[FGB]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZhVKTCz6RPM

 

[YDB95]

Looks like the title of "Dumbest member of Congress" isn't changing hands anytime soon.

 

[jaF0]

Hmmm....

 

[Fuzzy1975]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/powe...21472a-0271-11eb-a2db-417cddf4816a_story.html

 

[FGB]

Oh.

I enjoyed the fuck out of that!

They should change to the Racist party.

At least they would be more honest.

(Fat chance!)

No wonder Pelosi has been fucked up lately!

I bet she almost stroked out!

 

[butters]

hmmn, let's see:

a political party that had racist roots has managed to move on over the centuries to renounce the things now abhorrent to most decent people, working hard to gain equality for everyone of all gender/age/skin colour/geographical location/educational level, religious persuasion...

compared to a party that openly embraces racism, sexism, wealth inequality, restriction of voter rights, restriction of access to decent health care, the inequality of wage/education structures, tries to force christian religious mores above other religions, and sells out the american public during a pandemic through dangerous and deliberate misinformation and denial?

gosh, such a hard choice

 

[FescueFan]

hmmn, let's see:

a political party that had racist roots has managed to move on over the centuries to renounce the things now abhorrent to most decent people, working hard to gain equality for everyone of all gender/age/skin colour/geographical location/educational level, religious persuasion...

compared to a party that openly embraces racism, sexism, wealth inequality, restriction of voter rights, restriction of access to decent health care, the inequality of wage/education structures, tries to force christian religious mores above other religions, and sells out the american public during a pandemic through dangerous and deliberate misinformation and denial?

gosh, such a hard choice

Unless they're white males....then they have to pay for the sins of their race and sex.

Or Asian or Jewish then you have to discriminate against them to create more equal or proportional outcomes in universities and professions.

But that's different because reasons.

 

[doowdniw]

I don't mind him being in the minority in congress, if it will keep him off the bench in the state.

 

[Wrong Element]

Heh. As I've said before, as a former resident of TX-1, Gohmert is a perfect fit for that district.

 

[Aglaopheme]

These are from months ago...

 

[YDB95]

hmmn, let's see:

a political party that had racist roots has managed to move on over the centuries to renounce the things now abhorrent to most decent people, working hard to gain equality for everyone of all gender/age/skin colour/geographical location/educational level, religious persuasion...

compared to a party that openly embraces racism, sexism, wealth inequality, restriction of voter rights, restriction of access to decent health care, the inequality of wage/education structures, tries to force christian religious mores above other religions, and sells out the american public during a pandemic through dangerous and deliberate misinformation and denial?

gosh, such a hard choice

Quiet, you! Under the Dumpington Doctrine, history officially ended in 1964 and nothing after that counts except presidential elections when Republicans won.