gloryhole

Netzach said:
Do they still even have those anymore?

Yes -they still exist. I know of them in Ohio, NY, Indiana, Michigan. They are real for sure!

lapp
 
Ohio you say...Hmmm, must be all those repressed, conservative republicans- LOL
 
PrimalGirl said:
Ohio you say...Hmmm, must be all those repressed, conservative republicans- LOL

Repression spawns KINK!! ;)

lapp
 
are there actually HETEROsexual gloryholes still in existence? i'd love to find one around here, that's long been a fantasy of mine, serving for a night at a seedy gloryhole having to suck strange cock after strange cock.
 
I know they still exist in Seattle and I imagine they are in most cities still. Think they are more on the down low in the community due to the risk factor. But I am with Neon on the safer sex issue, gloryholes from the past are just instances of russian roulette with your health status.


~kierae :rose:
 
i'm with, mis. Whatever floats your boat...but really yucky, IMO. A good way to get an STD.
 
myinnerslut said:
i keep thinking about guys getting splinters....


LMBO!! never considered that angle before, but then that could easily be prevented by the use of a liner, or a non-wooden door. i've seen it done at parties (not what i consider to be "true" gloryholes, but i digress) with heavy curtains, sealed shut in all but the necessary spots.
 
ownedsubgal said:
why yucky?
I certainly don't think it's yucky per se. It's just the STD angle I worry about - re: oral, harder to catch HIV, but easy for syphilis, herpes I, and gonorrhea of the throat - condoms would be protective - why I wrote "safer sex" - but i suspect that this isn't custom with glory holes, particularly not with oral... can definitely see the attraction of fantasy, though. :catgrin:
 
neonflux said:
can definitely see the attraction of fantasy, though. :catgrin:
Are they all gone from the top floor of PE?


stories, I could tell stories,
and give dates and places...
no names - never got a name - never left mine...
I guess they had faces - I expect they did anyhow....

:p :D
 
Shankara20 said:
Are they all gone from the top floor of PE?


stories, I could tell stories,
and give dates and places...
no names - never got a name - never left mine...
I guess they had faces - I expect they did anyhow....

:p :D
Your back! Glad that your computer is fixed! *claps while jumping up and down* I think M told me that they still had them before the renovation the floor is currently undergoing. Question: should I assume that condoms aren't used for oral sex? What about anal? :) Neon
 
neonflux said:
Your back! Glad that your computer is fixed! *claps while jumping up and down* I think M told me that they still had them before the renovation the floor is currently undergoing. Question: should I assume that condoms aren't used for oral sex? What about anal? :) Neon
anal= condoms + always

oral = err, aaa, what was the question again? :eek:

at that time I was not a roll model - just one lucky cock-sucker... times for me have changed I am safe sex player now, well, would be if opportunity ever knocked ;)

imposed celibacy = safe sex *sigh*


still not back on-line 100% - must spend more time working on equipment and not playing here :mad:
 
Shankara20 said:
anal= condoms + always

oral = err, aaa, what was the question again? :eek:
LOL. I know that the oral thing is up for grabs. Don't tend to use latex for oral on partners of either gender, but there is something about the complete anonymity of a glory hole that would make me feel more cautious... (Plus, I assume that it's much harder under those conditions to make a real examination of the receiver.)

Bummer on the computer. :(

Neon :catgrin:
 
neonflux said:
LOL. I know that the oral thing is up for grabs. Don't tend to use latex for oral on partners of either gender, but there is something about the complete anonymity of a glory hole that would make me feel more cautious... (Plus, I assume that it's much harder under those conditions to make a real examination of the receiver.)

Bummer on the computer. :(

Neon :catgrin:
I used that ambiguity about oral to justify some risky oral behavior at Steamworks in Oakland - some of those gloryhole rooms were so dark there is no way to exam the cock at face level let alone the 5 cocks at face level to choose from - :eek: :p -

Both SW and PE were set up with a platform so the owner of the cock to be sucked was higher then the owner of the mouth doing the sucking = hard cock at mouth level :p
and the hole was elongated up and down to accommodate men of many heights. Talk about service!
 
neonflux said:
LOL. I know that the oral thing is up for grabs. Don't tend to use latex for oral on partners of either gender, but there is something about the complete anonymity of a glory hole that would make me feel more cautious... (Plus, I assume that it's much harder under those conditions to make a real examination of the receiver.)

Bummer on the computer. :(

Neon :catgrin:


for me a great part of the appeal is in the danger and risks involved. if condoms were used, if the men were all pre-screened to make sure there were no psychos and crazies, if everything were perfectly safe and cozy, then what the heck would be the point? it might as well be a medical exam.
 
PrimalGirl said:
Ohio you say...Hmmm, must be all those repressed, conservative republicans- LOL

That's funny, I never thought of myself as repressed... :rolleyes:
 
miss you osg...email me sometime if you're allowed. *hugs*

Now, as for glory holes:
www.squirt.org
www.cruisingforsex.com

They are mostly gay-oriented websites, but it's a good place to find holes in the wall, and some are in locations a woman could go. I don't think guys check to see who's sucking on the other side, as long as they're getting their cocks sucked.
 
Back
Top