Giving Head to the uncircumcised man...

sharynat

Virgin
Joined
Aug 19, 2013
Posts
8
I used to be so good at doing this. Now I meet a man who is uncircumcised, a first for me. As I go down on him, he gets squeamish. He is sensitive to my oral touch. He wants to work on it. Any tips??
 
I'm curious as well, I have never seen an uncircumsized penis in real life. Do you have to pull the skin down or does it pull back when hard? Sounds like a stupid question but everyone penis I have ever seen has been circumcised and it never occurred to me that there may be a difference. I might bump into one someday so I should be prepared ;)
 
That's funny because I've actually never been with a circumcised guy in real life and had the same curiosities about circumcised penises... do you always need some kind of lube? Can you really always see the head? etc, etc. Now here's what I know about head: It obviously depends on your guy and what he likes personally, but I try to hold his penis about 3/4 of the way up and not pull his foreskin down too far... not past the head (unless he tells you too). I've found that sucking directly on the head is too much for a lot of uncircumcised guys, so I hold onto his penis with my hand, going up and down, slowly pulling his foreskin with me and adding my mouth on top so that its all one fluid motion. Once you feel your guy out and see if hes enjoying your new moves, maybe get a little bit more creative with your sucking and suck his foreskin into your mouth lightly... my honey really likes it ;) If the foreskin thing grosses you out a bit, there's nothing wrong with asking him to take a shower and clean it (or ya know.... soap it up for him ;)). In my experience, most guys are willing to do just about anything to get head so they're happy to get in the shower and get all clean for you. Easiest way is to communicate! Make sure he lets you know if its feeling good for him. Enjoy ;)
 
That's funny because I've actually never been with a circumcised guy in real life and had the same curiosities about circumcised penises... do you always need some kind of lube? Can you really always see the head? etc, etc. Now here's what I know about head: It obviously depends on your guy and what he likes personally, but I try to hold his penis about 3/4 of the way up and not pull his foreskin down too far... not past the head (unless he tells you too). I've found that sucking directly on the head is too much for a lot of uncircumcised guys, so I hold onto his penis with my hand, going up and down, slowly pulling his foreskin with me and adding my mouth on top so that its all one fluid motion. Once you feel your guy out and see if hes enjoying your new moves, maybe get a little bit more creative with your sucking and suck his foreskin into your mouth lightly... my honey really likes it ;) If the foreskin thing grosses you out a bit, there's nothing wrong with asking him to take a shower and clean it (or ya know.... soap it up for him ;)). In my experience, most guys are willing to do just about anything to get head so they're happy to get in the shower and get all clean for you. Easiest way is to communicate! Make sure he lets you know if its feeling good for him. Enjoy ;)

Marry me?
 
Is he quite young? I used to be ultra-sensitive when I first started having sex (despite the years of frantic teenage masturbation) as the foreskin had never been fully retracted and so the glans was never exposed. Having read up a bit I probably had an over-tight foreskin, which can be corrected by surgery (er, no thanks!)

As a result I found sex quite painful the first few times, and was not interested in receiving oral. I also doubt that I was as clean as I should have been, which probably put my wife off trying too.

Over the years, with lots of vigorous fucking, the foreskin eventually will be able to retract all the way, pretty much on its own, or can be helped by hand.

Even so, I was over 40 years old before I experienced ejaculation through oral sex.
 
I have never been with a guy with a circumcised cock. Here in Ireland circumcision isn't the norm. I have been with my husband for ten years so my knowledge of cocks other than his is rather hazy at this point but my husbands foreskin retracts itself when he is hard. He only gets super senstive after he cums. So eh, I am just realising that I don't have any actual advice on how to decrease the sensitivity apart from maybe using a condom if you aren't already. I have never given the circumcised versus non circumcised cock any thought, so can't really say if I do anything differently than you would with a cut cock.
 
Ritual genital mutilation is not the norm in the civilized parts of the world, but apart from that, the main difference between cut and un-cut is, that there are a lot more intact nerve endings and that the head of the penis is not calloused.
Just handle it like it was his cheek, rather than the sole of his foot.
:D

(Apart from that, maybe he is just ticklish?)

We had a thread on that very issue here
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=994755
 
Don't use your the top surface of the tongue because it's a bit too rough, so wet lips and maybe the tip of the tongue, then use your hand(s) up-n-down on the shaft at the same time as you keep the head in your mouth.
As others have said, DON'T pull the foreskin down any further than exposing the head - you're not trying to peel it!! :eek:

..and yea, age might affect how sensitive he is: an unexpected touch can make a guy jump out his skin in a bad way ( yeowch )
 
Last edited:
I used to be so good at doing this. Now I meet a man who is uncircumcised, a first for me. As I go down on him, he gets squeamish. He is sensitive to my oral touch. He wants to work on it. Any tips??

How is _he_ going to work on it? Does he intend to stick his dick into a fan?

Well, you know that he is sensitive. So be less rough. Simple.
 
Ritual genital mutilation is not the norm in the civilized parts of the world, but apart from that, the main difference between cut and un-cut is, that there are a lot more intact nerve endings and that the head of the penis is not calloused.
Just handle it like it was his cheek, rather than the sole of his foot.
:D

(Apart from that, maybe he is just ticklish?)

We had a thread on that very issue here
http://forum.literotica.com/showthread.php?t=994755



Cumference, you are partially right about circumcision, but only partially. I am uncircumcised and very distinctly remember sitting on a doctor's examination table as a small child, maybe 4 years old. I remember the doctor telling my mother there was no problem as my foreskin moved freely. Not the words but the jist has stuck with me for a bunch of years.

If the foreskin does not move freely and can't be fully retracted hygiene can and usually is a problem. In my case if I am unable to shower regularly a white substance forms under the skin which stinks. With regular bathing, pulling the skin back and washing there is no problem.

Scientific research has shown men who have been circumcised have a lower probability of contracting AIDS, I have no proof of this, but I assume this is very much the same for other types of STDs.

You should note female poster commented on having the guy shower first, I assume she has had some experience with guys who may have not been able to fully retract his foreskin or has not been taught to do so and wash well.

My point is not all circumcision is ritual and in reality may well be a medical necessity or a social nicety at least.
 
Ritual = social nicety so that goes nowhere.
The need for medical intervention for tight foreskins is very low ( I checked with my paediactrics friend )
If a guy can't keep is dick clean then ditch him.
"Scientific research has shown men who have been circumcised have a lower probability of contracting AIDS, I have no proof of this, but I assume this is very much the same for other types of STDs." Show me the research including who commission it. I hate these vague references to "research"
 
I used to watch this canadian sex dr on tv. I can't think of her name, but she was much older and took any kind of sexual question you wanted to ask. One guy did call in asking about a really bad smell from his penis that he couldn't get rid of no matter how often he showered. she told him it was smegma and it was this buildup from not cleaning well. He was uncircumcised. That is the only question of hers I remember because I had never heard of that. I don't know what it is, maybe sweat buildup or something, but it seems like this would be common knowledge in countries where circumcision is not the norm. Or is this one of those embarrasing questions that everyone has but is afraid to ask?
 
Cumference, you are partially right about circumcision, but only partially. I am uncircumcised and very distinctly remember sitting on a doctor's examination table as a small child, maybe 4 years old. I remember the doctor telling my mother there was no problem as my foreskin moved freely. Not the words but the jist has stuck with me for a bunch of years.
......

My point is not all circumcision is ritual and in reality may well be a medical necessity or a social nicety at least.

This is actually a rather interesting quote: The doctor telling you and your mother, that you were perfectly normal.... in a way that actually conveyed that it was something extraordinary (and slightly pathological).

The foreskin is actually attached to the helmet when born (yes, in addition to the cutting, it has to be ripped off). It differs when it is released, but it would not be unusual (or a problem) if it had not moved freely at 4.
( worth reading: http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/info/retraction.html Yes, you could argue it is biased)
Discussion. Boys usually are born with a non-retractile foreskin. The foreskin gradually becomes retractable over a variable period of time ranging from birth to 18 years or more. There is no “right” age for the foreskin to become retractable. Non-retractile foreskin does not threaten health in childhood and no intervention is necessary. Many boys only develop a retractable foreskin after puberty. Education of concerned parents usually is the only action required.

In Europe only Jews, Moslems and some other minority groups perform ritual genital mutilation of infants.
And the funny part of it?
Europeans are not dieing like flies from AIDS, STD and "rotting penii syndrome".
Neither were people in North America before Kellogg started his crusade against masturbation and the doctors chimed in, making easy money on a needless (but possibly quite serious) surgical procedure.

Yes, there are cases where some sort of surgery may be the right solution, but only very few, that justifies removing what constitutes half the surface area of a normal adult penis.
 
I used to watch this canadian sex dr on tv. I can't think of her name, but she was much older and took any kind of sexual question you wanted to ask. One guy did call in asking about a really bad smell from his penis that he couldn't get rid of no matter how often he showered. she told him it was smegma and it was this buildup from not cleaning well. He was uncircumcised. That is the only question of hers I remember because I had never heard of that. I don't know what it is, maybe sweat buildup or something, but it seems like this would be common knowledge in countries where circumcision is not the norm. Or is this one of those embarrasing questions that everyone has but is afraid to ask?

Washing under the foreskin is about as difficult as washing your feet (They will stink too if unwashed, but that does not justify cutting off the little toe or ripping off the nails to protect the child from fungal infections).

- Grab the wiener
- Slide the skin back
- wash
- slide skin back

An unwashed woman can stink to high heaven too (but FGM is at least not accepted).
The technical term is "smegma", and of course it has an entry on wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smegma
 
Ritual = social nicety so that goes nowhere.
The need for medical intervention for tight foreskins is very low ( I checked with my paediactrics friend )
If a guy can't keep is dick clean then ditch him.
"Scientific research has shown men who have been circumcised have a lower probability of contracting AIDS, I have no proof of this, but I assume this is very much the same for other types of STDs." Show me the research including who commission it. I hate these vague references to "research"

Indeed!

Let us look at some numbers:
http://www.circumstitions.com/HIV.html#doesn't

Conclusion: No value at all concerning any useful protection against HIV.
 
Why do you need to make this into a social issue? It's a simple question about giving a blow job. I personally prefer an circumcised penis from what I have seen on these threads, that's my personal preference, but I don't look down or belittle anyone's opinion who prefers to not be circumcised.

"that does not justify cutting off the little toe or ripping off the nails to protect the child from fungal infections)."

There wasn't any justification mentioned nor implied from any comment that I made. I was simply retelling something I had heard about on tv. You are certainly entitled to your opinion on it, but I didn't ask for social commentary.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I had cut and uncut dicks and neither kind stinks more than the other. It is the same thing as cutting dogs tails and ears for me, only dicks dont look any better imo :D
 
I had cut and uncut dicks and neither kind stinks more than the other. It is the same thing as cutting dogs tails and ears for me, only dicks dont look any better imo :D
I've the comparison to docking a dog's tail :)
Ouch !
 
Why do you need to make this into a social issue? It's a simple question about giving a blow job. I personally prefer an uncircumcised penis from what I have seen on these threads, that's my personal preference, but I don't look down or belittle anyone's opinion who prefers to not be circumcised.

"that does not justify cutting off the little toe or ripping off the nails to protect the child from fungal infections)."

There wasn't any justification mentioned nor implied from any comment that I made. I was simply retelling something I had heard about on tv. You are certainly entitled to your opinion on it, but I didn't ask for social commentary.
I wasn't the one that raised it but because it is a social issue. I dare say some men used to say why do we need to bother women with the vote?
 
I wasn't the one that raised it but because it is a social issue. I dare say some men used to say why do we need to bother women with the vote?
I am not saying it's not a social issue, but this thread was just a simple question and my comment wasn't an invitation for a flippant comment on the practice of circumcision. I don't care if he has an opinion on it, I don't even care if he likes the practice or not. I was just telling a simple story I had heard about smegma (wow, is that sentence awkward or what). I believe everyone has a right to have an opinion, I wasn't voicing one though and I wasn't inviting his. I don't think anything I said implied that it was good or bad. In the U.S. it's very normal, I am used to a circumcised penis and that's what I prefer. I didn't at anytime say anything bad about uncircumcised ones. I can understand that feelings are probably strong on both sides, but since I didn't insult him, please don't insult all the women who have decided to have it done with their sons. (I don't have children, but my sister does and I completely supported her decision to circumcise my nephew)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Don't lose your cool Iceprincess;) , I also gave some helpful advice on stopping the OP's man wriggling out of her mouth but I think you've become an unwilling scapegoat for the social issue. I think it's ok for the conversation to wander off, now we've come up with some ideas for the OP, but not ok for you to be held personally accountable for the practise :rose:
 
Last edited:
Ritual = social nicety so that goes nowhere.
The need for medical intervention for tight foreskins is very low ( I checked with my paediactrics friend )
If a guy can't keep is dick clean then ditch him.
"Scientific research has shown men who have been circumcised have a lower probability of contracting AIDS, I have no proof of this, but I assume this is very much the same for other types of STDs." Show me the research including who commission it. I hate these vague references to "research"



Here you go direct from the CDC, second paragraph.


http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/prevention/research/malecircumcision/


Mike
 
Back
Top