It seems that the stories always go out of their way to make sure the reader knows the girls in the stories are 18 or older. OK so I've only read a few dozen stories but it sure seems that way. Is that for some legal reason to protect literotica or the author?
My step-daughter and I are interested in putting to paper some stories from her life, going way back when she was very young (pre-teen). She was raped by a family member and wants to tell the story. I told her I would help by writing it down. She has shared the stories with me verbally but wants it written out. She intends on changing names in the stories, but telling it as close to the truth as she remembers as possible. Anyway she was 10 when she was raped by her first step-father and even younger when she had an "encounter" with her older brother.
What I see in the stories, especially the father-daughter incest stories, is a blatant attempt to make sure the reader understands the daughter is at least 18 years old. Some stories go on and talk about the daughters being put into foster homes. Now come on, 18, 20, even 21-year-olds being put into foster homes? It really detracts from the stories.
Or are we just simply not allowed to tell a story about a girl under the age of 18?
My step-daughter and I are interested in putting to paper some stories from her life, going way back when she was very young (pre-teen). She was raped by a family member and wants to tell the story. I told her I would help by writing it down. She has shared the stories with me verbally but wants it written out. She intends on changing names in the stories, but telling it as close to the truth as she remembers as possible. Anyway she was 10 when she was raped by her first step-father and even younger when she had an "encounter" with her older brother.
What I see in the stories, especially the father-daughter incest stories, is a blatant attempt to make sure the reader understands the daughter is at least 18 years old. Some stories go on and talk about the daughters being put into foster homes. Now come on, 18, 20, even 21-year-olds being put into foster homes? It really detracts from the stories.
Or are we just simply not allowed to tell a story about a girl under the age of 18?