RobDownSouth
No Kings
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2002
- Posts
- 77,904
Sometimes, they shoot back
Sadly, Zimmerman's wound is only superficial, and he is expected to live.
Sadly, Zimmerman's wound is only superficial, and he is expected to live.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sometimes, they shoot back
Sadly, Zimmerman's wound is only superficial, and he is expected to live.
Sometimes, they shoot back
Sadly, Zimmerman's wound is only superficial, and he is expected to live.
Let's face it, the big culprit in the Martin case was Florida's damn law that allows morons to run around with guns like its the wild west.
I've owned guns for close to thirty years, many of them of all types and I have never had one loaded in the car or waved one at anyone or carried one around....
what is it with people and what the hell are the laws in these places?
Let's face it, the big culprit in the Martin case was Florida's damn law that allows morons to run around with guns like its the wild west.
This has to be a joke!
Zimmerman was aiming and waving his gun at the other driver, and the driver shot at Zimmerman.
Because the driver felt threatened.
I don't believe it. You are actually claiming that a window makes a gun non-threatening?From what reliable source die you hear or read that?The shooter is named Apperson, and his lawyer is claiming that, but a lawyer for a defendant is not a reliable source.
Keep in mind that Z's window was closed at the time.
I don't believe it. You are actually claiming that a window makes a gun non-threatening?
He's basically the last of the old school gunslingers.
He's basically the last of the old school gunslingers. I see no plausible future that doesn't end with one of two options: he kills someone else and goes to prison for real, or he gets shot himself. I wonder if some tragic sense of his own fate is driving his antics.
I consider him to be the victim of bogus complaints and prosecution.
Being that no one has officially complained about Zimmerman how is he a victim of something that never happened?
There have been complaints to the cops, and I'm sure you have read about them, but nothing formal. The prosecution of Zimmerman was bogus because there was substantial evidence, eye-witness and forensic and circumstantial, that he acted in self defense.
There have been complaints to the cops, and I'm sure you have read about them, but nothing formal. The prosecution of Zimmerman was bogus because there was substantial evidence, eye-witness and forensic and circumstantial, that he acted in self defense.
My gosh, that's exactly what I said. There have been no official complaints, no one has pressed charges against him. So I ask again, how can he be the victim of bogus complaints if there haven't been any complaints?
Even our NRA backed governor thought there was enough evidence to have Zim stand trial a few years ago.
The complaints were made and they were, apparently, bogus, since the complainers did nothing to follow up, except for dropping the charges. The fact the complaints were not pursued does not mean they were not made, nor that they were expunged from the man's record.
Which governor is that?