Gallup Has Romney Up By 7 Today!

[ChinaBandit]

Post second debate is a factor in these numbers too.

 

[Busybody]

the methodology is flawed

 

[Liar]

Post second debate is a factor in these numbers too.

Gallup has a long rollover. So it's pre and post debate mixed.

At the same time, Obama has a 50% job approval rating, also according to Gallup. While trailing Romney 45% to 52% for keeping it. That's an interresting circle for them to square. Either one or the other (or both) must have it's sampling waaay off.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

the methodology is flawed

And it is an outlier...


Everyone knows Obama is going to win.


Stupid fucking neocons think they can steal an election.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Gallup says that only 3.4% of the population is glbt and we all know it has to be about 50-50...


So do not believe a word Gallup says and Rassmussen is wrong too unless they have Obama ahead in which case they are finally being honest instead of shill.

 

[Liar]

If Gallup is as parisan Librul as the Lit Right Wing Brigade usually posit they are, maybe this is an attempt to scare the bejesus out of the Democratic base to get their GOTV on.

 

[Wat_Tyler]

The Comancheros got into polling?


I thought they just killed off culture by leaving pianos in the desert.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

The horned toad has picked up a mean ragtime riff...

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

If Gallup is as parisan Librul as the Lit Right Wing Brigade usually posit they are, maybe this is an attempt to scare the bejesus out of the Democratic base to get their GOTV on.

No Gallup, like all the others has to get closer to the truth as we near election in order to be watched closely next time...

Obama's 50%, if you look at the chart came on the heels of cooked numbers.

The numbers are being corrected.

 

[CHNOPS]

Gallup says your sister's a slut.

 

[Wat_Tyler]

Keep the horned toad away from his 13-year-old cousins.


Perhaps some chain from the other thread, and a few shackles.


Then he can sing about all the oppression from first-hand experience.


And drive a hemi-orange Caddy and be one step ahead of the repo men.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Keep the horned toad away from his 13-year-old cousins.


Perhaps some chain from the other thread, and a few shackles.


Then he can sing about all the oppression from first-hand experience.


And drive a hemi-orange Caddy and be one step ahead of the repo men.

I will certainly keep him away from Silvio Berlusconi...


I think I shall get him a white-on-black tie and jacket.

 

[Wat_Tyler]

I will certainly keep him away from Silvio Berlusconi...


I think I shall get him a white-on-black tie and jacket.

Can they tailor it to go around his lumpy bits?


He's certainly not Brooks Brothers material . . . .


I need more coffee.

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

Gallup says that only 3.4% of the population is glbt and we all know it has to be about 50-50...


So do not believe a word Gallup says and Rassmussen is wrong too unless they have Obama ahead in which case they are finally being honest instead of shill.

No. Fifty percent of the population OUGHTA be GLBT and left-handed, and above average in school. We solved the above average problem, all kids are above average now, but the other issues are tough nuts to crack.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Can they tailor it to go around his lumpy bits?


He's certainly not Brooks Brothers material . . . .


I need more coffee.

He is neither off the rack or off the hook!

I shall consult Bokonon...

"Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before. He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way."

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

No. Fifty percent of the population OUGHTA be GLBT and left-handed, and above average in school. We solved the above average problem, all kids are above average now, but the other issues are tough nuts to crack.

No child gets ahead!


Unless she wants the state to pay for her change...

 

[Wat_Tyler]

Someone is drowning in Lake Woebegone.


*sniff*


As long as all the wimminz remain strong . . . .

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

"Write it all down. Without accurate records of the past, how can men and women be expected to avoid making serious mistakes in the future?"

"History! Read it and weep!"
Bokonon

 

[Wat_Tyler]

History bores me today nearly as much as the nightly news.


Well, history is better.


But no one pays attention.


They prefer the dried horned toad powdered version.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

The problem is that in reading, they call their moving lips liars and refuse to listen...

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

News flash!



Romney was up by 6:45AM!

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

A little light Comedy...

http://pjmedia.com/zombie/2012/10/18/the-secret-life-of-willard-mitty/?singlepage=true

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Rubbish masquerading as art is nothing new. Some of us have spent a good deal of time criticizing puerile acts of “transgression” that, more and more it seems, have replaced serious artistic endeavor.

It is one thing, however, for individuals to criticize art that is meretricious or worse. It is quite another for the federal government to insinuate itself into the process, intruding on the metabolism of free expression in order to further a political end. “When government’s coercive power is put in the service of the heckler’s veto,” Andy observes, “when it becomes the ‘ad hoc nullification machine’ by which corrupt officials smother constitutional protections that inconvenience their cronies, then that government is no longer legitimate.”

The issue here goes far beyond the shameless partisanship of a debate moderator, far beyond the particular lies of particular elected officials. What we see percolating down through the fissures of the body politic is a corrosive mixture that, unchecked, will eat away at the very foundations of our free society. “It is not enough,” Andy concludes, “to reject Obama’s lies. It is essential to reject the premise of his lies. In our society, we get to say unkind things about icons, just as we get to speak vigorously in their defense. It is for us, the sovereign people, to weigh the merits of these competing claims, without government’s meddling thumb on the scale. That is a big part of what makes Western civilization civilized.”

http://pjmedia.com/rogerkimball/2012/10/18/mccarthyism-i-can-support/?singlepage=true

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

It is going to get worse...

Shortly after Obamacare was passed and signed by the President, Michael Tanner of the Cato Institute noted a sudden plethora of articles that had begun to appear in a wide variety of MSM outlets about the probable ill-effects of "reform." This prompted him to ask, "Where were these reporters before the passage of the health care bill?" The answer to this question is now pretty obvious. They were colluding, via JournoList and other such forums that we don't know about, to make sure that no one screwed up and told the truth before that morass of taxes and regulations became the law of the land. To the nation's cost, their self-censorship succeeded.

Today, we face a similar but much more dangerous situation. The "reporters" of the establishment news media are engaged in a concerted campaign of misinformation to get Barack Obama re-elected. This has been evident for some time, but the breathtaking mendacity of this effort was writ large by Candy Crowley during last Tuesday's presidential debate. Everyone has by now seen the video clip: the President made the preposterous claim that he had identified the attack on our Benghazi consulate as an act of terrorism as early as September 12. Then, when Romney called him on this egregious whopper, Crowley repeated the lie.

This was no misbegotten attempt at instant "fact checking." It was a deliberately disingenuous attempt to pull the wool over the eyes of the debate's 65 million viewers. Crowley herself admitted that she had reviewed the transcript of Obama's September 12 Rose Garden remarks in advance of the debate, and she is not dumb enough to believe Obama's characterization of his boilerplate comment about "acts of terror" in general. This tag-team prevarication may well backfire. Jeffrey Lord suggests, in Thursday's American Spectator, that it may turn out to be the "tipping point that makes Mitt Romney the 45th President of the United States."

http://spectator.org/archives/2012/10/19/what-if-crowley-and-her-accomp

Now that people see a lead, they know that it is okay to vote for Romney and that makes it easier to switch your vote being accompanied by the new majority opinion.

After the debate that the Left thinks their guy won, there is no way to stop the bleeding.

It is clear that the President and his media will lie for gain.

No one likes that.

Period.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

One of the things that makes Hans Christian Andersen's "The Emperor's New Clothes" such an enduring parable is how it is both absurd and painfully true. The emperor was naked, but no one wanted to be the first to admit it. A kind of mass hysteria affected the citizens. Once a child spoke the obvious truth, the delusion was shattered. If there were not a lot of truth about human nature reflected in the story, it wouldn't be such a classic.

Obama's nakedness is not physical but rather intellectual. Time magazine's Joe Klein said recently, "Anyone who says Barack Obama is not intelligent is either crazy or bigoted." What makes Klein so certain that Obama is intelligent? The evidence is all in the opposite direction. Forrest Gump famously said, "Stupid is as stupid does." The corollary is also true. Smart is as smart does. Was choosing Joe Biden as someone to be a heartbeat away from the presidency a smart decision? If you think so, you need to watch the video of last week's vice-presidential debate.

Another reality that may be penetrating the liberals' self-delusion shield is the Benghazi debacle. It's been said that a liberal is someone who will not take his own side in a fight. A perfect example of that perverse attitude is how Obama, Hillary Clinton, and Susan Rice were all so eager to take the terrorists' side in the attacks on our embassies. They used the strongest possible words in condemning the obscure video and its creator. Ms. Clinton said the video was "disgusting and reprehensible" and "truly abhorrent." By blaming the video so vehemently they effectively implied the attackers were justified. They took the terrorists' side in the fight. They basically said, "We totally understand why you wanted to kill our ambassador. You don't like America; neither do we."

http://spectator.org/archives/2012/10/19/the-democrats-rough-re-entry-i