Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ramos easily found out all that from none other than the district attorney himself.
Probably the DA is required to turn info, such as names and addresses of witnesses over to the lawyer for the accused. That makes sense, I suppose. In this case, however, the lawyer was also the accused.
SelenaKittyn said:You would think they might have made a motion for an EXCEPTION with the judge?![]()
Amazing isn't it?Colleen Thomas said:Problem is, if you deny him the information, while he is acting in the capacity of his own lawyer, you open up an avenue of appeal, based on proceedural things. In NY, all things considered, he might very well get the entire sentence overtunred on that technicality.
Colleen Thomas said:Classic case of "he needed killin".
Ms.Breaker said:More like a prime example of why a judge should be allowed a gun behind the podium. That way he can just shoot the idiot in the head and say case closed.
SEVERUSMAX said:And here I thought that lynching was illegal.![]()
SEVERUSMAX said:So to hell with the Constitution, the 8th Amendment, proportionate justice, due process of law, proving that someone is actually guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and convicting them in a court of law? To hell with the rule of law? Well, I wish the Framers had bothered to INFORM me that charges of rape were exceptions to due process and deserved harsher penalties than murder or treason! That would have been useful information!![]()
SEVERUSMAX said:And here I thought that lynching was illegal.![]()
SEVERUSMAX said:Point taken on the conviction, but I don't regard rape as a capital offense, deserving of a harsher penalty than murder or treason!![]()
Ms.Breaker said:Never had it happen to you have you?![]()
SEVERUSMAX said:I understand what you are saying, but I doubt that they would condone lynching, as Ms. Breaker has admitted to condoning.
SEVERUSMAX said:That is irrelevant. Punishments can't be based on emotion. They must be based on the rule of law. We can't let passion or outrage control our decision-making process. A rape victim is traumatized, yes, but she can still have a life. A dead woman can't.
Ms.Breaker said:I condone the death penalty. If it can be done in a faster less costly way to the tax payers I'm all for it. How much does it cost to incarcerate and feed a criminal sentenced to die? Generally the cost of one bullet is cheaper.
Ms.Breaker said:Point on emotion conceded.
SEVERUSMAX said:Nothing against the death penalty, for murder and treason- AFTER a trial, that is.
SEVERUSMAX said:So we ARE listening to each other, and not just talking past other? Good.