Fucking monkeys!

BlackShanglan

Silver-Tongued Papist
Joined
Jul 7, 2004
Posts
16,888
And for the filthy-minded, that's an annoyed exclamation containing an initial modifying present participle, not a description of my current actions containing an initial main verb.

But seriously (and, you'll be relieved to know, without any reference whatesoever to erotic fiction) -

Is there a primatologist in the house?

Shanglan
 
BlackShanglan said:
And for the filthy-minded, that's an annoyed exclamation containing an initial modifying present participle, not a description of my current actions containing an initial main verb.

But seriously (and, you'll be relieved to know, without any reference whatesoever to erotic fiction) -

Is there a primatologist in the house?

Shanglan

Nope, but I've stroked a few and live only 25 miles from Monkeyworld.

:confused:
 
I can't say that I am a primatologist.

Tatelou said:
Nope, but I've stroked a few and live only 25 miles from Monkeyworld.

:confused:

You've stroked a few primatologists?
 
Equinoxe said:
You've stroked a few primatologists?

Yes, but my sister-in-law went one better. :eek: Seriously! Her boyfriend is a primatologist at Monkeyworld. :D
 
BlackShanglan said:
And for the filthy-minded, that's an annoyed exclamation containing an initial modifying present participle, not a description of my current actions containing an initial main verb.
I am glad you cleared that up; I was afraid we were dealing with bestiality all of a sudden.

(shit...that means I'm filthy minded, doesn't it? :eek: )
 
BlackShanglan said:
And for the filthy-minded, that's an annoyed exclamation containing an initial modifying present participle, not a description of my current actions containing an initial main verb.

But seriously (and, you'll be relieved to know, without any reference whatesoever to erotic fiction) -

Is there a primatologist in the house?

Shanglan


Nerd!!! :D That's why I love you, Shang! :heart: :rose:
 
Virtual_Burlesque said:
This is the flying fucking stroking smirking monkey thread.
I've always wondered what it was we were lacking around here. Now I know. :D
 
minsue said:
What an intriguing little thread.

I'm not really sure where it started, I can't figure out where it really is and I have absolutly no fucking idea where it's going....

... and yet I can't look away. :D
 
BlackShanglan said:
And for the filthy-minded, that's an annoyed exclamation containing an initial modifying present participle, not a description of my current actions containing an initial main verb.

But seriously (and, you'll be relieved to know, without any reference whatesoever to erotic fiction) -

Is there a primatologist in the house?

Shanglan
Do you really need a primatologist or will a decent googlist do as well? Seriously, a research assistant is worth their weight in primate studies degrees...
 
champagne1982 said:
Do you really need a primatologist or will a decent googlist do as well? Seriously, a research assistant is worth their weight in primate studies degrees...
Good point.

And good to see you! :rose:
 
champagne1982 said:
Do you really need a primatologist or will a decent googlist do as well? Seriously, a research assistant is worth their weight in primate studies degrees...
Unless you have an infinite number of monkeys, typewriters, and no pressing deadlines. :D
 
AppleBiter said:
Nerd!!! :D That's why I love you, Shang! :heart: :rose:

And I love you :) But wait until you get to the actual question closer to the bottom of thread ... if you admire nerds, this should probably lead you to recognize me as your god.


Tatelou said:
Nope, but I've stroked a few and live only 25 miles from Monkeyworld.

:confused:

What inexpressible joy to know that there *is* a Monkeyworld. And probably a Santa Claus.

Tatelou said:
Yes, but my sister-in-law went one better. :eek: Seriously! Her boyfriend is a primatologist at Monkeyworld. :D

Damn. I need to go stake out Monkeyworld - "World's Largest Captive Population of Primatologists!" Seriously, I will keep them in mind because I think that this trail is rapidly leading toward professional consultation.


champagne1982 said:
Do you really need a primatologist or will a decent googlist do as well? Seriously, a research assistant is worth their weight in primate studies degrees...

Excellent suggestion. I have, however, been Googling for about two days now and also consulting exciting volumes with titles like "The Taxonomy of South America Primates." Tomorrow I will be reading a 300-page dissertation - thank goodness for electronic online dissertation availability - and awaiting the arrival of a 1769 account of a voyage to Surinam, in French. Unfortunately, as this may all suggest, my question is a bit complex:

What were the likely ranges of leontopithecus chrysopygus (black or golden-rumped lion tamarin) and callimico goeldii (goeldi's monkey or tamarin) in roughly the year 1660, and which is less likely: that they actually lived or at least were transported and sold as far north as Dutch Guyana before massive deforestation and habitat destruction restricted their modern range, or that the person describing the kitten-sized black "lions" being kept as pets somehow failed to notice or record the bright golden paws of saguinus midas (midas tamarin), the only semi-close match still native to the area? Oh, and what marmosets was the man recording (he mentions those by name), considering that the closest modern populations of marmosets appear to be midway down the Brazilian coast and somewhere near the border of Brazil and Peru?

Why? Because it's there!

Shanglan
 
Tatelou said:
Nope, but I've stroked a few and live only 25 miles from Monkeyworld.

:confused:


I've spanked a few :) and I live nowhere near Monkeyworld :D
 
BlackShanglan said:
What were the likely ranges of leontopithecus chrysopygus (black or golden-rumped lion tamarin) and callimico goeldii (goeldi's monkey or tamarin) in roughly the year 1660, and which is less likely: that they actually lived or at least were transported and sold as far north as Dutch Guyana before massive deforestation and habitat destruction restricted their modern range, or that the person describing the kitten-sized black "lions" being kept as pets somehow failed to notice or record the bright golden paws of saguinus midas (midas tamarin), the only semi-close match still native to the area? Oh, and what marmosets was the man recording (he mentions those by name), considering that the closest modern populations of marmosets appear to be midway down the Brazilian coast and somewhere near the border of Brazil and Peru?

I am not a primatologist, nor am I particularly well acquainted with New World primates (or for that matter Old World ones). Having said that, I have endeavoured to research the issue and provide some help.

According to the information that I can find, leontopithecus chrysopygus has never been known to live outside of Brazil and wasn't registered taxonomically until 1823 by Mikan. Likewise, as near as I can tell the historic distribution of callimico goeldii was never into Guyana and it was registered in 1904 by Thomas. Of course, the time frame of the story predates the Linnaean taxonomical system, which has potential mitigating effects upon the specificity of the creatures. The biological sciences were not quite what one sees today, or even one hundred years later, in 1660. As for someone in the 17th century not knowing the difference between leontopithecus chrysopygus and saguinus midas, it seems possible.

One of the problems with South America as a historical setting is that huge parts of it were never really examined until the 20th century; there are still parts of it which haven't seen human beings (or at least, modern scientists). It's entirely possible, even probable, that no one in that time frame would be remotely acquainted with any of the species we know now.
 
carsonshepherd said:
don't worry, vella darling.... when feces-throwing comes around, Joe is not far behind.
thank you handsome, i know monkey boy will turn up...
theres just something so endearing about the lice picking.
 
Back
Top