Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That is part of how they are flipping black voters, who are generally conservative, religious, and very tired of being screwed by public schools.Supreme Court Poised to Overturn 38 State Constitutional
Amendments on Church-State Separation
Jan. 22, 2020
Religious conservatives asked the Supreme Court
Wednesday to overturn 38 state constitutional amendments
and require taxpayers to fund religious schools.
You read that right.
The case, Espinoza v. Montana Dept. of Revenue isn’t
about whether a state may fund religious schools through
a school choice, voucher, or similar program. It’s about
whether it must.
And the conservatives might just win.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/supre...utional-amendments-on-church-state-separation
The Supreme Court Will Decide If Taxpayer Money
Should Benefit Religious Schools
January 22, 2020
This morning, the Supreme Court will hear a case called
Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue that could l
ead to public money going to private religious schools.
The wall of separation between church and state has
never looked so weak.
For anyone who may not be aware of what the case is
about or why this matters, I hope this background
material is useful.
In 2015, the Montana legislature passed a bill giving a $150
income tax credit to residents who funded private school
scholarships. If you gave the schools some money, the state
would, in essence, reward you for it.
It sounded fine… until you realized most of those private schools
were religious. So the government was really just rewarding people
for giving money to a religious school even if the law was always
meant to be secular.
The money itself wasn’t a huge deal. It was the principle
that mattered. Article X, Section 6 of Montana’s constitution
explicitly forbids public money funding religious schools…
yet this new law established a link between public money
and religious schools.
The argument against this line of thinking was that a tax credit
wasn’t really “public funds,” and the donations were ultimately
helping students, not the religious schools.
Both defenses were weak. The government was effectively,
albeit indirectly, subsidizing tuition at religious schools.
Even if the scholarships were for students, the schools received
a benefit from being able to offer those scholarships since
they enticed more people to possibly go there.
https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com...payer-money-should-benefit-religious-schools/
Traitors!
You wear the face that tells the world that you know
that you are doing something that is wrong.