JUDO
Flasher
- Joined
- May 1, 2001
- Posts
- 2,240
I just posted in another thread some of my thoughts on what I believe constitutes a lot of the poetry here at Lit - freeform poetry.
Freeform poetry is judged by me on the words used, their individual meaning and their meaning implied by close association with their neighboring words.
The rhythm of freeform for me seems to come from the punctuation on the page and the words' syllables themselves. Oft times, words positioned in a cascade pattern imply they are to be read that was, as though falling down the page.
In fact, much of what I feel about freeform is that it is intended to be read, that possibly, audible representation is where freeform truly can fly.
I find freeform fascinating. A jumble of words place on the page with a structure created "of the moment" and yet, when it works, no structure could have been more sublime.
But that in and of itself, seems to make freeform so difficult to be successful with. There is no structure to follow, no rules, no boundaries. And as a result, I see a lot of attempts at freeform that simply fail me or leave me cold as a reader?
So, my question is this:
When freeform works, is it Inspiration speaking through the mind of its chosen poet or is it chance?
How do we judge that which has no form?
Freeform poetry is judged by me on the words used, their individual meaning and their meaning implied by close association with their neighboring words.
The rhythm of freeform for me seems to come from the punctuation on the page and the words' syllables themselves. Oft times, words positioned in a cascade pattern imply they are to be read that was, as though falling down the page.
In fact, much of what I feel about freeform is that it is intended to be read, that possibly, audible representation is where freeform truly can fly.
I find freeform fascinating. A jumble of words place on the page with a structure created "of the moment" and yet, when it works, no structure could have been more sublime.
But that in and of itself, seems to make freeform so difficult to be successful with. There is no structure to follow, no rules, no boundaries. And as a result, I see a lot of attempts at freeform that simply fail me or leave me cold as a reader?
So, my question is this:
When freeform works, is it Inspiration speaking through the mind of its chosen poet or is it chance?
How do we judge that which has no form?