Freedom a Bother?

Lost Cause

It's a wrap!
Joined
Oct 7, 2001
Posts
30,949
Looks like we're ready to surrender or freedom for security, what do you think of this survey.

August 29, 2002 - WASHINGTON
For the first time in the annual State of the First Amendment survey, almost half (49%) of those surveyed said the First Amendment goes too far in the rights it guarantees — a 10-percentage-point jump from 2001, which suggests new public concerns in the wake of the Sept. 11 terror attacks. The State of the First Amendment 2002 survey report was released today in a media briefing at the National Press Club. “The stakes have risen for the First Amendment in the wake of September 11,” said Ken Paulson, executive director of the First Amendment Center. “The results of our 2002 survey suggest that many Americans view these fundamental freedoms as possible obstacles in the war on terrorism.” In 2001, 39% of those surveyed said the First Amendment went too far in the rights it guarantees. “That’s not to suggest a monolithic response to these core First Amendment values. In truth, Americans are of multiple minds about the 45 words drafted by James Madison,” Paulson said. “While a majority says they respect the First Amendment, a significant percentage seems inclined to rewrite it.” The annual State of the First Amendment survey, conducted since 1997 by the Center for Survey Research & Analysis at the University of Connecticut, examines public attitudes toward freedom of speech, press, religion and the rights of assembly and petition. The survey was done this year in partnership with American Journalism Review magazine, which published the full survey results in its September issue, available beginning today.

About half of those surveyed said the American press has been too aggressive in asking government officials for information about the war on terrorism. More than four in 10 said they would limit the academic freedom of professors and bar criticism of government military policy. About half of those surveyed said government should be able to monitor religious groups in the interest of national security, even if that means infringing upon religious freedom. More than four in 10 said the government should have greater power to monitor the activities of Muslims living in the United States than it does other religious groups. About 40% of those surveyed said they have too little access to information about the government’s war on terrorism, compared to 16% who said there’s too much. Forty-eight percent of those surveyed said there’s too little access to government records, compared to just 8% who believe there’s too much. The least popular First Amendment right once again was freedom of the press. Forty-two percent of respondents said the press in America has too much freedom to do what it wants, roughly the same level as last year. The survey also found, as in previous years, that many Americans are unable to name the five freedoms guaranteed in the First Amendment. The percentages of those responding who were able to identify individual freedoms:

58% — freedom of speech
18% — freedom of religion
14% — freedom of the press
10% — freedom of assembly/association
2% — freedom of petition

The national survey of 1,000 respondents was conducted by Center for Survey Research and Analysis at the University of Connecticut by telephone between June 12 and July 5, 2002. The sampling error is plus-or-minus 3%

:D
 
I expressed my outrage of it. Laurel was quick to point out those who said that the 1st went too far were very uneducated.
 
This is why, in Heinlein's book Starship Troopers only Veterans could be citizens, and vote. I think that this isn't such a bad idea.

Maybe we should consider it.
 
.
Good idea. With the exception of Colin Powell, that would pretty much eliminate all of Bush's cabinet since Rumsford, Cheney, Bush, et al have never served in any war or conflict for their country.
 
sch00lteacher said:
This is why, in Heinlein's book Starship Troopers only Veterans could be citizens, and vote. I think that this isn't such a bad idea.

Maybe we should consider it.

I do hope this is intended to be tongue in cheek.
 
No, not really. Who gives more of themselves than a veteran? Being willing to die to protect your country says a little bit about your thought process.

You want to vote? Join the military. Serve. You don't have to fight to be a vet.

I'm not saying that this is the way it should be. I am thinking 'out loud' on the keyboard. Sharing my thoughts... Thats all.
 
Lost Cause said:
The survey also found, as in previous years, that many Americans are unable to name the five freedoms guaranteed in the First Amendment. The percentages of those responding who were able to identify individual freedoms:

58% — freedom of speech
18% — freedom of religion
14% — freedom of the press
10% — freedom of assembly/association
2% — freedom of petition

The national survey of 1,000 respondents was conducted by Center for Survey Research and Analysis at the University of Connecticut by telephone between June 12 and July 5, 2002. The sampling error is plus-or-minus 3%

:D
This sort of goes to show how self absorbed and shallow we have become does it not? No worries at all to those that think we have to much freedom, with Ashcroft as the attorney general, our civil liberties will erode. The more I look at this Bush administration, the more I detest it.
 
sch00lteacher said:
No, not really. Who gives more of themselves than a veteran? Being willing to die to protect your country says a little bit about your thought process.

You want to vote? Join the military. Serve. You don't have to fight to be a vet.

I'm not saying that this is the way it should be. I am thinking 'out loud' on the keyboard. Sharing my thoughts... Thats all.

well you're entitled to do that I suppose. Pretty friggin' scary thought tho.
 
Back
Top