"Free Willy"!!

RhumbRunner13

No alts, no "Iggy"
Joined
Jan 4, 2002
Posts
3,463
OSLO (Reuters) - Keiko the killer whale, star of the "Free Willy" movies, came to the wrong place for new friends when he arrived in Norway this week -- the only nation in the world that hunts whales commercially.

The world's most famous orca, released into the wild just six weeks ago, turned up in a narrow Norwegian fjord this week, where he has made a splash with the locals and even allowed children to ride on his back.

Norwegians rushed to the Skaalvik fjord to see a playful Keiko put on a display for them, but some whale experts worried about his fate.

One even suggested putting him to sleep.

Millions of dollars have been spent on preparing the 30-foot animal for life in the wild after the 1993 movie "Free Willy" prompted a campaign for his release, but Keiko still seems to prefer human company.

One expert, Nils Oien at the Institute of Marine Research in Bergen, said he thought Keiko would never be able to survive in the wild after spending almost his entire life in captivation.

"I think putting him to sleep would be an alternative," he told Norwegian national radio NRK, prompting a death threat from a U.S.-based animal rights activist.

Keiko showed up in western Norway after swimming some 870 miles from an Icelandic sea pen following his release in July. He was spotted in the fjord Sunday by two 12-year-olds fishing in a small rowing boat.

Norway, with long whaling traditions, resumed commercial hunting of whales in 1993, ignoring a global moratorium.

However, it only hunts the minke whale.

Dag Paulsen, a spokesman for the Norwegian Directorate of Fisheries, said authorities were looking into other options to ensure Keiko's well-being and he would not be killed.

"Putting him to sleep is not an issue at this point. The whale is not damaging in any way," he said, adding the only minor danger was that Keiko could damage the area's fish farms.

"The biggest problem is all the people gathering in the area," Paulsen said.

He said Norwegian authorities were talking to Keiko's monitoring team, which has tracked Keiko since he left Iceland, to decide whether to use food to lure him back to deep waters or find another fjord in western Norway away from the fish farms.


Now they are "banning" any contact with him!

The footage on TV was priceless..Keiko rolling in the water with kids climbing all over him, his gently nudging a small blow up boat over and dunking the people in the water and pacing along with a motor boat so the people could reach out and touch him.

Gotta love those "environmentalists" though...If he won't be wild, we'll just have to kill him!:rolleyes:

Rhumb:(

Damn Norwegians cant spell "Fnord" either!!
 
RhumbRunner13 said:
Gotta love those "environmentalists" though...If he won't be wild, we'll just have to kill him!:rolleyes:
Was this whale expert an environmentalist as well? I couldn't find who exactly suggested putting him to sleep (or the reasoning behind such a proposal).
 
Oh yes killing him would be a much better option than having him live in captivity.:eek: To me it seems that he would much rather have human contact.
 
Re: Re: "Free Willy"!!

Mischka said:
Was this whale expert an environmentalist as well? I couldn't find who exactly suggested putting him to sleep (or the reasoning behind such a proposal).

They are not going to "put him to sleep", it was just one wacko's idea. Just seems to me if Keiko likes people and does them no harm let's use his "love" of humans as an educational opportunity. If kids and parents can go swim and play with a whale, they might be far less likely to support killing any of them.

Rhumb:cool:
 
My question revolved around why you said the person calling for his death (sorry for the "putting to sleep" euphamism) is an environmentalist.

My personal opinion is, if he's not going to make it in the wild, and it's not feasible to recapture him, then let him live or die according to nature's laws.
 
Mischka said:
My question revolved around why you said the person calling for his death (sorry for the "putting to sleep" euphamism) is an environmentalist.

My personal opinion is, if he's not going to make it in the wild, and it's not feasible to recapture him, then let him live or die according to nature's laws.

They were the people who used the euphemism, I wasn't being critical of you. I put quotes around environmentalists because I was struck with the irony of someone SO involved with a study that is environmentally centered thinking it might be best to kill him because he won't conform to the expectations of the "expert".

He is doing very well in the wild, maintaining weight and hunting on his own. He occasionally follows his escort boat out and mingles with other Orcas, but follows the boat back in every time. He seems to prefer people to other whales and since people are responsible for that caring, I think people are responsible to provide him with whatever it takes to make his life full.

I would be irresponsible to abandon my cat to the wilds; he might survive, he might not.

What's the difference?

Rhumb:cool:
 
Back
Top