Pure
Fiel a Verdad
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2001
- Posts
- 15,135
Every battle has a least two stories. There are 'brave' as well as hapless on both sides.
And many battles or combats have a racial side not acknowledged by many at the time. The "Alamo" problem is not different from the "Cowboys and Indians" problem of the older westerns, and brings up the question, "Why are all coyboys, esp. heroes, white?" (Remedied a bit in some more recent Westerns like Unforgiven). The Hispanic issue is a little better handled in movies like "Lone Star" iirc.
Pearl Harbor must be a helluva celebration in some quarters; it *was* rather well executed.
I'm told some are uncomfortable when Japanese officer veterans get together to remember some glorious battles of WWII.
Presumably it's mostly not the glorious battles later in the war, that the US veterans remember, which the US won.
If I read Colly correctly, she's saying that the 'good' /'evil' labels applied to historical conflicts, don't fit well. Which implies too, that even were they reversed in a fit of PCness (Indians good, white men bad) that's not exactly true either.
To be current: Is it a matter for celebration or lament if a small group of American 'contractors' (mercenaries) is ambushed in Iraq? Or neither. Just another bloody page of history.
J.
And many battles or combats have a racial side not acknowledged by many at the time. The "Alamo" problem is not different from the "Cowboys and Indians" problem of the older westerns, and brings up the question, "Why are all coyboys, esp. heroes, white?" (Remedied a bit in some more recent Westerns like Unforgiven). The Hispanic issue is a little better handled in movies like "Lone Star" iirc.
Pearl Harbor must be a helluva celebration in some quarters; it *was* rather well executed.
I'm told some are uncomfortable when Japanese officer veterans get together to remember some glorious battles of WWII.
Presumably it's mostly not the glorious battles later in the war, that the US veterans remember, which the US won.
If I read Colly correctly, she's saying that the 'good' /'evil' labels applied to historical conflicts, don't fit well. Which implies too, that even were they reversed in a fit of PCness (Indians good, white men bad) that's not exactly true either.
To be current: Is it a matter for celebration or lament if a small group of American 'contractors' (mercenaries) is ambushed in Iraq? Or neither. Just another bloody page of history.
J.
