For those who remember their car-based love lives . . .

[gunhilltrain]

. . .which is probably most of us:

https://www.literotica.com/s/fun-in-the-back-seat

Americans don't just have a love affair with the automobile, they have their affairs inside the cars too.

There is a bonus illustration with this:

http://www.hamtramck-historical.com/images/vintage-advertising/71-coronet_4_door.jpg

 

[thewinedarksea]

Hi,

Nice story. It's an interesting idea and you put in the work to develop it. It works overall as an idea, but I think there are a few flaws. Some comments:

Does it matter that Judy is short for Judith? Do we need to be told that twice?

The fun of this premise, to me, is in exploring the daring places people will go when they are roleplaying. The reader gets to enjoy both the surface-level eroticism, the tension of the role-play, and also the characters experiencing the breakdown of their own inhibitions.

However, when Judy says "You're looking for a place to park with me, aren't you?", the role-play breaks down a bit. Let me explain. If Judy is in character here, it's obviously too forward a gambit and breaks plausibility; if this is the real Judy breaking character to figure out what's going on, this disrupts the flow of the fantasy for the reader. More effective would have been Judy's character expressing nervousness or subtle delight at this potentially predatory, rushed encounter.

Later, again, Judy says "I get that. You know what I often say; look like a good girl but act like a bad one." The "often" indicates we are out of role-play now, but we slip back into role-play in the next paragraph when describing "first dates". At this point I'm not invested in the characters your characters are playing any longer.

This line is confusing: "When I came she swallowed it all, which she would do periodically." Does this mean she swallowed periodically during this ejaculation, or that this is an occasional habit of hers in other sexual encounters? If it's the latter, we have again broken character.

I think that the story would be much better if the two keep in character for the entirety of the role-play. It can be effective if there is some breakdown of the role-play during the sex itself, as this introduces the erotic potential of misunderstanding and cross-purposes, but to have so many interruptions throughout the role-play was not effective, in my opinion.

The sex itself is described in very broad strokes. That's fine if the sex itself is incidental to the erotic interplay of the two characters, but if you want to arouse the reader, I think you need to hook us with some more concrete details about the physicality of it all.

The literary references might make sense to you, but they really don't enlighten the reader or add to the scene.

A few grammar issues, if you want feedback on that:
"I might be interesting in joining the paper myself." > should be "interested"
"His kisses were softer and friendlier than Michelle's" > his? hers?
She said, "Now were back to normal. > missing close quote; should be "we're"

 

[gunhilltrain]

Thanks for your feedback.

I think the reason that Judy fell out of character several times is that she never played a role before and she probably didn't have the acting skills to do it for that long. I've never tried it myself, but I imagine going for an hour or more requires a lot of focus.

She ended the role abruptly because she was tired of it and didn't want to continue in the restaurant. Since she is not the narrator, I wasn't able to describe all her thoughts about it. Maybe there should have been some dialogue about that.

Yes, describing the details of sex can be difficult. I've noticed a lot of authors kind of glide past that even when they perhaps intended to be explicit.

I'm not sure when to let the readers figure out references or tell them what they are. The main thing I know about Mourning Becomes Electra is that is takes several hours to stage the whole thing.

Typos: there always seems to be another one to be found.